Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Natsume, O.
Right arrow Articles by Ohta, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Natsume, O.
Right arrow Articles by Ohta, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology Pages 107-110


Bellini Duct Carcinoma: a Case Report
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
Acknowledgement
References

Bellini Duct Carcinoma: a Case Report

Bellini Duct Carcinoma: a Case Report Osamu Natsume1, Seiichiro Ozono2, Takashi Futami2 and Masahiko Ohta2

1Department of Urology, Nara National Hospital, Nara and 2Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan

We report a rare case of Bellini duct carcinoma, which is an unusual variant of renal cell carcinoma. The patient, a 56-year-old man, was admitted to our hospital for detailed examination of a renal mass on the left side. He had no clinical symptoms such as gross hematuria or flank pain. Abdominal ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a tumor 4 cm in diameter at the lower pole of the left kidney. Selective renal angiography showed an avascular mass lesion. We performed left transperitoneal radical nephrectomy with a preoperative diagnosis of left renal tumor, T2N0M0. The histopathological diagnosis was Bellini duct carcinoma of papillary tubular type. Lectin histochemistry demonstrated positive staining with soyabean agglutinin and peanut agglutinin. These findings supported our conclusion that the tumor might have originated from the Bellini duct epithelium. The patient currently remains disease-free. The pathogenesis and management of this rare condition are discussed.

Key words: Bellini duct carcinoma - renal cell adenocarcinoma - lectin histochemistry

INTRODUCTION

Renal cell carcinomas are usually recognized as epithelial cell tumors originating from the proximal tubules. However, recently developed techniques of lectin histochemistry have revealed an unusual variant of renal cell carcinoma, thought to originate from the collecting ducts of Bellini, as a new entity within the spectrum of renal cell carcinoma. As this Bellini duct carcinoma (BDC) sometimes has a progressive clinical course, analysis of its character and establishment of treatment modalities for this malignancy are essential. Here we present a rare case of BDC supported by the results of lectin histochemistry studies.

CASE REPORT

A 56-year-old man was referred to our hospital in November 1994 for detailed examination of a left renal mass, which had been pointed out by a local physician who was treating the patient for acute myocardial infarction. The patient had no symptoms suggestive of urological diseases such as gross hematuria or flank pain. Laboratory examinations including urinary cytological examination revealed no abnormalities except for modest elevation of carcinoembryonic antigen and C-reactive protein levels. The results of intravenous pyelography were normal, but abdominal ultrasonography and dynamic CT demonstrated a solid mass 4 cm in diameter, which was not enhanced by contrast medium. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a solid mass expanding from the renal medulla through the cortex at the lower pole of the left kidney. Selective renal angiography showed an avascular mass lesion. Systemic evaluation including chest CT and bone scintigraphy revealed no metastasis. The patient underwent transperitoneal radical nephrectomy on the left side with a preoperative diagnosis of renal tumor, T2N0M0. The resected kidney weighed 406 g and macroscopically showed a reddish-brown tumor 43 mm in diameter with partial necrosis surrounded by a thin fibrous capsule (Fig. 1). Microscopic examination revealed a prominent papillary structure, low-grade adenocarcinoma with cuboidal cells, eosinophilic cytoplasm and a hobnail appearance. The cells were similar to the collecting duct epithelium. The histopathological diagnosis was papillary-type BDC (Fig. 2). Lectin histochemistry using paraffin-embedded sections revealed positivity with soyabean agglutinin (SBA), peanut agglutinin (PNA) and wheatgerm agglutinin (WGA) (Fig. 3), suggesting that the tumor might have originated from the distal tubules or collecting ducts of Bellini. The postoperative clinical course was good, and the patient is currently alive and disease-free, 14 months after surgery.


Figure 1. Macroscopic appearance of the resected kidney. A reddish-brown tumor 43 mm in diameter with partial necrosis is located at the lower pole of the kidney (arrow).

DISCUSSION

Bellini duct tumor is an unusual variant of renal cell carcinoma which has received some attention in the recent literature. The first report to indicate that the Bellini duct epithelium could give rise to tumors was that made by Mancilla-Jimenz (1), based on findings of atypical hyperplastic change in the collecting duct distant from a renal papillary tumor. Since Cromie (2) defined this rare disease, other investigators have subsequently considered its origin as being the collecting duct epithelium of Bellini. Fleming and Lewi (3) defined the diagnostic criteria and established collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney as a separate histological entity arising in the renal medulla. In the international classification of tumors by the World Health Organization (4), it has been grouped with renal cell carcinoma with the sub-designation `Bellini duct carcinoma'.

Previous reports have suggested that this tumor originates from the collecting duct epithelium, based on its location in the renal medulla, the histopathological features of the tumor cells and an architecture similar to that of the distal collecting tubules. Thoenes et al. (5) also reported a review of the cytomorphological typing of renal cell carcinomas in relation to the different parts and cell types of the nephron and collecting duct. BDC was divided into two histological types (6,7). The papillary type was grayish-white in color with a yellow tinge, and microscopically the tumor cells demonstrated an eosinophilic cytoplasm, nuclear polymorphism, distinct nucleoli with a papillary or tubulopapillary structure and a resemblance to the distal collecting duct epithelium (6-9). Therefore, if the tumor were small, it would be located in the renal medulla only as a nodular mass (8). On the other hand, the mixed type was grayish-white in color macroscopically, with microscopic features of tubulopapillary adenocarcinoma and areas of transitional cell differentiation (3,6,7,10). The tumor cells showed a ring-shaped arrangement mimicking the mesonephric duct.

Recently, histochemistry using lectins such as PNA, SBA and Dolichos biflorus agglutinin (DBA), and antibodies against cytokeratin (CK) and vimentin reactive with several portions of the normal renal tubule, several investigators have achieved differential diagnosis from common papillary renal cell carcinoma in a majority of cases. The binding sites for PNA and SBA which we employed in this study are located predominantly in the distal portion of the tubule, whereas those for WGA are located in all tubule segments (11). Our results with lectin histochemistry confirmed those of Fleming and Symes (12), Aizawa et al. (5), Kikuchi (13) and Kennedy et al. (14), who demonstrated positive staining with PNA, SBA, CK and/or DBA in tumors identified as BDC.


Figure 2. (a) Histological findings of BDC containing papillary fronds. (b) High- power view of BDC showing papillary fronds lined by cuboidal cells with large pleomorphic nuclei and eosinophilic cytoplasm. A hobnail appearance is evident.


Figure 3. Lectin histochemistry using (a) soyabean agglutinin, (b) peanut agglutinin, (c) wheatgerm agglutinin. All show a strongly positive reaction.

With regard to the incidence of BDC, Rumpelt et al. (15) found six BDCs (0.4%) among 1400 consecutive renal cell carcinomas. To our knowledge, there have been detailed clinical reports on 38 cases of BDC in Japan including the present case. While patients of all ages may be affected, most BDCs have occurred in young individuals, and there is a male predominance. Most cases reported previously (15,16) had a tendency for early dissemination and a fatal clinical course, as can be seen in Table 1. Of the 38 cases, the average age of the patients was 55 years (range 37-76), and the male:female ratio was 4.4:1. There was no predominant laterality of the affected side, 17 cases affecting the right kidney and 21 the left. The surgical method was nephrectomy in 28 cases, partial nephrectomy in two and nephroureterectomy in eight. Of the 29 cases for which the clinical outcome was reported, 14 (48%) of the patients died due directly to the tumor or its metastases. The site of metastasis was the lung in eight cases, lymph nodes in seven, bone in six, liver in five and skin in one. Nomura et al. (17) reported a patient with BDC who died from multiple metastatic lung lesions with rapid dissemination 4 months after resection of the tumor, which was classified histologically as mixed type. As can be seen in Table 1, although eight patients were treated with various combinations of chemotherapeutic agents, the outcome was fatal in five and progressive in two, with one exception presenting no further evidence of disease. Immunoactive agents such as interferon or interleukin, and combination chemotherapy for relapsed desease or metastatic lesions, usually seem to be ineffective (15,18).

Table 1 Clinical features of 38 cases of BDC in the Japanese literature.
Clinical feature No. Survival period (months)
Sex
Male 31  
Female 7  
Laterality
Right 17  
Left 21  
Metastatic site (15 cases)
Lung 8  
Lymph nodes 7  
Bone 6  
Liver 5  
Skin 1  
Surgery (38 cases)
Nephrectomy 28  
Partial nephrectomy 2  
Nephroureterectomy 8  
Adjuvant therapy
IFN 5  
Chemotherapy 3  
Chemotherapy + IFN 4  
Chemotherapy + Others 1  
Radiation + IFN 1  
Clinical outcome
NED 15 3-40
AWD 5 2-25
CD 9 3-20
Unknown 9  
Mean patient age 55 years (range 35-76); mean tumor size 5.0 cm (range 1.0-15). IFN, interferon; NED, no evidence of disease; AWD, alive with disease; CD, cancer death.

In conclusion, BDC is a rare tumor with a clinically rapid and progressively malignant course. This makes it important to determine the origin of all renal tumors and to distinguish rare forms such as BDC from common types of renal cell carcinoma. Moreover, it is highly desirable that a modality of treatment be established for this malignancy. Detailed, long-term follow-up to detect local recurrence or distant metastasis is, of course, also necessary.

Acknowledgement

We thank Professor Eigoro Okajima, Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, for his critical review of the manuscript.

References

1. Mancilla-Jimenez R, Stanley RJ, Blath RA. Papillary renal cell carcinoma. A clinical, radiologic, and pathologic study of 34 cases. Cancer 1976;38:2469-80. MEDLINE Abstract

2. Cromie WJ, Davis CJ, DeTure FA. Atypical carcinoma of kidney, possibly originating from collecting duct epithelium. Urology 1979;13:315-7. MEDLINE Abstract

3. Fleming S, Lewi HJE. Collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney. Histopathology 1986;10:1131-41. MEDLINE Abstract

4. Mostofi FK, Sesterhenn IA, Sobin LH. Histological typing of kidney tumours. In: International histologic classification of tumors, No. 25. Geneva, WHO 1981

5. Thoenes W, Störkel S, Rumpelt HJ. Moll R. Cytomorphological typing of renal cell carcinoma - a new approach. Eur Urol 1990;18:6-9. MEDLINE Abstract

6. Aizawa Sh, Kikuchi Y, Suzuki M, Furusato M. Renal cell carcinoma of lower nephron origin. Acta Pathol Jpn 1987;37:567-74.

7. Gohji K, Minayoshi K, Higuchi A, Fujii A, Gotoh A. A case of papillary renal cell carcinoma suggestive of Bellini duct origin. Acta Urol Jpn 1994;40:329-32.

8. O'Brien PK, Bedard YC. A papillary adenocarcinoma of the renal pelvis in a young girl. A light- and electron-microscopic study. Am J Clin Pathol 1980;73:427-33. MEDLINE Abstract

9. Lack EE, Cassady JR, Sallan SE. Renal cell carcinoma in childhood and adolescence. A clinical and pathological study of 17 cases. J Urol 1985;133:822-8. MEDLINE Abstract

10. Hai MA, Diaz-Perez R. Atypical carcinoma of kidney originating from collecting duct epithelium. Urology 1982;14:89-92.

11. Fleming S, Symes CE. The distribution of cytokeratin antigens in the kidney and in renal tumours. Histopathology 1987;11:157-70. MEDLINE Abstract

12. Kikuchi Y. Lectin and immunohistochemical studies on acquired cystic kidney and associated renal cell carcinoma. Acta Pathol Jpn 1989;39:373-80. MEDLINE Abstract

13. Kennedy SM, Merino MJ, Linehan WM, Roberts JR, Robertson CN, Neumann RD. Collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney. Hum Pathol 1990;21:449-56. MEDLINE Abstract

14. Rumpelt HJ, Störkel S, Moll R, Schärfe T, Thoenes W. Bellini duct carcinoma:further evidence for this rare variant of renal cell carcinoma. Histopathology 1991;18:115-22. MEDLINE Abstract

15. Dimopoulos MA, Logothetis CJ, Markowitz A, Sella A, Amato R, Ro J. Collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney. Br J Urol 1993;71:388-91. MEDLINE Abstract

16. Nomura M, Nagaoka A, Ueno Y, Mitsuno S, Sugita A, Haratake J et al. Bellini duct carcinoma: a case report. Nishinihon Hinyokika 1994;56:1078-81 (in Japanese).

17. Carter MD, Tha S, McLoughlin MG, Owen DA. Collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney: a case report and review of the literature. J Urol 1992;147:1096-8. MEDLINE Abstract

18. Sekido N, Hinotsu S, Kawai K, Matsuki K, Akaza H, Koiso K. Bellini duct carcinoma accompanied by hemorrhagic renal cyst: a case report and review of the literature. Nishinihon Hinyokika 1995;57:515-8 (in Japanese).


Received July 29, 1996; accepted October 14, 1996
For reprints and all correspondence:Seiichiro Ozono, Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Shijo-cho 840, Kashihara, Nara 634, Japan
Abbreviations: BDC, Bellini duct carcinoma; SBA, soyabean agglutinin; PNA, peanut agglutinin; WGA, wheatgerm agglutinin; DBA, Dolichos biflorus agglutinin; CK, cytokeratin.


This page is run by Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, as part of the OUP Journals
Comments and feedback: www-admin{at}oup.co.uk
Last modification: 19 May 1998
Copyright© Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1997.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Natsume, O.
Right arrow Articles by Ohta, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Natsume, O.
Right arrow Articles by Ohta, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?