Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, M
Right arrow Articles by Inuzuka, K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, M
Right arrow Articles by Inuzuka, K
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 28, Issue 1 30-35, Copyright © 1998 by Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Evaluation of the death certificate follow-up method for the analysis of survival rate: data from Aichi Prefecture, Japan

M Inoue, K Tajima, S Tominaga, T Sugiura and K Inuzuka
Division of Epidemiology, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan.

To evaluate the use, for studies on survival, of death certificates from population-based cancer registries in Japan, we compared 5-year survival rates by two different methods: passive, derived from death certificates, and active, using family register systems. Registered cancer cases from Aichi Prefectural Cancer Registry were used as a model. The study subjects comprised 9244 cancer patients (3830 males and 5414 females) newly diagnosed at the Aichi Cancer Center Hospital and recorded in the Aichi Prefectural Cancer Registry between 1983 and 1991. The passive follow-up method, using death certificates, identified 87-89% of deaths among the study subjects. The proportion of deaths which were not identified by the passive follow-up method did not vary greatly with age or gender, but was higher among patients in the earlier rather than the later stages of cancer. Overall, the absolute and relative effects of unregistered deaths on apparent survival rate vary with the absolute survival rate. The absolute and relative differences between the survival rates calculated by the two methods are explained more clearly when data are analyzed by cancer site. The results of the present study provide useful information for interpreting the survival rate following diagnosis of cancer estimated by the passive follow-up method, i.e. using death certificates from a population-based cancer registry.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.