Skip Navigation



Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology Advance Access published online on June 23, 2007

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, doi:10.1093/jjco/hym048
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
37/6/419    most recent
hym048v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsuchiya, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tsugane, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tsuchiya, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tsugane, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2007 Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research

Breast Cancer in First-degree Relatives and Risk of Lung Cancer: Assessment of the Existence of Gene–Sex Interactions

Masaki Tsuchiya1, Motoki Iwasaki1,, Tetsuya Otani1, Jun-ichi Nitadori1, Koichi Goto2, Yutaka Nishiwaki2, Yosuke Uchitomi3 and Shoichiro Tsugane1

1 Epidemiology and Prevention Division, Research Center for Cancer Prevention and Screening, National Cancer Center, Tokyo
2 Thoracic Oncology Division, Research Center for Innovative Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East
3 Psycho-Oncology Division, Research Center for Innovative Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan

For reprints and all correspondence: Motoki Iwasaki, Epidemiology and Prevention Division, Research Center for Cancer Prevention and Screening, National Cancer Center, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. E-mail: moiwasak{at}gan2.res.ncc.go.jp

Received November 22, 2006; accepted January 29, 2007

Background: Previous studies have shown the sex differences in lung cancer and the associations between estrogen-related genes and non-small cell lung cancer. In the present study, we assumed the existence of shared candidate genes that are common in lung and breast cancers, and examined whether women with a family history of breast cancer are at increased risk of lung cancer compared with men, especially adenocarcinoma, in a case-only study.

Methods: This case-only study was conducted based on the Lung Cancer Database Project at the National Cancer Center Hospital East. A total of 1566 patients with newly diagnosed primary lung cancer were consecutively recruited between 1999 and 2003. Information on their family history of cancer and smoking habit was obtained from a self-administered questionnaire. To assess an interactions between two factors, odds ratios for interaction (ORis) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by case-only contingency table.

Results: A statistically significant ORi was observed between a family history of breast cancer in first-degree relatives (parent and siblings, not including children) and the sex of a patient (ORi: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.02–4.81). A stratified analysis by histologic subtypes showed a statistically significant ORi only for adenocarcinoma (ORi: 3.27, 95% CI: 1.19–8.98). No other family history of cancer, such as stomach, colon and lung cancer, showed a statistically significant ORi.

Conclusion: This study suggests the possibility of gene–sex interaction in lung cancer.

Key Words: lung cancer • breast cancer • shared candidate genes • gene • sex interaction


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.