Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsuda, H
Right arrow Articles by Watanabe, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tsuda, H
Right arrow Articles by Watanabe, T
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 29, Issue 2 68-73, Copyright © 1999 by Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The efficacy and limitations of repeated slide conferences for improving interobserver agreement when judging nuclear atypia of breast cancer. The Japan National Surgical Adjuvant Study of Breast Cancer (NSAS-BC) Pathology Section

H Tsuda, F Akiyama, M Kurosumi, G Sakamoto and T Watanabe
Pathology Division, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan. hstsuda@gan2.ncc.go.jp

BACKGROUND: The pathology section of the Japan National Surgical Adjuvant Study of Breast Cancer protocol study was set up to establish histological criteria for assessing high-risk node-negative breast cancers and standardize the subjective criteria used by collaborating pathologists for nuclear grading of cancers. METHODS: In order to standardize the nuclear atypia criteria, five slide conferences were held. A total of 57 observers assigned nuclear atypia scores to 119 breast carcinomas that were presented using a slide projector or a TV monitor and discussed their histological findings. The percentage interobserver agreements per tumor and per conference and kappa value per conference were estimated and compared among the conferences. The percentage intraobserver reproducibility per tumor between the last two conferences was compared with the percentage interobserver agreement for 20 tumors. The kappa value was also calculated for each of 27 observers to evaluate scoring reproducibility. RESULTS: The percentage interobserver agreement per conference was constant (75-78%) throughout the five meetings and the rate of tumors with > 80% agreement per tumor became higher in later conferences. The kappa value was 0.42, 0.25, 0.42, 0.51 and 0.50 for the first, second, third, fourth and fifth conferences, respectively. The tumors with a lower percentage interobserver agreement also had a lower percentage intraobserver reproducibility and such scoring variations were attributed to the intermediate nature of the degree of tumor atypia. In 26 of 27 observers, intraobserver agreement for 20 tumors was estimated from the kappa value to range from moderate to almost perfect. CONCLUSION: We concluded that the repeated slide conferences conducted by the pathology section were an effective means of standardizing the subjective histopathological criteria used to assess tumors. However, the achievement of a good scoring agreement would be difficult for tumors with an intermediate degree of atypia.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
T. Watanabe, M. Sano, S. Takashima, T. Kitaya, Y. Tokuda, M. Yoshimoto, N. Kohno, K. Nakagami, H. Iwata, K. Shimozuma, et al.
Oral Uracil and Tegafur Compared With Classic Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, Fluorouracil As Postoperative Chemotherapy in Patients With Node-Negative, High-Risk Breast Cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Study for Breast Cancer 01 Trial
J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2009; 27(9): 1368 - 1374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
A Paradiso, I O Ellis, F A Zito, E Marubini, S Pizzamiglio, and P Verderio
Short- and long-term effects of a training session on pathologists' performance: the INQAT experience for histological grading in breast cancer
J. Clin. Pathol., March 1, 2009; 62(3): 279 - 281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
S. Kyoda, S. Kinoshita, H. Takeyama, K. Uchida, and T. Morikawa
HER-2 Protein Overexpression in Metastatic Breast Carcinoma Found at Autopsy
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2008; 38(11): 743 - 747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
E. Iwamoto, T. Fukutomi, and S. Akashi-Tanaka
Validation and Problems of St-Gallen Recommendations of Adjuvant Therapy for Node-negative Invasive Breast Cancer in Japanese Patients
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2001; 31(6): 259 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.