Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, J.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, B. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yang, J.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, B. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 31:1-6 (2001)
© 2001 Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research

Comparison of Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis of Sentinel Node with Preoperative Positron Emission Tomography in the Diagnosis of Axillary Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Patients

Jung-Hyun Yang1, Seok Jin Nam1, Tae Seung Lee2, Hae Kyung Lee1, Sung Hoo Jung3 and Byung Tae Kim4,+

Departments of 1Surgery and 4Nuclear Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, 2Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital and 3Chonbuk National University, Seoul, Korea

Background: Although axillary lymph node status is an important prognostic factor and axillary dissection is regarded as the gold standard for staging, it requires radical surgery which is accompanied by considerable postoperative problems such as lymphedema. This study was carried out to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative positron emission tomography (PET) and intraoperative frozen biopsy of sentinel lymphadenectomy (SLND) in detecting axillary lymph node metastasis.

Methods: We studied 18 patients who had preoperative PET and SLND for breast cancer in the Department of Surgery at Samsung Medical Center. They all had preoperative PET with a radiolabeled glucose analogue ([18F]FDG) to visualize primary tumors and metastatic nodes. Isosulphan blue dye was used for intraoperative SLND. Frozen and permanent biopsies were then compared after full axillary dissection.

Results: In 18 cases, six had positive metastatic nodes in the permanent biopsy of full axillary dissection but were negative in three cases by preoperative PET. There was one false negative result by frozen biopsy of SLND which was later shown to be positive by permanent biopsy. The sensitivity and specificity of SLND and PET for detecting axillary node metastasis were 83, 100% and 50, 100%, respectively.

Conclusion: Although both methods are good for axillary nodal status, the intraoperative frozen biopsy result of SLND was superior to preoperative PET in our preliminary study.

+ For reprints and all correspondence: Jung-Hyun Yang, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, 50 Ilwon-Dong, Kangnam-Ku, Seoul, 135–710 Korea. E-mail: jhyang@smc.samsung.co.kr


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
N. C. Hodgson and K. Y. Gulenchyn
Is There a Role for Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer Staging?
J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2008; 26(5): 712 - 720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. M. Blodgett, C. C. Meltzer, and D. W. Townsend
PET/CT: Form and Function
Radiology, February 1, 2007; 242(2): 360 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. M. Rohren, T. G. Turkington, and R. E. Coleman
Clinical Applications of PET in Oncology
Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 305 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.