Skip Navigation

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 2008 38(6):414-418; doi:10.1093/jjco/hyn045
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ozawa, H.
Right arrow Articles by Fujii, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ozawa, H.
Right arrow Articles by Fujii, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author (2008). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved

Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Clinical Analysis of 43 Patients

Hiroyuki Ozawa1,2, Toshiki Tomita1, Koji Sakamoto1, Takamasa Tagawa1, Ryoichi Fujii1, Sho Kanzaki1, Kaoru Ogawa1, Kaori Kameyama3 and Masato Fujii4

1 Department of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine Keio University, Tokyo
2 Department of Otolaryngology, Shizuoka Red Cross Hospital, Shizuoka
3 Department of Pathology, School of Medicine Keio University
4 Department of Otolaryngology, National Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan

For reprints and all correspondence: Hiroyuki Ozawa, Department of Otolaryngology, Shizuoka Red Cross Hospital, 8-2 Outemachi, Aoi-ku, Shizuoka City 420-0853, Japan. E-mail: ozakky{at}cb.mbn.or.jp

Received March 23, 2008; accepted May 15, 2008

Objective: It is well known that mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) displays a variety of biological behaviors. While the high-grade type is a highly aggressive tumor, its low-grade counterpart usually demonstrates a more benign nature and several systems have, therefore, been proposed to grade this neoplasm.

Methods: This report analyzes 43 patients suffering from head and neck MEC, who were treated in our department during the period from 1989 to 2005. The relationship between clinical and pathologic characteristics and survival rate was investigated.

Results: The 5-year overall and disease-free survival rate was 62.3 and 57.2%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the parameters that significantly affected survival were the patient’s age (P = 0.040) and treatment method (P = 0.011).

Conclusions: The patient’s age and treatment method is the prognostic parameter in this study. Although complete surgical resection is the standard treatment for MEC, we should aggressively consider adjunctive radiotherapy in those cases that have a high risk of recurrence and poor prognosis.

Key Words: mucoepidermoid carcinoma • head and neck cancer • salivary gland • prognosis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.