Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sasaki, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kato, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sasaki, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kato, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 30:337-342 (2000)
© 2000 Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research

The Clinical Utility of Measuring Total PSA, PSA Density, {gamma}-Seminoprotein and {gamma}-Seminoprotein/Total PSA in Prostate Cancer Prediction

Ryusei Sasaki1, Tomonori Habuchi1, Kazunari Sato1, Toshiya Akao1, Hideaki Kakinuma1, Zhang Li-Qing1, Wang Lizhong1, Shigeki Matsuo2, Shuuhei Sasaki2, Osamu Ogawa3 and Tetsuro Kato1

,+ 1Department of Urology, Akita University School of Medicine, Akita, 2Akita Municipal Hospital, Akita and 3Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan

Background: To evaluate whether serum total prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA density (serum total PSA level divided by prostate volume), {gamma}-seminoprotein and {gamma}-seminoprotein/total PSA ratio could predict prostate cancer (PCa) prior to biopsy.

Methods: A total of 316 consecutive patients who had undergone transrectal prostate biopsy and/or transurethral resection were examined. The prostate volume was determined by trans­rectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and the ability of the above-mentioned four variables to distinguish PCa from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) was evaluated.

Results: PCa was detected in 61 cases. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that both the PSA density and serum total PSA were the most useful predictors of PCa among the four variables. For the patients with a serum total PSA level of 4.1–10.0 ng/ml, PSA density was significantly more accurate than total PSA (p < 0.005). An optimum PSA density value of 0.18 was chosen as a cutoff because it showed the highest sum of sensitivity and specificity, 92 and 54%, respectively. Using this PSA density cutoff, the number of biopsies could have been reduced to 57 from 63% when compared with a PSA density of 0.15.

Conclusions: PSA density was significantly more accurate than other variables in predicting PCa. To avoid unnecessary biopsies, the PSA density cutoff value of 0.18 would be recommendable for determining a prostate biopsy for Japanese males with a serum total PSA level of 4.1–10.0 ng/ml.

+ For reprints and all correspondence: Tetsuro Kato, Department of Urology, Akita University School of Medicine, 1–1–1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.