Skip Navigation

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 2004 34(8):445-451; doi:10.1093/jjco/hyh080
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yu, Y.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Kao, C.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yu, Y.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Kao, C.-H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© 2004 Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research

The Use of Dual Phase 201Tl SPECT for Differentiating Pulmonary Malignancies from Benign Lesions

Yang-Hao Yu1, Wu-Huei Hsu1, Nan-Yung Hsu2, Tze-Yi Lin3, Te-Chun Hsia1, Shung-Shung Sun4 and Chia-Hung Kao4

1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, 2 Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, 3 Department of Pathology and 4 Department of Nuclear Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

For reprints and all correspondence: Wu-Huei Hsu, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan. E-mail: hsuwh{at}www.cmuh.org.tw

Received March 2, 2004; accepted June 1, 2004

Background: This study examines the usefulness of thallium-201 single photon emission computed tomography (201Tl SPECT) in differentiating pulmonary malignancies from benign lesions by using dual phase 201Tl scintigraphy.

Methods: One hundred and six patients with thoracic lesions and confirmed diagnoses were assessed by 201Tl chest SPECT examinations; of these 106 enrolled thoracic lesions, 59 were malignancies and 47 were benign lesions. Dual phase 201Tl SPECT was performed with an early image acquired at 10–20 min and a delayed image at 2–3 h after intravenous injection of 2–3 mCi of 201Tl. The results of 201Tl SPECT images were classified as either malignant or benign lesions by visual interpretation: the lesion was interpreted as positive for malignancy if the uptake of 201Tl in the lung lesion in the delayed phase was increased or persistent as compared with that in the early phase image; otherwise, it was considered as a benign lesion. Simultaneously, the traditional method of retention index (RI) was also calculated to help in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary lesions. Then, both methods of dual phase 201Tl SPECT, visual reading and traditional RI, were compared to differentiate pulmonary malignancies from benign lesions.

Results: Analyzing the image results, we found that dual phase 201Tl SPECT could differentiate pulmonary malignancies from benign lesions with a sensitivity of 83%, a specificity of 91% and an accuracy of 87%. Moreover, by using the traditional RI method of 201Tl SPECT, it could differentiate pulmonary malignancy from benign lesions with a sensitivity of 79.3%, a specificity of 80.8% and an accuracy of 80%.

Conclusions: We conclude that using dual phase 201Tl SPECT with visual interpretation is a simpler and potentially more effective method for differentiating pulmonary malignancies from benign lesions, with results compatible with the traditional RI method of 201Tl SPECT.

Key Words: thallium-201 • SPECT • lung cancer • pulmonary lesions • retention index


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.