Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wada, N.
Right arrow Articles by Moriyama, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wada, N.
Right arrow Articles by Moriyama, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 34:113-117 (2004)
© 2004 Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research

Evaluation of Intraoperative Frozen Section Diagnosis of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer

Noriaki Wada1, Shigeru Imoto1, Takahiro Hasebe2, Atsushi Ochiai2, Satoshi Ebihara3 and Noriyuki Moriyama4,+

1 Breast Surgery Division and 3 Head and Neck Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 2 Pathology Division, National Cancer Center Research Institute East and 4 Diagnostic Radiology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan

Background: Intraoperative frozen sections (FS) of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) can be used to detect metastatic disease, allowing immediate axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). However, pathological inconsistency in the SLNs diagnosis is sometimes encountered when the results of FS and permanent sections are compared. The purpose of this study was to reveal the usefulness and limitations of FS for the diagnosis of SLNs in patients with breast cancer.

Methods: We reviewed the results for 569 patients with breast cancer at stage 0–II who underwent a sentinel node biopsy between February 1998 and December 2002. SLNs were analyzed using standard FS procedures and a single section stained with hematoxylin and eosin was examined. Patients determined to have positive SLNs based on the results of the FS diagnosis immediately underwent ALND. Permanent sections were later prepared from the remaining frozen tissues and examined using hematoxylin and eosin staining without additional immunohistochemical staining.

Results: Seven cases (1%) with atypical cells were found in the FS diagnosis intraoperatively, which were counted as ‘negative’ by the following analysis. The final pathology results showed metastasis in the SLN sections in 159 patients (28%), of whom 26 were diagnosed as negative by the FS diagnosis. Accuracy, specificity and the false-negative rate were 95, 100 and 16%, respectively. The mean size of the nodal metastases in the false-negative cases was significantly smaller than that in the true-positive cases (n = 72) (P < 0.01). False-negative rates for T1b, T1c and T2 were 33, 19 and 14%, respectively. The rate of micrometastasis in T1 (43%) was significantly higher than that of T2 (13%) (P < 0.01).

Conclusions: FS diagnosis for SLNs is reliable. Patients with negative SLNs by the FS diagnosis can avoid reoperation for ALND. However, FS may fail to detect micrometastases, especially in cases with small tumors.

+ For reprints and all correspondence: Noriaki Wada, Breast Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6–5–1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8577, Japan. E-mail: nowada{at}east.ncc.go.jp


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
A. Perhavec, N. Besic, M. Hocevar, and J. Zgajnar
Touch Imprint Cytology of the Sentinel Lymph Nodes Might Not Be Indicated in Early Breast Cancer Patients with Ultrasonically Uninvolved Axillary Lymph Nodes
Ann. Surg. Oncol., August 1, 2008; 15(8): 2257 - 2262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
K. Shimazu, Y. Tamaki, T. Taguchi, F. Tsukamoto, T. Kasugai, and S. Noguchi
Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis of Sentinel Lymph Node in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2008; 15(6): 1717 - 1722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
N. Arora, D. Martins, T. L. Huston, P. Christos, S. Hoda, M. P. Osborne, A. J. Swistel, E. Tousimis, P. I. Pressman, and R. M. Simmons
Sentinel Node Positivity Rates With and Without Frozen Section for Breast Cancer
Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2008; 15(1): 256 - 261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
INT J SURG PATHOLHome page
C. Teixeira Soares, U. Frederigue-Junior, and L. A. de Luca
Anatomopathological Analysis of Sentinel and Nonsentinel Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer: Hematoxylin-Eosin Versus Immunohistochemistry
International Journal of Surgical Pathology, October 1, 2007; 15(4): 358 - 368.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.