Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sato, K.
Right arrow Articles by Mochizuki, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sato, K.
Right arrow Articles by Mochizuki, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 32:403-406 (2002)
© 2002 Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research

Clinically Useful Detection Criteria for Sentinel Nodes in Patients with Breast Cancer Using a Radioisotope Technique

Kazuhiko Sato1, Kuniyoshi Tamaki1, Takashi Shigekawa1, Hitoshi Tsuda2, Shigeru Kosuda3, Shoichi Kusano3, Hoshio Hiraide4 and Hidetaka Mochizuki1,+

1 Department of Surgery I, 2 Department of Pathology II, 3 Department of Radiology and 4 Research Institute, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan

Background: The radioisotope technique has been used to identify sentinel nodes in patients with breast cancer. However, quantitative analysis of the radioactivity for detecting the sentinel nodes was not previously examined. In this study, we considered a clinically useful criterion for detecting sentinel nodes by a detailed analysis of 312 sentinel nodes using the radioisotope technique.

Patients and methods: Patients with T1–2, N0 breast cancer were eligible for this study. The nodes with the highest radioactivity after injection of technetium-labeled tin colloids were identified as hot nodes. The radioactivities of the hot nodes and the background counts of the axillary basin were examined in order to establish new criteria for detecting the sentinel nodes.

Results: Between May 1997 and December 2001, 312 hot nodes were detected in 183 of 186 patients (98.4%). Since the false-negative rate for metastasis in hot nodes was only 2.1% (1/48), they could serve as sentinel nodes to predict the nodal status. However, there was a wide distribution of the hot nodes and the background in terms of absolute counts and a criterion for the sentinel nodes could not be established in terms of the absolute counts. When we adopted the criterion of sentinel nodes with a >=100 count ratio in relation to the background, only 169 hot nodes (54.3%) met our definition. When the criterion of a >=10 count ratio was adopted, all hot nodes met our definition and all other nodes remained non-sentinel nodes.

Conclusion: The criterion for defining sentinel nodes in our method is a node with a >=10 count ratio with respect to the background. It is recommended that an analysis based on such objective data should be investigated in order to provide surgeons with more accurate and clinically useful criteria for detecting sentinel nodes.

+ For reprints and all correspondence: Kazuhiko Sato, Department of Surgery I, National Defense Medical College, 3–2 Namiki, Tokorozawa, Saitama 359–8513, Japan. E-mail: sato-k-a@mtg.biglobe.ne.jp


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
S. Ueda, H. Tsuda, H. Asakawa, T. Shigekawa, K. Fukatsu, N. Kondo, M. Yamamoto, Y. Hama, K. Tamura, J. Ishida, et al.
Clinicopathological and Prognostic Relevance of Uptake Level using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Fusion Imaging (18F-FDG PET/CT) in Primary Breast Cancer
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2008; 38(4): 250 - 258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.