Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nakanishi, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nakanishi, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 31:246-250 (2001)
© 2001 Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research

Radiotherapy Combined with Nimustine Hydrochloride and Etoposide for Malignant Gliomas: Results of a Pilot Study

Minoru Tanaka1, Soichiro Shibui1, Kazuhiro Nomura1 and Yukihiro Nakanishi2,+,§

1Neurosurgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital and 2Pathology Division, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan

Background: The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of radio-chemotherapy using nimustine hydrochloride (ACNU) and etoposide (VP-16) for malignant gliomas.

Methods: From 1985 through 1998, 33 consecutive patients with supratentorial malignant gliomas were treated by a single protocol. The mean age was 45.8 years (range 12–76 years). The median Karnofsky performance score was 80 (range 60–100). There were 14 anaplastic astrocytomas (AA) and 19 glioblastomas (GBM). Following surgery, 60 Gy of radiotherapy combined with an adjuvant chemotherapy using ACNU (80 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 36) and etoposide (80 mg/m2 i.v. days 2, 3, 37 and 38) was administered. On completion of the initial radio-chemotherapy, a single cycle of the same chemotherapy was repeated every 6–8 weeks until tumor progression or for 2 years at the maximum.

Results: All 33 patients tolerated treatment. We observed complete response in five cases (15%), partial response in nine (27%), no change in 11 (33%) and progressive disease in eight (24%). The response rate (>50% reduction) was therefore 42.4%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) for all 33 patients was 8.4 months: 7.8 months for GBMs and 13.5 months for AAs. There was no significant difference in PFS between GBM and AA patients (p = 0.14). The median survival time of all 33 patients was 21.1 months: 16.2 months for GBMs and 49.9 months for AAs. The difference in survival between AA and GBM was statistically significant (p = 0.0019). Myelosuppression appeared in 11 patients: grade 2 hematological toxicity in 10 cases (30%) and grade 3 in one case (3%). We did not observe any gastrointestinal toxicity. Multivariate analysis showed that age and initial histological grade had independent prognostic significance.

Conclusion: RT with ACNU and etoposide are feasible and well tolerated and the treatment results were comparable to the best results reported in the literature.

+ For reprints and all correspondence: Minoru Tanaka, Neurosurgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 1–1, Tsukiji 5-chome, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan. E-mail: mntanaka-nsu@umin.ac.jp

§ Abbreviations: ACNU, nimustine hydrochloride; VP-16, etoposide; AA, anaplastic astrocytomas; GBM, glioblastomas; RT, radiotherapy; KPS, Karnofsky performance status; NCI, National Cancer Institute; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; NC, no change; PD, progressive disease; Vpost-op, post-operative tumor volume; Vpost-tx, post-treatment volume; PFS, progression-free survival


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.