© 2006 Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations and Response to Chemotherapy in Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
1 Department of Internal Medicine and 2 Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Boramae Hospital and 4 Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University and College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
For reprints and all correspondence: Dong-Wan Kim, Assistant Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Yongon-Dong, Chongno-Gu, Seoul, 110-744, South Korea; E-mail: dwkimmd{at}chol.com
Received December 12, 2005; accepted February 24, 2006
Background: The association of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations with the response to conventional cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents in non-small-cell lung cancer patients has not been investigated. We retrospectively analyzed the associations between response to chemotherapy and molecular markers associated with gefitinib responsiveness including EGFR mutations.
Methods: EGFR (exons 18, 19 and 21) and K-ras mutations (exon 2) were studied by direct sequencing and p-Erk and p-Akt expressions were studied by immunohistochemistry in archival paraffin embedded tissues. Response rate (RR) and time-to-progression (TTP) of prior chemotherapy by platinum, paclitaxel and gemcitabine were analyzed with respect to the presence of EGFR and K-ras mutations, and p-Erk and p-Akt expressions.
Results: Of 90 patients investigated, 75 received platinums and 45 received paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy agents. The RRS and TTPS of platinum- and paclitaxel-containing regimens were not affected by EGFR or K-ras mutations, nor by p-Erk or p-Akt expression. Fifty-seven patients received gemcitabine as first- or second-line chemotherapy. RR was not affected by EGFR or K-ras mutations or by p-Akt expression. However, all responders to gemcitabine exhibited (+) p-Erk expression [RR 30.6% for p-Erk (+) versus 0% for p-Erk (–), P = 0.01]. TTP was not affected by EGFR or K-ras mutations or by p-Erk or p-Akt expression.
Conclusions: EGFR mutations did not affect response to conventional chemotherapeutic agents, namely platinums, paclitaxel and gemcitabine. Our results also suggest that it may be undesirable to use gemcitabine in patients with tumors not expressing p-Erk.
Key Words: EGFR • mutation • K-ras • Erk • Akt
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. G. Azzoli, S. Baker Jr, S. Temin, W. Pao, T. Aliff, J. Brahmer, D. H. Johnson, J. L. Laskin, G. Masters, D. Milton, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update on Chemotherapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., December 20, 2009; 27(36): 6251 - 6266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Steiner, C. Joynes, R. Bassi, S. Wang, J. R. Tonra, Y. R. Hadari, and D. J. Hicklin Tumor Growth Inhibition with Cetuximab and Chemotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Xenografts Expressing Wild-type and Mutated Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2007; 13(5): 1540 - 1551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|