| Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology | Pages |
Introduction
Patients And Methods
Patients
Drug Formulation
Study Design
Response
Pharmacokinetic Study
Statistical Analysis
Results
Patient Accrual and Monitoring Committee
Hematologic Toxicity
Non-hematologic Toxicity
Response
Pharmacokinetics
Discussion
Acknowledgements
References
Phase I Study of Cladribine (2-Chlorodeoxyadenosine) in Lymphoid Malignancies
INTRODUCTION
Cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine, 2-CdA) is a chlorinated purine analogue that is resistant to degradation by adenosine deaminase. Phosphorylated derivatives of 2-CdA accumulate in lymphocytes with high deoxycytidine kinase activity, resulting in DNA strand breaks and cell death. Since the cytotoxic properties of 2-CdA are independent of cell division, 2-CdA is expected to be an effective agent in the treatment of indolent lymphoid malignancy with low-growth fraction. The agent was synthesized and has been investigated extensively by researchers at the Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation in the United States (1-3). Several clinical trials conducted in the United States and European countries have shown the clinical activity of 2-CdA against B-cell malignancies such as hairy cell leukemia (HCL) (4-7), B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) (8-10), B-prolymphocytic leukemia (B-PLL) (11) and indolent B-lymphoma (12-14).
It is known that deoxycytidine kinase is rich in T-lymphocytes, and an in vitro study showed the sensitivity of T-lymphoblastoid cell lines to 2-CdA (15). In addition, 2-CdA has been reported to be effective against cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) (16-18). Therefore, 2-CdA could be effective in the treatment of adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma (ATL), which is a T-cell malignancy with an extremely poor prognosis. With the aim of establishing an effective new treatment against ATL and other resistant lymphoid malignancies, we initiated a clinical trial of 2-CdA in Japan. The primary purpose of this phase I study was to determine the feasibility of the recommended phase II dose of 2-CdA (0.09 mg/kg/day by seven-day continuous i.v. infusion) for Japanese patients; this dose has been established in Caucasian patients. Another purpose was to evaluate the efficacy of 2-CdA against relapsed or refractory lymphoid malignancies.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients
Previously treated patients with lymphoid malignancies were eligible if they met the following criteria: 1, histologic and/or cytologic confirmation of lymphoid malignancies such as non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), ATL, CTCL, Hodgkin's disease (HD), CLL, PLL and HCL; 2, patients with refractory lymphoid malignancy against standard chemotherapy, those relapsed after attaining complete remission (CR), or those who showed disease progression after attaining partial remission (PR); 3, no chemotherapy or irradiation within two weeks prior to the study; 4, life expectancy of at least eight weeks; 5, >= 15 years and <75 years of age; 6, performance status 2 or better on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Scale; 7, adequate bone marrow function (neutrophil count >= 1500/[mu]l, platelet count >= 100 000/[mu]l, hemoglobin >= 8.0 g/dl), adequate hepatic function (bilirubin <2.0 times the upper limit of normal, transaminases <2.5 times the upper limits of normal), adequate renal function (creatinine <1.5 times the upper limit of normal), adequate pulmonary function (PaO2 >= 65 mmHg) and normal electrocardiogram; 8, no severe complications; and 9, written informed consent given. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of each institution.
In total, ten patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoid malignancies were enrolled in the study between May and October 1995. Their clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1.
One patient (Case 4) was judged to be ineligible for this study after receiving 2-CdA, because she had received radiation alone (no chemotherapy). All ten patients treated were evaluable for toxicity. Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated in nine eligible patients and in all ten patients treated. The median age was 64 years, and the male:female ratio was 6:4. According to the Working Formulation (19) and the Revised European-American Lymphoma Classification (REAL Classification) (20), one patient had follicular small cleaved-cell lymphoma, three had follicular mixed cell lymphoma, two had mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), one had CLL of B-cell type (B-CLL), one had ATL, and two had CTCL. The number of prior chemotherapeutic regimens was zero in one patient, 1 in six, 2 in two and 6 in one case.
Drug Formulation
2-CdA was supplied by Janssen-Kyowa Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan as a 0.1% (1 mg/ml) solution of endotoxin-free 2-CdA in sterile 0.9% sodium chloride. The desired dosage of 2-CdA was added to preservative-free normal saline to make a total volume of 500 to 1000 ml, and infused through central or peripheral venous access.
Table 1.
| Case no. | Age/sex |
PS |
Disease (immunophenotype) |
Prior therapy (response) [no. of prior chemotherapeutic regimens] |
Disease status
|
| 1 | 65/M | 0 | FM (B) | C-MOPP (PR); [1] | progressed after PR |
| 2 | 58/F | 0 | FM (B) | SM5887+COP (NE); CHOP (CR); [2] | relapsed after CR |
| 3 | 73/M | 0 | FM (B) | VDS+CPM+PSL (PR); VEPA (PR); LSG4 (CR); VDS+CPM+PCZ+PSL (PR); Radiation (CR); VDS+CPM+MTX+PSL (PR); VP-16 (NC); [6] |
refractory after relapse |
| *4 | 71/F | 0 | CTCL (T) | Radiation (CR); [0] | relapsed after CR |
| 5 | 73/M | 2 | ATL (T) | Sobuzoxan (NC); [1] | primary refractory |
| 6 | 63/F | 0 | MCL (B) | C-MOPP (CR); [1] | relapsed after CR |
| 7 | 45/M | 0 | FSC (B) | LSG9 (PR); [1] | progressed after PR |
| 8 | 63/M | 0 | MCL (B) | mLSG4 (CR); [1] | relapsed after CR |
| 9 | 68/F | 0 | CLL (B) | VP-16 (NC); [1] | primary refractory |
| 10 | 62/M | 0 | CTCL (T) | IFN-[gamma] (NC); CHOP (NC); [2] | primary refractory |
Table 2
| Level | Cladribine (mg/kg/day) |
| 1 | 0.06 |
| 2 | 0.09 |
| 3 | 0.12 |
| 4 | 0.15 |
Study Design
We administered 2-CdA with a schedule of seven-day continuous i.v. infusion every 28 days up to a maximum of three cycles. The dose-escalation schema of 2-CdA is shown in Table 2. Based on the results of the previously-reported clinical trials in Western countries (4,7,9,10,12-14,16,18,21,22) the starting dose of 2-CdA was 0.06 mg/kg/day (Level 1), and dose escalations of 0.03 mg/kg/day increments were planned up to 0.15 mg/kg/day (Level 4). Intrapatient dose escalation was not allowed.
The treatment was repeated every 28 days, unless patients developed progressive disease or critical toxicities. In this study the critical toxicities were defined as grade 4 hematologic toxicity and/or non-hematologic toxicity of grade 3 or more, according to the toxicity grading criteria of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) (23), which is an expanded version of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria.
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was planned for daily administration when neutrophil counts decreased to <1000/[mu]l. Three patients were scheduled for entry at each dose level. If each of the above-mentioned critical toxicities was observed in one of the three patients, an additional three patients were scheduled for treatment at the same dose level. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as the dose level at which critical toxicities were observed in two or more of three to six patients.
Response
Tumor response was assessed according to the standard response criteria against each neoplastic disease; i.e., the World Health Organization criteria (24) for NHL, HD and CTCL, the response criteria for ATL by the Lymphoma Study Group of the JCOG (JCOG-LSG), the response criteria for CLL and PLL by the NCI-sponsored Working Group (25), and the standard response criteria against HCL (26). For NHL, HD and CTCL, CR was defined as the disappearance of all evidence of disease, clinically and with imaging studies, for at least four weeks. PR was defined as >50% decrease in the product of the perpendicular diameters of the indicator lesion(s) with no new lesion of malignancy for at least four weeks. All other categories of tumor response were defined as no changes (NC).
Pharmacokinetic Study
Blood was sampled in heparinized tubes just before initiating the infusion of 2-CdA (0 hour), and at 23, 47, 71, and 143 hours during continuous i.v. infusion. At the end of the seven-day continuous i.v. infusion and 2, 4, 6, 9, 24 and 48 hours later, venous blood samples were taken in heparinized tubes and centrifuged, and the plasma was stored at -20oC until analysis. The concentration of 2-CdA in plasma was determined by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) with 0.1 ng/ml as the low quantitation limit. The analytical procedure is shown in Fig. 1. The area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) was calculated according to the trapezoid rule from time zero to the last measurable concentration, and extrapolated to time infinity. The t1/2 of 2-CdA in plasma was calculated using log-linear regression of the points considered to be in the terminal phase.
Table 3
| Case no. | No. of administered |
Grades of hematologic toxicities |
Non-hematologic | Response | courses | WBC | Neu | Plt | Hb |
| Level 1 (0.06 mg/kg/day) | |||||||
| 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | none | NC |
| 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | nausea/vomiting (1) | NC |
| 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | dermatitis (1), herpes zoster (1), fever (2) | NC |
| Level 2 (0.09 mg/kg/day) | |||||||
| *4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | hypoxemia (4), fever (2), vascular pain (2), infection (1) | CR |
| 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | none | PR |
| 6 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | none | PR |
| 7 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | nausea/vomiting (1) | PD |
| 8 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | none | NC |
| 9 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | dermatitis (1), tachycardia (1) | PR |
| 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | none | NC |
Statistical Analysis
Comparisons of pharmacokinetic parameters between the dose levels were analyzed by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, using SAS, Release 6.08.
RESULTS
Patient Accrual and Monitoring Committee
Between May 15 and June 28, 1995, three patients were enrolled at Level 1 (0.06 mg/kg/day). As shown in Table 3 (Cases 1 to 3), no patient developed critical toxicities. According to the dose- escalation schema of the protocol, three patients were enrolled at Level 2 in August, 1995. When we reviewed the clinical data of these six cases, we found that Case 4 (CTCL) was ineligible because she had not previously received chemotherapy (only radiation).
Immediately after the first course of 2-CdA was finished in all six patients, a monitoring committee was convened on September 18, 1995. At that point, no critical toxicities had occurred among the six patients. The three members (T.N., H.M. and M.S.) of the monitoring committee reviewed the clinical data. They recommended that an additional four patients should be treated at Level 2, and that the dose of 2-CdA should not be escalated further, based on the data of the present study and recent publications (13,21,22) from the United States regarding 2-CdA. In particular, taking the warning about the neurotoxicity of purine analogues by Cheson and colleagues at the NCI (22) into consideration, we stopped any further dose escalation to avoid the occurrence of severe or irreversible neurotoxicity. According to the recommendations by the monitoring committee, an additional four patients were enrolled at Level 2.
Hematologic Toxicity
The toxicity profiles and antitumor responses of all ten patients are shown in Table 3. Of the three patients who were treated at Level 1 (0.06 mg/kg/day), one patient developed grade 3 leukopenia and grade 3 neutropenia, and the remaining two developed grade 2 leukopenia and grade 2 neutropenia.
Of the seven patients treated at Level 2 (0.09 mg/kg/day), one patient with CTCL (Case 4) developed grade 4 thrombocytopenia (24 000/[mu]l) on day 44 of the third course. One patient with B-CLL (Case 9) developed grade 4 neutropenia on day 36 of the first course. Other hematologic toxicities encountered at Level 2 were of grade 3 or less. In total, two of the seven patients treated at Level 2 developed grade 4 hematologic toxicities.
Non-hematologic Toxicity
One patient with CTCL (Case 4), who was treated at Level 2, developed grade 4 hypoxemia (PaO2 48.1 mmHg). She was diagnosed as suffering from interstitial pneumonitis based on clinical symptoms such as hypoxemia and non-productive cough and on chest X-ray findings. When a diagnosis of interstitial pneumonitis was made on day 7 of the third course, the administration of 2-CdA was immediately discontinued. She recovered from the interstitial pneumonitis following treatment with high dose glucocorticoid, immunoglobulin products and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim.
Other non-hematologic toxicities were of grade 2 or less, such as grade 2 fever in two patients, grade 2 vascular pain in one, and grade 1 dermatitis in two. The infectious complications encountered in all ten patients treated were grade 1 herpes zoster and grade 1 infection only. In five patients, non-hematologic toxicities were not observed. No neurotoxicity was encountered in any patient.
Response
In the three patients treated at Level 1, two showed >50% reduction in superficial lymph nodes. However, no apparent reduction of abdominal lymph nodes was documented by computer tomography. The antitumor response to 2-CdA in these three patients was assessed as NC.
In the seven patients treated at Level 2, one patient with CTCL (Case 4) attained CR by three courses of 2-CdA. One of the two patients with mantle cell lymphoma attained PR by three courses. One patient with B-CLL attained PR by a single course.
Table 4
| Case no. | T1/2 (hour) |
Cmax (nM) |
Css (nM) |
AUC (nM*h) |
| Level 1 (0.06 mg/kg/day) | ||||
| 1 | 22.1 | 20.4 | 17.1 | 2878.7 |
| 2 | 15.4 | 17.1 | 14.0 | 2318.5 |
| 3 | 30.1 | 18.1 | 16.6 | 2786.7 |
| mean +- SD (n = 3) | 22.5 +- 7.4 | 18.5 +- 1.7* | 15.9 +- 1.7[dagger] | 2661.3 +- 300.4[Dagger] |
| Level 2 (0.09 mg/kg/day) | ||||
| 5 | 32.2 | 14.8 | 13.7 | 2300.8 |
| 6 | 32.0 | 22.1 | 17.9 | 3001.3 |
| 7 | 22.1 | 26.0 | 22.1 | 3704.8 |
| 8 | 27.2 | 22.8 | 21.9 | 3679.0 |
| 9 | 21.2 | 20.3 | 16.8 | 2822.7 |
| 10 | 47.3 | 19.7 | 19.4 | 3260.2 |
| mean +- SD (n = 6) | 30.3 +- 9.5 | 21.0 +- 3.7 | 18.6 +- 3.2 | 3128.1 +- 538.0 |
| mean +- SD (n = 4)[sect] | 32.1 +- 10.9 | 22.7 +- 2.6* | 20.3 +- 2.0[dagger] | 3411.3 +- 341.0[Dagger] |
One patient with ATL of acute type (Case 5) achieved PR after three courses of 2-CdA. When he was entered into this phase I study, his leukocyte count was 196 900/[mu]l with 90% ATL cells. Approximately five months after the termination of the 2-CdA treatment, the ATL cells had completely disappeared from the peripheral blood. PR was maintained without subsequent therapy for approximately 10 weeks until the recurrence of lymphadenopathy.
In total, no response was obtained in the three patients who were treated at Level 1. In the seven patients treated at Level 2, four showed responses including one CR and three PR. Excluding Case 4, three of the six eligible patients who were treated at Level 2 achieved PR.
Pharmacokinetics
The pharmacokinetic data of nine patients who received 2-CdA are shown in Table 4. The data of Case 4 was not evaluable because of insufficient blood sampling.
References
This page is run by Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, as part of the OUP Journals
Comments and feedback: www-admin{at}oup.co.uk
Last modification: 19 May 1998
Copyright© Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1997.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Tobinai and T. Hotta Clinical Trials for Malignant Lymphoma in Japan Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2004; 34(7): 369 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Saito, Y. Kanda, M. Kami, K. Kato, N. Shoji, S. Kanai, T. Ohnishi, Y. Kawano, K. Nakai, T. Ogasawara, et al. Therapeutic Potential of a Reduced-Intensity Preparative Regimen for Allogeneic Transplantation with Cladribine, Busulfan, and Antithymocyte Globulin against Advanced/Refractory Acute Leukemia/Lymphoma Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2002; 8(4): 1014 - 1020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Schaner, J. Wang, L. Zhang, S.-F. Su, K. M. Gerstin, and K. M. Giacomini Functional Characterization of a Human Purine-Selective, Na+-Dependent Nucleoside Transporter (hSPNT1) in a Mammalian Expression System J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 1999; 289(3): 1487 - 1491. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||




