Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ogawa, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ogawa, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 34:131-136 (2004)
© 2004 Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research

Radical External Beam Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer in Japan: Preliminary Results of the Changing Trends in the Patterns of Care Process Survey between 1996–1998 and 1999–2001

Kazuhiko Ogawa1,2, Katsumasa Nakamura3, Tomonari Sasaki3, Tokihiro Yamamoto4, Masahiko Koizumi5, Toshihiko Inoue6 and Teruki Teshima4 the Japanese Patterns of Care Study Working Subgroup on Prostate Cancer+

1 Department of Radiology, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, 2 Department of Molecular and Surgical Oncology, Medical Institute of Bioregulation, Kyushu University, Beppu, Kyushu, 3 Department of Clinical Radiology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, 4 Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Osaka University, Osaka, 5 Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka and 6 Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan

Objective: To report the preliminary results of a study to delineate the changing trends in radical external beam radiotherapy usage for prostate cancer between the 1996–1998 and 1999–2001 survey periods in Japan.

Methods: The 1996–1998 Patterns of Care Study (PCS) and the 1999–2001 PCS in Japan reviewed the detailed information on 694 patients with prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy. Of them, 298 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with radical external beam radiotherapy in A1 and B1 institutions were selected for analysis (1996–1998 PCS, 117 patients; 1999–2001 PCS, 181 patients).

Results: High-risk prostate cancer (defined as T3–T4 tumors, a pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level >20 ng/ml, and/or poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma) was diagnosed in 82.1% of the patients in the 1996–1998 PCS and in significantly less (70.2%) of those in the 1999–2001 PCS (P = 0.021). Moreover, significantly earlier T stages (T1–T2: 49.7%) and more well-differentiated tumors (24.7%) were found between 1999 and 2001 than between 1996 and 1998 (T1–T2: 31.9%, well-differentiated tumors: 13.9%). Although only 6.1% of patients were treated with radiotherapy by patient’s choice in 1996–1998, a larger proportion (32.2%) chose this treatment in 1999–2001. The median radiation dose was 65.0 Gy (range, 24–74 Gy) in 1996–1998 and increased to 69 Gy (range, 14–80 Gy) in 1999–2001. The percentage of radiation doses <60 Gy was 20.5% in 1996–1998 but only 2.2% in 1999–2001. Moreover, the incidence of treatment with total doses of >=70 Gy was higher in 1999–2001 (43.9%) than in 1996–1998 (19.7%). These increased radiation doses were predominantly observed in B1 institutions. Although the usage of >=10 MV was significantly increased in 1999–2001 (82.0%) compared with that in 1996–1998 (65.8%), conformal therapy administered to 52.1% of patients in 1996–1998 was almost the same (55.8%) in 1999–2001. The median number of full-time equivalent (FTE) radiation oncologists (2.4 in A1 institutions and only 0.6 in B1 institutions) in 1996–1998 increased slightly in 1999–2001 (2.7 in A1 institutions, 0.7 in B1 institutions), but remained low in B1 institutions.

Conclusions: In Japan, there is a trend to fewer high-risk prostate cancer patients being treated with radical external beam radiotherapy. An increasing percentage of patients chose radiotherapy and also increased radiation doses, which might reflect the growing acceptance of radical external beam radiotherapy as a treatment of choice for prostate cancer in Japan. Therefore, to optimize delivery of radiotherapy, more advanced equipment and more FTE radiation oncologists are warranted.

+ For reprints and all correspondence: Kazuhiko Ogawa, Department of Molecular and Surgical Oncology, Medical Institute of Bioregulation, Kyushu University, Tsurumihara 4546, Beppu 874-0838, Japan. E-mail: kogawa{at}med.u-ryukyu.ac.jp


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
T. Sasaki, K. Nakamura, K. Ogawa, H. Onishi, Y. Otani, M. Koizumi, Y. Shioyama, T. Teshima, and The Japanese Patterns of Care Study Working Subgro
Postoperative Radiotherapy for Patients with Prostate Cancer in Japan; Changing Trends in National Practice between 1996-98 and 1999-2001: Patterns of Care Study for Prostate Cancer
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2006; 36(10): 649 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
K. Ogawa, K. Nakamura, H. Onishi, T. Sasaki, M. Koizumi, Y. Shioyama, T. Komiyama, Y. Miyabe, T. Teshima, and Japanese Patterns of Care Study Working Subgroup o
Radical External Beam Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer in Japan: Results of the 1999-2001 Patterns of Care Process Survey
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2006; 36(1): 40 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
K. Hashine, K. Numata, K. Azuma, Y. Sumiyoshi, and M. Kataoka
Long-term Outcomes of 60 Gy Conventional Radiotherapy Combined with Androgen Deprivation for Localized or Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2005; 35(11): 655 - 659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.