Skip Navigation


Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology Advance Access originally published online on November 8, 2005
Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 2005 35(11):660-666; doi:10.1093/jjco/hyi183
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/11/660    most recent
hyi183v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Namiki, S.
Right arrow Articles by Arai, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Namiki, S.
Right arrow Articles by Arai, Y.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© 2005 Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research

Intraoperative Electrophysiological Confirmation of Neurovascular Bundle Preservation during Radical Prostatectomy: Long-term Assessment of Urinary and Sexual Function

Shunichi Namiki1, Akito Terai2, Haruo Nakagawa1, Yoshihiro Ikeda1, Seiichi Saito1, Makoto Satoh1, Shigeto Ishidoya1, Koji Yoshimura2, Kentaro Ichioka2 and Yoichi Arai1

1 Department of Urology, Tohoku Graduate University School of Medicine, Sendai and 2 Department of Urology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan

For reprints and all correspondence: Shunichi Namiki, Department of Urology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryomachi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan. E-mail: namikin{at}uro.med.tohoku.ac.jp

Received July 3, 2005; accepted September 15, 2005

Objective: We investigated the longitudinal recovery of urinary and sexual function after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RP) using an intraoperative electrophysiological test to confirm the functional preservation of the neurovascular bundle (NVB).

Methods: A total of 70 patients who underwent RP for localized prostate cancer were prospectively enrolled in our survey. During RP, electrophysiological testing was performed to confirm the NVB preservation. The NVB was electrostimulated and the responses were observed by monitoring the intracavernous or intraurethral pressure changes. All patients were classified into three groups according to the degree of nerve-sparing [a bilateral nerve-sparing group (BNS), a unilateral nerve-sparing group (UNS) and a non-nerve-sparing group (NNS)] based on the macroanatomical as well as the electrophysiological assessment. Both urinary and sexual function were measured before and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after RP by a self-administered questionnaire.

Results: The concordance rate of nerve-sparing or non-nerve-sparing between the electrophysiological and macroanatomical assessment was 80%. According to the electrophysiological data, the BNS maintained significantly better urinary function at 3 months after RP than the NNS and UNS. After 6 months, each group had almost recovered continence. When considering sexual function, the BNS showed better sexual function scores than the NNS throughout the post-operative periods and the UNS at 2 years. According to the macroanatomical assessment, however, these differences were significant.

Conclusions: Nerve-sparing RP as confirmed by intraoperative electrophysiological test may contribute significantly to the early recovery of continence and greater rate of sexual function after RP.

Key Words: prostate cancer • radical prostatectomy • erectile stimulation • nervous system • outcome assessment


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.