Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Motomura, K
Right arrow Articles by Koyama, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Motomura, K
Right arrow Articles by Koyama, H
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 29, Issue 12 604-607, Copyright © 1999 by Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Sentinel node biopsy guided by indocyanine green dye in breast cancer patients

K Motomura, H Inaji, Y Komoike, T Kasugai, S Noguchi and H Koyama
Department of Surgery, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Japan.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate whether dye-guided sentinel node biopsy is a useful indicator of axillary node involvement in breast cancer patients and whether clinicopathological features affect its success in identifying sentinel nodes. METHODS: Sentinel node biopsy was performed in patients with stage I or II breast cancer using an indocyanin green dye-guided method. RESULTS: We could identify sentinel nodes in 127 (73.8%) of 172 patients. The mean number of sentinel nodes per patient was 1.7 (range, 1-8) and the mean node size was 9.3 mm (range, 3.0-28.0 mm). Of the 127 patients, 40 (31.5%) also had axillary node involvement. In 16 (40.0%) of these, the sentinel node was the only node involved. There was concordance between sentinel node and axillary node status in 122 (96.1%) of the 127 patients. Success in identifying sentinel nodes was not affected by tumor size, operative procedure, histological type of tumor or tumor location; however, the success rate was significantly lower in patients with axillary node involvement (65.7 vs 79.0% in axillary node-negative patients, p = 0.039) and the presence or absence of lymphatic or vascular invasion in the tumor (63.8 vs 78.9% in patients without lymphatic or vascular invasion, p = 0.043). Sentinel nodes could also be identified significantly more frequently in patients under 50 years old (83.3%) than in those over 50 years old (64.8%, p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel node biopsy guided by indocyanin green dye is an easy technique with an acceptable success rate in detecting sentinel nodes and predicting axillary nodal status. Axillary node status, the presence or absence of lymphatic or vascular invasion in the tumor and patient age affect its success in identifying sentinel nodes.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. M. Sevick-Muraca, R. Sharma, J. C. Rasmussen, M. V. Marshall, J. A. Wendt, H. Q. Pham, E. Bonefas, J. P. Houston, L. Sampath, K. E. Adams, et al.
Imaging of Lymph Flow in Breast Cancer Patients after Microdose Administration of a Near-Infrared Fluorophore: Feasibility Study
Radiology, March 1, 2008; 246(3): 734 - 741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
G.-C. Hsu, C.-H. Ku, J.-C. Yu, C.-B. Hsieh, C.-P. Yu, and T.-Y. Chao
Application of intraoperative ultrasound to nonsentinel node assessment in primary breast cancer.
Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2006; 12(12): 3746 - 3753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.