Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 27, Issue 6 394-400, Copyright © 1997 by Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research
S Egawa, K Matsumoto, M Iwamura, T Uchida, S Kuwao and K Koshiba
Theoretical projected prostate cancer volume at the time of expected death
was determined based on patient age and index cancer volume at diagnosis,
assumed cancer volume doubling time and life expectancy of the Japanese
male population. Based on the data obtained, evaluation was made of the
results for 104 consecutive radical prostatectomy cases with no prior
treatment. Clinically insignificant cancer in 104 prostatectomy specimens
was found to occur at 4.8, 10.6, 15.4 and 26.9% for tumor doubling times of
2, 3, 4 and 6 years, respectively. Assuming a 2-year doubling time with
clinically insignificant cancer excluded, only 36.4% of significant cancers
could be considered potentially curable and with a 3-year doubling time,
32.3%. For 4- and 6-year doubling times, only 30.7 and 25.0% of the
clinically insignificant cancers were potentially curable, respectively.
Approximately half of these insignificant cancers were clinically stage T1c
disease. In all stage T1c cases, 8.8-47.1% was considered insignificant,
depending on tumor doubling time. Patient life expectancy and tumor
doubling time significantly determine the outcome of treatment for prostate
cancer, especially in elderly males with higher risk of mortality. The
outcome of radical prostatectomy is less satisfactory with these factors
taken into consideration. Many patients with stage T1c disease may
eventually prove to require no treatment.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Impact of life expectancy and tumor doubling time on the clinical significance of prostate cancer in Japan
Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Small-molecule inhibition of Wee1 kinase by MK-1775 selectively sensitizes p53-deficient tumor cells to DNA-damaging agents Mol. Cancer Ther., November 1, 2009; 8(11): 2992 - 3000. |
||||
