Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SHINKAI, T.
Right arrow Articles by SUEMASU, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SHINKAI, T.
Right arrow Articles by SUEMASU, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 16:279-287 (1986)
© 1986 Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research


research-article

Antiemetic Efficacy of High-Dose Intravenous Metoclopramide and Dexamethasone in Patients Receiving Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TETSU SHINKAI, M.D., NAGAHIRO SAIJO, M.D., KENJI EGUCHI, M.D., YASUTSUNA SASAKI, M.D., TOMOHIDE TAMURA, M.D., KEIGO TOMINAGA, M.D., MASANORI SAKURAI, M.D., TETSURO SANO, M.D., HIROYUKI TAITO, M.D., HIDENOBU TAKAHASHI, M.D., HIDEHIKO NAKANO, M.D., KAZUHIKO NAKAGAWA, M.D. and KEIICHI SUEMASU, M.D.

Department of internal Medicine National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo

Reprint requests: Tetsu Shinkai, M.D, Department of Internal Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1, Tsukiji 5-chome, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104, Japan.

Received July 8, 1986; High-dose intravenous (IV) metoclopramide has shown efficacy with few side effects for the treatment of nausea and vomiting on the day of cisplatin administration. From November 1984 to January 1986, two randomized trials in an antiemetic study were conducted. In trial I, the antiemetic effect of a short course of high-dose dexamethasone was compared with that of high-dose metoclopramide in 29 patients with lung cancer receiving chemotherapy con taining cisplatin (80 mg/m2 IV) in a randomized controlled trial. Dexamethasone was given IV at a dose of 16 mg 1/2 hr before and 8 mg, 1 1/2, 3 1/2 and 5 1/2 hr after cisplatin. Metoclopramide was given IV at a dose of 2 mg/kg, 1/2 hr before and 1 1/2, 3 1/2 and 5 1/2 hr after cisplatin. Major emetic control (0–2 episodes of vomiting) during the 24 hr after cisplatin administration was achieved in 55% (6/11) and 67% (12/18) of the patients receiving dexa methasone and metoclopramide, respectively, without serious toxicity. The dura tion of nausea or anorexia was similar for the two treatment groups. In trial 11, the combination of metoclopramide and dexamethasone was compared with metoclopramide alone to assess the additive antiemetic effect of the two drugs in 23 patients with lung cancer receiving cisplatin at a dose of 120 mg/m IV in a randomized cross-over study. A major antiemetic response was observed in 27% (3/11) and 92% (11/12) of the patients receiving metoclopramide alone and metoclopramide plus dexamethasone, respectively (p < 0.005). The duration of nausea and anorexia was similar for the two treatment groups. Pa tients tended to prefer the combination of metoclopramide and dexamethasone; however, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.14) in the small number of patients entered in this study. Despite excellent control of acute chemotherapy-induced emesis, 45% of 52 patients experienced delayed nausea and vomiting more than 24 hr after cisplatin administration even among those who had had an excellent short-term response to the antiemetic agents.

Key Words: Chemotherapy, Antiemetic • Small cell lung cancer • Randomized trial • Cisplatin


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
J. P. A. Ioannidis, P. J. Hesketh, and J. Lau
Contribution of Dexamethasone to Control of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Evidence
J. Clin. Oncol., October 19, 2000; 18(19): 3409 - 3422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.