Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fuwa, N.
Right arrow Articles by Morita, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fuwa, N.
Right arrow Articles by Morita, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 31:589-595 (2001)
© 2001 Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research

Therapeutic Results of Alternating Chemoradiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Cancer using Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil: Its Usefulness and Controversial Points

Nobukazu Fuwa, Yoshiyuki Ito, Takeshi Kodaira, Akira Matsumoto, Minoru Kamata, Kazuhisa Furutani, Hiroyuki Tatibana, Masahiro Sasaoka and Kozo Morita+

Department of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan

Background: The present study was conducted to evaluate the therapeutic results of alternating chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC).

Methods: The subjects consisted of six patients with stage III nasopharyngeal cancer and 26 patients with stage IV nasopharyngeal cancer. Using 6 MV photons, radiotherapy was performed at an exposure of 1.8–2.0 Gy five times per week. That is, a total absorbed dose of 36–40 Gy was irradiated between the base of the skull and supraclavicular fossa. After decreasing the irradiation field, an absorbed dose of 26–30 Gy was additionally given thereafter. One course of chemotherapy consisted of the administration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) at a dose of 700 mg/m2/24 h for 5 days (days 1–5) and cisplatin (CDDP) at a dose of 50 mg/m2/24 h for 2 days (days 6–7) and a total of 2–3 courses of chemotherapy were performed. During the alternating chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy was performed initially and 3–5 days after completing the chemotherapy, radiotherapy was performed for 3–4 weeks. Thereafter, chemotherapy and radiotherapy were performed alternately.

Results: The scheduled courses of alternating chemoradiotherapy were completed in 30 (94%) of 32 patients. Although one patient developed shock induced by metal allergy to CDDP, no severe adverse effects were noted in any other patients. In these 32 patients, the overall 5-year survival rate was 75% (95% confidence interval: 60–90%) and the progression-free survival rate was 63% (95% CI: 46–89%).

Conclusions: This method of alternating chemoradiotherapy yielded higher or at least similar survival rates and lower toxicities than concurrent chemoradiotherapy and is worth trying in a multi-institutional study.

+ For reprints and all correspondence: Nobukazu Fuwa, Department of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1–1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Japan. E-mail: nfuwa@aichi-cc.jp


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
W. J. Maloney and M. A. Weinberg
A Comprehensive Analysis of Babe Ruth's Head and Neck Cancer
J Am Dent Assoc, July 1, 2008; 139(7): 926 - 932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
N. Fuwa, T. Kodaira, H. Tachibana, T. Nakamura, and T. Daimon
Dose Escalation Study of Nedaplatin with 5-Fluorouracil in Combination with Alternating Radiotherapy in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2007; 37(3): 161 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.