Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 27, Issue 6 445-446, Copyright © 1997 by Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research
J Sakamoto, S Teramukai, H Nakazato and Y Ohashi
In a previous randomized clinical trial against curatively resected gastric
cancer, we compared the effect of immunochemotherapy to chemotherapy and
obtained significantly better survival and disease-free survival time (DFS)
in a combined therapy group. Although DFS was analysed with a conventional
approach in which the onset of relapse was defined as the diagnosis of
relapse, we considered it necessary to re-analyse the data and compare the
results of an interval-censored approach with the conventional approach, in
order to examine whether the conclusion might be altered depending on the
approach.
CASE REPORTS
A re-analysis of a randomized clinical trial for gastric cancer using interval censoring
Department of Surgery, Aichi Prefectural Hospital, Japan.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Sakamoto and S. Teramukai Data Handling in Cancer Clinical Trials--How We Can Minimize Potential Biases Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2002; 32(1): 1 - 2. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
