Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsuda, H
Right arrow Articles by Hirohashi, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tsuda, H
Right arrow Articles by Hirohashi, S
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology Pages 5-11


Prognostic Significance of Accumulation of Gene and Chromosome Alterations and Histological Grade in Node-negative Breast Carcinoma
Introduction
Patients And Methods
   Histological Typing and Grading of n0 Breast Cancer
   Follow-up Data
   Gene and Chromosome Alterations in n0 Breast Carcinomas
   Statistical Analysis
Results
Discussion
Acknowledgments
References

Prognostic Significance of Accumulation of Gene and Chromosome Alterations and Histological Grade in Node-negative Breast Carcinoma

Prognostic Significance of Accumulation of Gene and Chromosome Alterations and Histological Grade in Node-negative Breast Carcinoma Hitoshi Tsuda1, Chinami Sakamaki1, Shoichiro Tsugane2, Takashi Fukutomi3 and Setsuo Hirohashi1

1Pathology Division and 3Department of Surgery, National Cancer Center Research Institute and Hospital, Tokyo, and 2Epidemiology and Biostatistics Division, National Cancer Center Research Institute East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan

The histological grade of atypia is a known prognostic indicator for breast cancer patients and correlates with many gene and chromosome alterations. To investigate the independent prognostic significance of gene and chromosome alterations in axillary node-negative (n0) breast cancers of the invasive ductal and invasive lobular types, the prevalence of eight gene and chromosome alterations and their association with histological grade and recurrence was studied in 129 consecutive patients who had undergone resection over an average follow-up period of 43.4 months. Loss of heterozygosity on 16q, 17p, 16p, 17q and 18q, p53 gene mutation and c-erbB-2 and int-2 gene amplifications were detected in 55%, 37%, 25%, 24%, 22%, 23%, 15% and 11% respectively. Individual alterations in 17p, 17q, 18q, c-erbB-2 and p53 were detected most frequently and gene and chromosome alterations tended to be accumulated in Grade 3 n0 invasive ductal/lobular carcinomas. Histological grade, 18q, int-2 and the number of these gene and chromosome alterations were significant prognostic indicators on Cox's univariate proportional hazard model, and 18q and int-2 were still significant after adjustment for histological grade. Results suggested that examination of the presence of certain gene and chromosome alterations, as well as histological grade, were effective in identifying n0 breast cancer patients at high risk of early recurrence.

Key words: node-negative breast carcinoma - loss of heterozygosity - prognostic factors - gene mutations - gene amplifcation

INTRODUCTION

The 10-year disease-free survival rate in patients with node-metastasis-negative (n0) primary breast carcinomas after curative surgical therapy has been reported as 80-90% in Japanese and 60-70% in Caucasian patients (1-5). Identification of a high-risk n0 breast carcinoma group would be helpful because it would allow adjuvant therapies to be targeted on this group, thus potentially resulting in an improved prognosis. A number of histological, biochemical and immunohistochemical factors have been reported as being effective prognostic indicators in n0 breast carcinoma. Histological type, histological grade, nuclear grade and the number of mitotic figures of cancer cells are pure morphological prognostic indicators in the n0 group (5-10). Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), invasive ductal carcinoma with a predominantly intraductal component, or predominantly DCIS, medullary carcinoma and mucinous carcinoma have been shown to recur only rarely after curative surgery and are accepted as low-risk groups. In invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), the highest histological grade (Grade 3), is associated with a higher recurrence rate than lower grades (6-10). A case-control study revealed that patients with Grade 3 n0 IDC have a relative risk of early recurrence and death nearly 42 times higher than that of Grade 1 patients (11). If the evaluation of these histological parameters is performed objectively and reproducibly, histological type and grade would provide critical information with a strong impact on the prognosis. In addition to these histological parameters, tumor size on palpation, estrogen-receptor (ER) and progesterone-receptor (PgR) status, DNA aneuploidy, the S-phase fraction, expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor, nuclear immunoreaction of the p53 protein, microvessel density and loss of expression of the bcl-2 oncoprotein, which are detected by biochemical or immunohistochemical assays, are also known to have prognostic significance in n0 breast cancer (1-3,9-15). Nonetheless, the consensus is that there is no single factor which can accurately identify the high-risk n0 group and a combination of several factors must be used in practice to select patients likely to fall into this group (16).

Table 1. Criteria for histological grading in invasive ductal carcinoma and invasive lobular carcinoma
Atypia Score Criteria
I Structural atypia
1 Predominant papillary, tubular and/or cribriform pattern
2 Between 1 and 3
3 Predominantly solid nest pattern
II Nuclear atypia
1 Uniform nuclear size and shape. Chromatin does not appear coarse
2 Between 1 and 3
3 Pleomorphic nuclei. Chromatin has a coarse or fine granular appearance
III Number of mitotic figures
1 <5 per 10 high-power fields (* 400)
2 5-10 per 10 high-power fields
3 >10 per 10 high-power fields
Histological grade is the sum of scores for I, II and III: 3-4, Grade 1; 5-7, Grade 2; 8-9, Grade 3

There are strong correlations between the histological grade of atypia in breast carcinoma (comprising I, structural atypia; II, nuclear atypia; III, the number of mitotic figures), and the number of gene and chromosome alterations at the DNA level, e.g. amplifications of oncogenes, chromosome alterations such as loss of heterozygosity (LOH) on chromosomes 7q, 11p, 17p and 17q and point mutation of the p53 tumor-suppressor gene (17-21). These gene and chromosome alterations are most commonly detected in breast cancers with the highest histological grade, although certain chromosome alterations, e.g. LOH on 16q, are frequently detected in cancers regardless of their histological grade but do not occur in benign neoplasms of the breast.

To determine the prognostic significance of histological grade and gene and chromosome alterations in n0 breast cancers, we prospectively examined the incidence of eight gene and chromosome alterations and their association with histological grade and with cancer recurrence in 129 patients with IDC/invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). The prognostic significance of the number of gene and chromosome alterations was also analyzed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Histological Typing and Grading of n0 Breast Cancer

Fresh breast cancer and non-cancerous tissue specimens were obtained from 167 Japanese patients with n0 breast carcinoma who underwent curative surgery at the hospital between June 1990 and December 1992. Except for one patient who underwent quadrantectomy and lymph node dissection with radiation therapy, in whom the surgical margins were free of cancer, radical mastectomies were performed on all patients. We confirmed that the tumor tissue specimens contained >50% of the cancer cell area by histological observation of the tissue sections adjacent to the specimens.

Histological typing of the primary tumor was performed according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria (22). Thirty-two patients were found to have DCIS or predominantly DCIS, 125 IDC, four ILC, three mucinous carcinoma, two medullary carcinoma and one tubular carcinoma. The criteria for histological grading of IDC were based on a modification of those recommended by the WHO (Table 1) (23). These criteria were also applied to ILC, in which the score for structural atypia was always three. This grade was also allocated to the invasive components in carcinoma with an invasive component. When there was heterogeneity in the grade within a tumor specimen, the higher grade was adopted if the region with the higher grade comprised >= 10% of the primary tumor area while the lower grade was assigned if the area with the higher grade comprised <10% of the specimen. Twenty IDC specimens were classified as Grade 1, 46 as Grade 2 and 59 as Grade 3. One ILC was classified as Grade 2 and three as Grade 3.

Follow-up Data

Thirty-eight patients with low-risk histological types, i.e., DCIS or predominantly DCIS, mucinous carcinoma, medullary carcinoma or tubular carcinoma were excluded from the analysis, since only one patient with a predominantly DCIS type tumor suffered a lung metastasis 44 mo after surgery. In these 38 patients, the mean follow-up period after surgery was 42.6 mo. We examined the association between gene and chromosome alterations and prognosis in the remaining 129 patients with n0 IDC/ILC. These patients, aged from 29 to 83, comprised 60 pre/perimenopausal and 69 postmenopausal patients; 40 with tumors <= 2.0 cm in diameter, 81 with 2.1-5.0 cm diameter tumors and eight with tumors >= 5.1 cm in diameter on palpation; 95 positive for ER (>10 fmol/mg protein), 22 negative for ER ( <= 10 fmol/mg protein) and 12 with no data regarding ER status; 81 positive for PgR (>10 fmol/mg protein), 36 negative for PgR ( <= 10 fmol/mg protein) and 12 with no PgR status data. No patient received perioperative adjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy. Among the 129 IDC/ILC patients, 20 (18 with IDC and two with ILC) suffered a recurrence within 49 months of surgery and six died from disseminated cancer. In the remaining 123 patients, the mean follow-up period was 43.4 months after surgery, ranging from 15 to 61 months.

Gene and Chromosome Alterations in n0 Breast Carcinomas

LOH on 16p, LOH on 16q and mutation of the p53 gene had already been examined in 65, 65 and 37 patients respectively (21,24). DNA was isolated from cancerous and non-cancerous tissue specimens of 64 other carcinomas. Five µg of DNA isolated from each of the 129 carcinomas was digested with RsaI, TaqI (New England BioLab, Beverly, MA), BamHI or MspI (Takara, Kyoto, Japan), electrophoresed in 0.8% agarose gel, denatured in alkali, neutralized and blotted onto Nitroplus filters (MSI, Westboro, MA) (21). The filters were prehybridized then hybridized to the polymorphic genomic DNA markers or proto-oncogene cDNA probes. The probes used were D16S83 (pEKMDA2.1A, RsaI), HBA (JW101, RsaI) and D16S159 (CJ52.94, TaqI) for 16p (25,26); D16S4 (ACH207, TaqI), HP (hp2[alpha], BamHI), TAT (BB0.4, BamHI), D16S7 (79-2-23, TaqI, RsaI), and APRT (pAT2.3aprt, TaqI) for 16q (26); D17S34 (p144D6, TaqI), D17S30 (pYNZ22, TaqI, RsaI), D17S31 (pMCT35.1, MspI), D17S1 (pHF12-2, MspI), MYH2 (p10-5, MspI) and D17S71 (pA10-41, MspI) for 17p (27-29); D17S74 (pCMM86, TaqI, RsaI) for 17q (29); and D18S8 (OLVII E10, MspI), D18S7 (OLVII A8, MspI) and D18S5 (OS4, TaqI) for 18q (30-32). Gene amplification was examined using the c-erbB-2 (pCER204) and int-2 (SS6) probes (33,34). Mutations in exons 4-8 of the p53 gene were examined by polymerase chain reaction single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis (35).

The mean number of gene and chromosome alterations per tumor was modulated by the formula:
where N1 is the number of alterations, including LOH on 16p, 17p, 17q and 18q, c-erbB-2 and int-2 gene amplifications, and p53 gene mutations, in each tumor, and N2 is the number of gene or chromosome loci informative for gene alterations in each tumor. In this formula, n, the number of gene alteration types examined, was always 7. Because LOH on 16q occurs in breast cancer regardless of the grade of atypia (21), this alteration was excluded from the calculation.

Statistical Analysis

The correlation of each gene or chromosome alteration with the histological grade was examined using the [chi]2 test. Disease-free survival curves were plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method and differences between the three curves were investigated by the log-rank test (36,37). The risk estimation of each prognostic indicator by univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by Cox's proportional hazards general linear model using the PHREG procedure of the SAS program package (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) (38).

RESULTS

The 20 IDC/ILC patients with recurrence comprised 17 with Grade 3 tumors (15 IDC and two ILC) and three with Grade 2 IDC. No patient with a Grade 1 tumor experienced recurrence. Disease-free survival curves differed significantly between the Grade 1, Grade 2 and Grade 3 groups (P = 0.004, Fig. 1). Tumor size, menopausal status, ER and PgR did not influence disease-free survival in n0 IDC/ILC.


Figure 1. Correlation of histological grade with early recurrence of n0 IDC/ILCs. Disease-free survival curves for patients with: a, Grade 1 (n = 20); b, Grade 2 (n = 47); c, Grade 3 (n = 62) tumors. There were significant differences between the curves for the three Grades (p = 0.004).

LOH on 16p, 16q, 17p, 17q and 18q, p53 mutation, amplification of the c-erbB-2 gene and amplification of the int-2 gene were detected in 25% (29/116), 55% (71/129), 37% (47/128), 24% (30/124), 22% (26/118), 23% (30/129), 15% (19/129) and 11% (14/129) respectively. The prevalence of alterations of 17p, 17q, 18q, p53 and c-erbB-2 was significantly higher in the higher histological grade group (Table 2). LOH on 16p and amplification of the int-2 gene tended to be more frequent in the Grade 3 group.

Table 2. Incidence of gene and chromosome alterations in n0 breast carcinomas by histological grade
Gene alterations No. of specimens with gene alterations
/No. of specimens informative (%)
Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3
LOH on 16p 4/20 (20) 9/43 (21) 16/54 (30)
LOH on 16q 10/20 (50) 25/47 (53) 36/62 (58)
LOH on 17p 2/20 (10) 10/46 (22) 35/62 (56)*
LOH on 17q 1/20 (5) 3/45 (7) 26/59 (45)*
LOH on 18q 0/18 (0) 7/44 (16) 19/56 (34)[dagger]
p53 mutation 1/20 (5) 6/47 (13) 24/62 (39)[dagger]
c-erbB-2 amplification 0/20 (0) 4/47 (9) 15/62 (24)[dagger]
int-2 amplification 2/20 (10) 3/47 (6) 9/62 (15)
*p < 0.001, [dagger]p < 0.01

Table 3. Estimation of risk ratio for recurrence of individual factors, before and after adjusting for histological grade, by Cox's regression model analyses in n0 IDC or ILC
Parameter Total no.
of patients
(n = 129)
No. with
recurrence
(n = 20)
Risk ratio
>(95% CI)
Adjusted
risk ratio*
(95% CI)
A. Histological grade
1 20 0 1.00
2 47 4
3 62 16 5.07 (1.69-15.17)
B. Tumor size
<= 2.0 40 4 1.00 1.00
2.1-5.0 81 15 2.12 (0.70-6.41) 1.19 (0.37-3.79)
>= 5.1 8 1 1.38 (0.15-12.32) 0.48 (0.05-4.52)
C. ER (fmol/mg protein)
>= 101 41 7 1.00 1.00
11-100 54 7 0.71 (0.25-2.03) 0.62 (0.22-1.80)
<= 10 22 5 1.33 (0.42-4.21) 0.71 (0.21-2.35)
Unknown 12 1
D. PgR (fmol/mg protein)
>= 101 41 4 1.00 1.00
11-100 40 8 1.93 (0.58-6.43) 1.51 (0.45-5.14)
<= 10 36 7 2.20 (0.64-7.51) 1.13 (0.31-4.14)
Unknown 12 1
E. LOH on 16p
- 88 11 1.00 1.00
+ 29 6 1.76 (0.65-4.75) 1.54 (0.57-4.17)
Unknown 12 3
F. LOH on 16q
- 58 10 1.00 1.00
+ 71 10 0.82 (0.34-1.98) 0.75 (0.31-1.80)
G. LOH on 17p
- 81 10 1.00 1.00
+ 47 10 1.83 (0.76-4.40) 1.01 (0.40-2.56)
Unknown 1
H. LOH on 17q
- 94 12 1.00 1.00
+ 30 8 2.34 (0.96-5.74) 1.27 (0.49-3.26)
Unknown 5
I. LOH on 18q
- 92 8 1.00 1.00
+ 26 10 4.72 (1.86-11.96) 3.29 (1.24-8.72)
Unknown 11
J. p53 mutation
- 99 14 1.00 1.00
+ 30 6 1.48 (0.57-3.85) 0.85 (0.32-2.27)
K. c-erbB-2 amplification
- 110 17 1.00 1.00
+ 19 3 0.93 (0.27-3.17) 0.53 (0.15-1.84)
L. int-2 amplification
- 115 14 1.00 1.00
+ 14 6 3.84 (1.47-10.00) 3.11 (1.18-8.16)
*Adjusted for histological grade


Figure 2. Correlation of accumulation of gene and chromosome alterations with early recurrence of n0 breast carcinomas. Disease-free survival curves for: a, group with 0-0.9 alterations (n = 46); b, group with 1.0-2.9 alterations (n = 54); c, group with 3.0 or more alterations (n = 29). There was a significant difference between the three curves (p < 0.025).


Figure 3. Disease-free survival curves for five groups (groups a-e) with different histological grade and number of gene or chromosome alterations: a, Grade 2 with a gene alteration score of 0-0.9 (n = 23); b, Grade 2 with a score of 1.0-2.9 (n = 21); c, Grade 3 with a score of 0-0.9 (n = 10); d, Grade 3 with a score of 1.0-2.9 (n = 27); e, Grades 2 and 3 with a score of >= 3.0 (n = 28). There was a significant difference between groups a, b and c and groups d and e (p < 0.001).

In the Cox's univariate regression model analysis, histological Grade 3 (risk ratio 5.07, 95% CI 1.69-15.17), LOH on 18q (risk ratio 4.72, CI 1.86-11.96) and int-2 amplification (risk ratio 3.84, CI 1.47-10.00) were significantly correlated with recurrence (Table 3). 18q (p = 0.02) and int-2 (p = 0.02) were still significantly correlated with recurrence after being adjusted for histological grade (Table 3). In another multivariate regression model analysis in which all variables were included simultaneously, histological grade was the only significant prognostic indicator (p = 0.03), while values for LOH on 16p (p = 0.06), LOH on 18q (p = 0.08) and low ER status (p = 0.09) approached significance.

Because the prevalence of the seven gene and chromosome alterations other than LOH on 16q were more frequent in the histological Grade 3 group than in the other grade groups, we investigated the association of the number of alterations with the prognosis. Information on all seven gene and chromosome alterations was available for 102 IDC/ILCs, while information on six and five alterations were available for 25 and two IDC/ILCs respectively. After the modulation, the number of gene or chromosome alterations was 0-0.9 in 46, 1.0-1.9 in 28, 2.0-2.9 in 27 and 3.0 or more in 28 tumors. All 20 Grade 1 IDC and 44 of the 47 Grade 2 IDC/ILC exhibited fewer than three gene alterations, whereas of the 62 Grade 3 IDC/ILC, 25 showed three or more gene alterations (p < 0.001, Table 4). Disease-free survival rates differed between the n0 groups with 0-0.9, 1.0-2.9 and 3.0 or more alterations (p = 0.01). The 4-yr disease-free survival rates were 93% in the group with 0-0.9 alterations, 80% in that with 1.0-2.9 alterations and 65% in the group with 3.0 or more alterations (Fig. 2).

After the exclusion of the Grade 1 cases, we drew survival curves for five subgroups: a, Grade 2 with a gene or chromosome alteration score of 0-0.9 (n = 23); b, Grade 2 with a score of 1.0-2.9 (n = 21); c, Grade 3 with a score of 0-0.9 (n = 10); d, Grade 3 with a score of 1.0-2.9 (n = 27); and e, Grades 2 and 3 with a score of 3.0 or more (n = 28). Subgroups d and e showed significantly higher recurrence rates than the other subgroups (p < 0.001) (Fig. 3).

The risk ratio of the n0 carcinoma group with 1.0-2.9 gene alterations was 2.33 (95% CI 0.62-8.77) and that of the group with 3.0 or more gene alterations was 5.56 (95% CI 1.51-20.6) if they were compared with the group with no gene alteration. The trend of increasing risk ratio was statistically significant. However, all these indicators were no more significant when histological grade was included in the same model (Table 5).

Table 4. Correlation between the number of gene alterations and the histological grade of atypia in n0 invasive breast carcinomas
Score (No. of gene No. of specimens
alterations) Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Total
0 (0-0.9) 13 23 10 46
1 (1.0-1.9) 4 12 12 28
2 (2.0-2.9) 3 9 15 27
Total for scores 0-2.9 20 44 37
3 (3.0-3.9) 0 1 7 8
4 (4.0-4.9) 0 1 10 11
5 (5.0-5.9) 0 1 8 9
6 ( >= 6.0) 0 0 0 0
Total for scores >= 3* 0 3 25
Total for all scores 20 47 62 129
*p < 0.001 between two groups

Table 5. Estimation of risk ratio for recurrence of the number of gene alterations, before and after adjusting for histological grade, by Cox's regression model analyses in n0 IDC or ILC
No. of gene Total no.
of patients
(n = 129)
No. with
recurrence
(n = 20)<
Risk ratio
(95% CI)
Adjusted
risk ratio*
(95% CI)
Score 0 20 0 1.00 1.00
Score 1-2 47 4 2.33 (0.62-8.77) 1.61 (0.41-6.36)
Score >= 3 62 16 5.56 (1.51-20.6) 2.53 (0.59-10.8)
(p for trend = 0.006) (p for trend = 0.19)
*Adjusted for histological grade

DISCUSSION

In n0 breast IDC/ILC, LOH on 16q was confirmed as occurring frequently regardless of difference in histological grade, whereas LOH on 17p, 17q and 18q, p53 mutation and c-erbB-2 amplification were accumulated in the Grade 3 group. LOH on 18q and int-2 gene amplification were indicators of high recurrence rate in n0 IDC/ILC, and the impact of these two alterations was of independent significance on early recurrence in a multivariate analysis. Several studies have shown the importance of p53 gene mutations and nuclear immunoreaction of the p53 protein as a prognostic indicator in n0 breast cancer (12,13). In a case-control study, Iwaya, et al. showed that p53 immunoreaction in cancer cell nuclei was a significant indicator of recurrence within 2 yrs of curative surgical therapy (11). The results of the present study differ from those of previous studies in that mutations of the p53 gene did not correlate with a high recurrence rate. Longer follow-up and comparison of the p53 gene mutation status with nuclear p53 protein immunoreactivity for individual patients would be necessary to ascertain the role of p53 in n0 cancer recurrence. It is still unclear whether c-erbB-2 gene amplification and overexpression of its protein have a significant impact on the prognosis of n0 breast carcinomas (39,40). Amplification of c-erbB-2 alone was of no significance as a prognostic factor in the n0 cancer group even after excluding DCIS and predominantly DCIS.

The number of these gene and chromosome alterations was shown to correlate with a high recurrence rate in invasive n0 breast cancers. In the majority of cases, disease-free survival curves significantly differed between the group with the gene or chromosome alteration score of 3.0 or more and the group with a score of 1.0-2.9. However, among Grade 3 cases, the curves did not differ between the group with a score of 3.0 or more and the group with a score of 1.0-2.9. The Grade 3 case group with the alteration score of 0-0.9 tended to be of better prognosis. These data and the results of the multivariate analysis indicated that the histological grade was superior to the accumulation of the eight gene and chromosome alterations that were examined in the present study as a practical prognostic factor of n0 breast cancer.

The accumulation of alterations of tumor-associated genes or chromosome sites were not investigated in the present study. Multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization methods have recently allowed the accumulation of a large number of gene and chromosome alterations to be observed in breast cancers (41-45). Application of these novel methods, which can analyze a large number of chromosome alterations at the same time, would be useful in the detection of n0 breast cancer patients at high risk of early recurrence.

In the present study, histological type and the histological grade of atypia were confirmed as indicators of a high-risk group for early recurrence of n0 breast carcinomas. Grade 1 IDC as well as histologically low-risk types such as DCIS and predominantly DCIS, medullary carcinoma, mucinous carcinoma and tubular carcinoma, were confirmed as carrying a low risk of early recurrence, whereas Grade 3 IDC/ILC, which showed a 4-yr recurrence rate of 23%, was considered to carry a high risk factor for early recurrence. In the Grade 2 group, the 4-yr recurrence rate was 5%, but recurrence tended to occur slowly. According to the data of Yoshimoto,et al., nuclear grade 3 is a prognostic indicator of early recurrence but not of recurrence after 5 years. While the disease-free survival rate of their nuclear grade 3 group decreased abruptly within 5 years and reached a plateau thereafter, that of the nuclear grade 2 group decreased gradually and in a linear manner even after 5 years (5). Because the grade of nuclear atypia is one of the constituents of the histological Grade, and both are well correlated, histological grade 2 might be an indicator of late recurrence, but not of early recurrence.

To identify groups at high risk of recurrence in multi-institutional protocol studies for the efficacy of adjuvant therapies, variations in the criteria for histological or nuclear grading between institutions should be reduced to a minimum. Such variations may originate largely from interobserver deviations in diagnostic criteria and in part from variations in the procedures for specimen processing among institutes. It has been shown that, when a grading scheme with specified guidelines is used, good reproducibility of grading can be achieved among pathologists (46,47). When these difficulties are overcome, histological grading or nuclear grading will be a practical and more reliable prognostic indicator for n0 breast carcinomas. Active treatment for such poor prognostic cases would be recommended.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Cancer Research and for the Comprehensive 10-Year Strategy for Cancer Control from the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan, and a Grant-in-Aid from the Uehara Memorial Foundation for Bioscience. The authors are grateful to Drs H. Yamamoto and T. Nanasawa for providing the surgically resected specimens and to Drs J. Arrand, D. Drayna, Y. Nakamura, G. Scherer and G. Thomas for providing the DNA probes. DNA probes were also provided by the Japanese Cancer Research Resources Bank (Tokyo, Japan) and the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD).

References

1. Glick JH, Gelber RD, Goldhirsch A, Senn H-J. Meeting highlights: adjuvant therapy for primary breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992;84:1479-85. MEDLINE Abstract

2. Rosen PP, Groshen S, Kinne DW, Norton L. Factors influencing prognosis in node-negative breast carcinoma: analysis of 767 T1N0M0/T2N0M0 patients with long-term follow-up. J Clin Oncol 1993;11:2090-100. MEDLINE Abstract

3. Sigurdsson H, Baldetorp B, Borg Å;, Dalber M, Fernö M, Killander D, et al. Indicators of prognosis in node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1990;322:1045-53. MEDLINE Abstract

4. Koyama H, Asaishi K, Yoshimoto M, Enomoto K, Yamamoto H, Uchida M, et al. Recurrence of node-negative breast cancer. Nyugan no Rinsho 1989;4:69-75 (in Japanese).

5. Yoshimoto M, Sakamoto G, Ohashi Y. Time dependency of the influence of prognostic factors on relapse in breast cancer. Cancer 1993;72:2993-3001. MEDLINE Abstract

6. Contesso G, Mouriesse H, Friedman S, Genin D, Sarrazin D, Rouesse J. The importance of histologic grade in long-term prognosis of breast cancer: a study of 1,010 patients, uniformly treated at the Institut Gustave-Roussy. J Clin Oncol 1987;5:1378-86. MEDLINE Abstract

7. Rank F, Dombernowsky P, Jespersen NCB, Pedersen BV, Keiding N. Histologic malignancy grading of invasive ductal breast carcinoma. A regression analysis of prognostic factors in low-risk carcinomas from a multicenter trial. Cancer 1987;60:1299-1305. MEDLINE Abstract

8. Henson DE, Ries L, Freedman LS, Carriaga M. Relationship among outcome, stage of disease, and histologic grade for 22,616 cases of breast cancer: the basis for a prognostic index. Cancer 1991;68:2142-9. MEDLINE Abstract

9. McGuire WL, Tandon AK, Allred DC, Chamness GC, Clark GM. How to use prognostic factors in axillary node-negative breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990;82:1006-15. MEDLINE Abstract

10. McGuire WL, Clark GM. Prognostic factors and treatment decisions in axillary-node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1992;326:1756-61. MEDLINE Abstract

11. Iwaya K, Tsuda H, Fukutomi T, Tsugane S, Suzuki M, Hirohashi S. Histologic grade and p53 immunoreaction as indicators of early recurrence of node-negative breast cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 1997;27:6-12. MEDLINE Abstract

12. Allred DC, Clark GM, Elledge R, Fuqua SAW, Brown RW, Chamness GC, et al. Association of p53 protein expression with tumor cell proliferation rate and clinical outcome in node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:200-6. MEDLINE Abstract

13. Silvestrini R, Veroneni S, Daidone MG, Benini E, Boracchi P, Mezzetti M, et al. The bcl-2 protein: a prognostic indicator strongly related to p53 protein in lymph node-negative breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994;86:499-504. MEDLINE Abstract

14. Weidner N, Folkman J, Pozza F, Bevilacqua P, Allred EN, Moore DH, et al. Tumor angiogenesis: a new significant and independent prognostic indicator in early-stage breast carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992;84:1875-87. MEDLINE Abstract

15. Toi M, Kashitani J, Tominaga T. Tumor angiogenesis is an independent prognostic indicator in primary breast carcinoma. Int J Cancer 1993;55:371-4. MEDLINE Abstract

16. Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Senn H-J, Glick JH, Gelber RD. Meeting highlights: international consensus panel on the treatment of primary breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87:1441-5. MEDLINE Abstract

17. Ali IU, Lidereau R, Theillet C, Callahan R. Reduction to homozygosity of genes on chromosome 11 in human breast neoplasia. Science 1987;238:185-8. MEDLINE Abstract

18. Berger MS, Locher GW, Sauer S, Gullick WJ, Waterfield MD, Groner B, et al. Correlation of c-erbB-2 gene amplification and protein expression in human breast carcinoma with nodal status and nuclear grading. Cancer Res 1988;48:1238-43. MEDLINE Abstract

19. Iwaya K, Tsuda H, Hiraide H, Tamaki K, Tamakuma S, Fukutomi T, et al. Nuclear p53 immunoreaction associated with poor prognosis of breast cancer. Jpn J Cancer Res 1991;82:835-40. MEDLINE Abstract

20. Bièche I, Champème MH, Matifas F, Hacène K, Callahan R, Lidereau R. Loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 7q and aggressive primary breast cancer. Lancet 1992;339:139-43. MEDLINE Abstract

21. Tsuda H, Callen DF, Fukutomi T, Nakamura Y, Hirohashi S. Allele loss on chromosome 16q24.2-qter occurs frequently in breast cancers irrespectively of differences in phenotype and extent of spread. Cancer Res 1994;54:513-7. MEDLINE Abstract

22. Histological Typing of Breast Tumours. International Histological Classification of Tumours. No. 2. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1981;18-22.

23. Tsuda H, Hirohashi S, Shimosato Y, Hirota T, Tsugane S, Watanabe S, et al. Correlation between histologic grade of malignancy and copy number of c-erbB-2 gene in breast carcinoma. A retrospective analysis of 176 cases. Cancer 1990;65:1794-800. MEDLINE Abstract

24. Tsuda H, Iwaya K, Fukutomi T, Hirohashi S. p53 mutations and c-erbB-2 amplification in intraductal and invasive breast carcinomas of high histologic grade. Jpn J Cancer Res 1993;84:394-401. MEDLINE Abstract

25. Julier C, Nakamura Y, Lathrop M, O'Connell P, Leppert M, Mohandas T, et al. A primary map of 24 loci on human chromosome 16. Genomics 1990;6:419-27. MEDLINE Abstract

26. Pearson PL, Kidd KK, Willard HF. Human gene mapping by recombinant DNA techniques. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1987;46:390-507. MEDLINE Abstract

27. Kondoleon S, Vissing H, Luo XY, Magenis RE, Kellogg J, Litt M. A hypervariable RFLP on chromosome 17p13 defined by an arbitrary single copy probe p144-D6. Nucleic Acids Res 1987;15:10605. MEDLINE Abstract

28. Nakamura Y, Lathrop M, O'Connell P, Leppert M, Barker D, Wright E, et al. A mapped set of DNA markers for human chromosome 17. Genomics 1988;2:302-9. MEDLINE Abstract

29. Barker D, Wright E, Nguyen K, Cannon L, Fain CP, Goldgar D, et al. Gene for von Recklinghausen neurofibromatosis is in the pericentromeric region of chromosome 17. Science 1987;236:1110-2.

30. Marlhens F, Delattre O, Bernard A, Olschwang S, Dutrillaux B, Thomas G. RFLP identified by the anonymous DNA segment OL VII E10 at 18q21.3 (HGM no. D18S8). Nucleic Acids Res 1987;15:1348. MEDLINE Abstract

31. Delattre O, Bernard A, Marlhens F, Monpezat J-P, Dutrillaux B, Thomas G. RFLP identified by the anonymous DNA segment OL VII A8 at 18q11 (HGM no. D18S7). Nucleic Acids Res 1987;15:1343. MEDLINE Abstract

32. Nishisho I, Miki T, Tateishi H, Takai S, Motomura K, Nakura J, et al. Isolation of DNA clones revealing restriction fragment length polymorphisms in the human genome. Jpn J Hum Genet 1986;31:249-58.

33. Yamamoto T, Ikawa S, Akiyama T, Semba K, Nomura N, Miyajima N, et al. Similarity of protein encoded by the human c-erbB-2 gene to epidermal growth factor receptor. Nature 1986;319:230-4.

34. Casey G, Smith R, McGillivray D, Peters G, Dickson C. Characterization and chromosome assignment of human homolog of int-2, a potential proto-oncogene. Mol Cell Biol 1986;6:502-10. MEDLINE Abstract

35. Yamada Y, Yoshida T, Hayashi K, Sekiya T, Yokota J, Hirohashi S, et al. p53 gene mutations in gastric cancer metastases and in gastric cancer cell lines derived from metastases. Cancer Res 1991;51:5800-5. MEDLINE Abstract

36. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457-81.

37. Peto R, Pike MC, Armitage P, Breslow NE, Cox DR, Howard SV, et al. Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient II. Br J Cancer 1977;35:1-39. MEDLINE Abstract

38. Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J Roy Stat Soc 1972;34:187-220.

39. Wright C, Angus B, Nicholson AL, Sainsbury JRC, Cairns J, Gullick WJ, et al. Expression of c-erbB-2 oncoprotein: a prognostic factor in human breast cancer. Cancer Res 1989;49:2087-90. MEDLINE Abstract

40. Allred DC, Clark GM, Tandon AK, Malina R, Tormey DC, Osborne CK, et al. HER-2/neu in node-negative breast cancer: prognostic significance of overexpression influenced by the presence of in situ carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 1992;10:559-605.

41. Devilee P, Thierry RF, Kievits T, Kolluri R, Hopman AH, Willard HF, et al. Detection of chromosome aneuploidy in interphase nuclei from human primary breast tumors using chromosome-specific repetitive DNA probes. Cancer Res 1988;48:5825-30. MEDLINE Abstract

42. Kallioniemi OP, Kallioniemi A, Kurisu W, Thor A, Chen LC, Smith HS, et al. ERBB2 amplification in breast cancer analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:5321-5.

43. Matsumura K, Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi O-P, Chen L-C, Smith HS, Pinkel D, et al. Deletion of chromosome 17p loci in breast cancer cells detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cancer Res 1992;52:3474-7. MEDLINE Abstract

44. Ichikawa D, Hashimoto N, Hoshima M, Yamaguchi T, Sawai K, Nakamura Y, et al. Analysis of numerical aberrations in specific chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as a diagnostic tool in breast cancer. Cancer 1996;77:2064-9. MEDLINE Abstract

45. Persons DL, Robinson RA, Hsu PH, Seelig SA, Borell TJ, Hartmann LC, et al. Chromosome-specific aneusomy in carcinoma of the breast. Clin Cancer Res 1996;2:883-8.

46. Gilchrist KW, Kalish L, Gould VE, Hirschl S, Imbriglia JZ, Levy WM. Interobserver reproducibility of histopathological features in stage II breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1985;5:3-10. MEDLINE Abstract

47. Dalton LW, Page DL, Dupont WD. Histologic grading of breast carcinoma. A reproducibility study. Cancer 1994;73:2765-70. MEDLINE Abstract


Received June 17, 1997; accepted September 2, 1997
For reprints and all correspondence: Hitoshi Tsuda, Pathology Division, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 1-1, Tsukiji 5-chome, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104, Japan
Abbreviations: LOH, loss of heterozygosity; IDC, invasive ductal carcinoma; ILC, invasive lobular carcinoma; DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ; ER, estrogen-receptor; PgR, progesterone-receptor.


This page is run by Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, as part of the OUP Journals
Comments and feedback: www-admin{at}oup.co.uk
Last modification: 19 May 1998
Copyright© Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1998.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
E. C. Dietze, M. L. Bowie, K. Mrozek, L. E. Caldwell, C. Neal, R. J. Marjoram, M. M. Troch, G. R. Bean, K. K. Yokoyama, C. A. Ibarra, et al.
CREB-binding protein regulates apoptosis and growth of HMECs grown in reconstituted ECM via laminin-5
J. Cell Sci., November 1, 2005; 118(21): 5005 - 5022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
G. P. Risbridger, J. F. Schmitt, and D. M. Robertson
Activins and Inhibins in Endocrine and Other Tumors
Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2001; 22(6): 836 - 858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
E. Iwamoto, T. Fukutomi, and S. Akashi-Tanaka
Validation and Problems of St-Gallen Recommendations of Adjuvant Therapy for Node-negative Invasive Breast Cancer in Japanese Patients
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2001; 31(6): 259 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsuda, H
Right arrow Articles by Hirohashi, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tsuda, H
Right arrow Articles by Hirohashi, S
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?