Skip Navigation

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 2007 37(9):652-657; doi:10.1093/jjco/hym089
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gotoh, M.
Right arrow Articles by Katsu, K.-i.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gotoh, M.
Right arrow Articles by Katsu, K.-i.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© 2007 Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor is a Possible Predictor of Sensitivity to Chemoradiotherapy in the Primary Lesion of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Masahiro Gotoh, Hiroya Takiuchi, Shin-ichiro Kawabe, Shunsuke Ohta, Takayuki Kii, Shin Kuwakado and Ken-ichi Katsu

Department of Internal Medicine II, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka Japan

For reprints and all correspondence: Masahiro Gotoh, Department of Internal Medicine II, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki, Osaka 569-0802, Japan E-mail: in2030{at}poh.osaka-med.ac.jp

Received October 23, 2006; accepted May 28, 2007

Background: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is currently performed for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Some reports have revealed that patients who responded well to CRT had favorable outcomes, whereas poor responders conversely showed a worse prognosis. The aim of this study was to identify molecular markers predicting sensitivity to CRT.

Methods: We reviewed 62 patients with T3-4, N-any, and M-any esophageal SCC treated with definitive CRT. The regimen comprised protracted 5-fluorouracil infusion and a 2-h infusion of cisplatinum combined with radiation therapy (2 Gy/day) at a total radiation dose of 60 Gy. The expressions of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), vascular endothelial growth factor, cyclin D1, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen were investigated immunohistochemically in biopsy specimens obtained before treatment from all 62 patients. The immunoreactivities were compared with responsiveness to CRT, as evaluated by endoscopy.

Results: The complete response rate of the primary tumor estimated by endoscopy was 62% (13/21) in patients in the EGFR-positive group. The difference in the CR rate between EGFR-positive and -negative groups was significant (p = 0.037). The immunoreactivities of the other molecular markers did not show a significant correlation with the responsiveness of the primary lesion to CRT. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that positive immunostaining for EGFR was significantly correlated with primary CR for CRT in esophageal SCC.

Conclusion: Among 62 patients with esophageal SCC, differences in the responsiveness of primary lesions to CRT were correlated with EGFR immunoreactivity assessed in the biopsy specimens. These results suggest that EGFR may help to predict the response of primary sites to definitive CRT in esophageal SCC, although the results should be confirmed in a larger, more homogeneous series.

Key Words: esophageal cancer • chemoradiotherapy • epidermal growth factor receptor


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GutHome page
K R Fareed, P Kaye, I N Soomro, M Ilyas, S Martin, S L Parsons, and S Madhusudan
Biomarkers of response to therapy in oesophago-gastric cancer
Gut, January 1, 2009; 58(1): 127 - 143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.