Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Egawa, S
Right arrow Articles by et, al.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Egawa, S
Right arrow Articles by et, al.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 28, Issue 10 590-596, Copyright © 1998 by Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research


CASE REPORTS

Genotype-phenotype correlation of patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 in Japan

S Egawa, H Futami, K Takasaki, M Iihara, T Okamoto, M Kanbe, T Ohi, Y Saio, A Miyauchi, Y Takiyama, M Koga, K Miyanaga, K Inoue, S Mitsuyama, Y Nomura, H Takei, S Mugiya, O Ishida, F Zeze, S Shakutsui, H Inoue, H Oya, A Yoshimura, S Ishizuka, K Yamaguchi and al. et
Growth Factor Division, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.

BACKGROUND: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN 2) is a hereditary syndrome characterized by medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), pheochromocytoma and hyperparathyroidism. MEN 2 is caused predominantly by germ-line mutations of the RET proto-oncogene. This study aimed to clarify the genotype-phenotype correlation in MEN 2 patients in Japan in order to modify the clinical management according to the genotype. METHODS: Constitutive DNA of 64 MEN 2 patients (48 kindreds) were searched for mutations at exons 10, 11, 13, 14 and 16 of the RET proto-oncogene using polymerase chain reaction-single strand conformation polymorphism (PCR-SSCP), direct sequencing and restriction enzyme digestion. The clinical characteristics of the patients were obtained from a previous nationwide questionnaire survey. RESULTS: Overall, 62 (96.9%) out of 64 patients had a germ-line point mutation at the hot spots. MTC and pheochromocytoma occurred equally in every genotype except C630S. Specific genotype had a correlation between tumor size and age at the operation for MTC or extent of MTC, i.e. C618S developed late onset type of MTC as compared with that of C634R, C634Y and M918T. Small MTC in C634R may be less aggressive than those in C634Y and M918T. CONCLUSIONS: DNA testing has good clinical implications for the management of patients with MEN 2 and the timing and operative procedures of thyroidectomy can be modified according to the genotype.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
S Jindrichova, J Vcelak, P Vlcek, M Neradilova, J Nemec, and B Bendlova
Screening of six risk exons of the RET proto-oncogene in families with medullary thyroid carcinoma in the Czech Republic
J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2004; 183(2): 257 - 265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
G. Szinnai, C. Meier, P. Komminoth, and U. W. Zumsteg
Review of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2A in Children: Therapeutic Results of Early Thyroidectomy and Prognostic Value of Codon Analysis
Pediatrics, February 1, 2003; 111(2): e132 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
A. Nakao, Y. Naomoto, M. Kataoka, M. Haisa, K. Kataoka, S. Saitoh, T. Fujiwara, T. Yamatsuji, K. Shigemitsu, T. Umeoka, et al.
A Family of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2A with the RET Proto-oncogene Mutation in Codon 618 (Cys{->}Arg)
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2001; 31(4): 157 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.