| Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology | Pages |
The Outcome of Surgical Treatment for Gastric Carcinoma in the Elderly
Introduction
Patients and Methods
Results
Patients' Characteristics
Morbidity and Mortality
Survival
Discussion
References
The Outcome of Surgical Treatment for Gastric Carcinoma in the Elderly
Surgeons are increasingly being faced with the problem of treating elderly gastric carcinoma patients. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the feasibility of surgical treatment for these patients. Among 4740 gastric carcinoma patients treated from 1971 to 1990, 112 (2.4%) were aged 80 or over. The results of treatment in this elderly group were compared retrospectively with those in 2664 younger gastric carcinoma patients (aged 50-69, control group, 56.2%). The TNM stage distribution and the curative resection rates (75.9 vs 81.4%) were similar between the groups. Reduced nodal dissection was more common in the elderly group. The elderly had a higher incidence of preoperative risk factors (76.8 vs 53.1%) and 90-day mortality (10.7 vs 3.9%). However, the postoperative complication rates were similar between the groups. The 90-day mortality rates in the elderly group were higher in the subgroups undergoing total gastrectomy or D2 dissection. In the patients without pre-existing morbidity, the 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality and postoperative complications were similar between the groups. The 5-year survival rate after curative resection of the elderly group was significantly lower than that of the control group (44.4 vs 74.0%). This difference lost significance when non-cancer death was excluded (62.5 vs 79.9%). We believe that, although gastrectomy can be carried out safely in elderly patients, extended surgery should be limited to those without preoperative morbidity.
Introduction
The Japanese population is ageing. The average life expectancy is currently 77 years for men and 83 years for women (1). Between 1984 and 1994, the proportion of the population over 80 years of age has increased from 1.7 to 3.0% (1). Gastric carcinoma is still a major cause of death in Japan. The number of patients aged 80 or above with gastric carcinoma has increased in recent years despite a decrease in the incidence of this disease. The operative procedure used for such patients must be chosen with care, considering both radicality and predicted hospital mortality, since elderly patients have more preoperative risk factors (2,3). The purpose of this retrospective study was to elucidate the feasibility of surgical treatment for these patients.
Patients and Methods
From 1971 to 1990, 4740 patients underwent laparotomy for gastric carcinoma at the Department of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo and 112 (2.4%) were aged 80 or above (elderly group; mean age 82.7 years). The control group (the age group with the highest incidence of gastric carcinoma) consisted of 2664 patients, aged 50-69, who accounted for 56.2% of the total number of gastric carcinoma patients (mean age 60.0). Surgical specimens were examined and scored according to the General Rules of the Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer (4) and the TNM system (5). Relevant statistics for all patients were obtained from the city registry office and follow-up records. The operative mortality rate was defined as death within 30 days of the operation. In addition, the 90-day mortality rate was also studied. Cumulative 5-year survival rates were calculated by the life-table method with Greenwood's 95% confidence limits (6). The chi-squared test was used to assess statistical significance.
Table 1
| Age (years) | pa | ||
| [ge]80 | 50-69 | ||
| Gender | N.S. | ||
| Male | 79 (70.5%) | 1818 (68.2%) | |
| Female | 33 (29.5%) | 846 (31.8%) | |
| Stage (TNM) | N.S. | ||
| I | 39 (34.8%) | 1250 (46.9%) | |
| II | 18 (16.1%) | 265 (9.9%) | |
| III | 20 (17.9%) | 505 (19.0%) | |
| IV | 25 (22.3%) | 511 (19.2%) | |
| Unknown | 10 (8.9%) | 133 (5.0%) | |
| Curability | N.S. | ||
| Curative resection | 85 (75.9%) | 2169 (81.4%) | |
| Palliative resection | 15 (13.4%) | 344 (12.9%) | |
| Exploration/others | 12 (10.7%) | 151 (5.7%) | |
| Type of resection | N.S. | ||
| Total gastrectomy | 32 (32.0%) | 644 (25.6%) | |
| Distal gastrectomy | 64 (64.0%) | 1744 (69.4%) | |
| Others | 4 (4.0%) | 125 (5.0%) | |
| Combined resection | N.S. | ||
| Spleen | 14 (12.5%) | 397 (14.9%) | |
| Distal pancreas | 7 (6.3%) | 208 (7.8%) | |
| Nodal dissection (curative resection) | 0.001 | ||
| D0,1 | 37 (43.5%) | 285 (13.1%) | |
| D2 | 48 (56.5%) | 1823 (84.1%) | |
| D3,4 | 0 (0%) | 61 (2.8%) | |
Results
Patients' Characteristics
The ratio of males to females was 2.3:1 in the elderly group and 2.1:1 in the control group (Table 1). There was no significant difference in the distribution of TNM stages between the two groups, although the control group included more stage I patients.
The resection rate and curative resection rate were similar in the two groups. The frequencies of total gastrectomy and adjacent structure resection were similar. However, the extent of nodal dissection was significantly different between the two groups. Among curative cases, 43.5% underwent D0,1 operation in the elderly group, while 86.9% underwent extended dissection in the control group.
Morbidity and Mortality
Table 2 summarizes pre-existing morbidity in the two groups. The rate of preoperative morbidity was higher in the elderly group than in the control group (76.8 vs 53.1, p < 0.001). Cardiovascular impairment was the predominant preoperative risk factor in both groups. There were significant differences in the incidence of cardiovascular impairment, renal impairment and anemia between the two groups.
Table 3 shows postoperative complications. The overall frequency of postoperative complications was similar in the two groups (32.1 vs 27.9%). Only respiratory impairment was significantly more common in the elderly group (p < 0.05).
The operative mortality rates were 2.7% in the elderly group and 0.9% in the control group (p = 0.17). The 90-day mortality rates were 10.7 and 3.9%, respectively (p < 0.01).
Table 4 summarizes the patients who underwent resection. The operative mortality rates were 3.0% in the elderly group and 0.8% in the control group overall (p < 0.1). The 90-day mortality rates were 8.0 and 2.5% overall, respectively (p < 0.01). In the patients without pre-existing morbidity, the frequencies of death during operation, death within 3 months of the operation and postoperative complication were similar between the groups.
Table 2
| Age (years) | pa | ||
| [ge]80 | 50-69 | ||
| Respiratory | 15 (13.4%) | 262 (9.8%) | N.S. |
| Cardiovascular | 34 (30.4%) | 410 (15.4%) | 0.001 |
| Hepatic | 2 (1.8%) | 126 (4.7%) | N.S. |
| Renal | 12 (10.7%) | 77 (2.9%) | 0.001 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 14 (12.5%) | 293 (11.0%) | N.S. |
| Anemia | 24 (21.4%) | 293 (11.0%) | 0.01 |
| Overall | 86 (76.8%) | 1410 (53.1%) | 0.001 |
Table 3
| Age (years) | pa | ||
| [ge]80 | 50-69 | ||
| Non-surgical | |||
| Respiratory | 9 (8.0%) | 96 (3.6%) | 0.05 |
| Cardiovascular | 4 (3.6%) | 46 (1.7%) | N.S. |
| Hepatic | 4 (3.6%) | 113 (4.2%) | N.S. |
| Renal | 3 (2.7%) | 23 (0.9%) | N.S. |
| Diabetes mellitus | 2 (1.8%) | 25 (0.9%) | N.S. |
| Surgical | |||
| Stenosis, obstruction | 5 (4.5%) | 94 (3.5%) | N.S. |
| Hemorrhage | 4 (3.6%) | 46 (1.7%) | N.S. |
| Anastomotic leakage | 6 (5.4%) | 154 (5.8%) | N.S. |
| Intra-abdominal infection | 8 (7.1%) | 288 (10.8%) | N.S. |
| Overall | 36 (32.1%) | 742 (27.9%) | N.S. |
Table 4
| Number of patients | 30-day mortality (%) | 90-day mortality (%) | Complication (%) | |||||
| [ge]80 | 50-69 | [ge]80 | 50-69 | [ge]80 | 50-69 | [ge]80 | 50-69 | |
| All resected cases | ||||||||
| Overall | 100 | 2513 | 3.0a | 0.8a | 8.0b | 2.5b | 35.0 | 28.4 |
| Preoperative risk | ||||||||
| Yes | 76 | 1309 | 3.9 | 1.3 | 9.2c | 3.5c | 39.5 | 31.2 |
| No | 24 | 1204 | 0 | 0.2 | 4.2 | 1.5 | 20.8 | 25.2 |
| Resection type | ||||||||
| Total gastrectomy | ||||||||
| Overall | 32 | 644 | 9.4d | 1.4d | 18.8e | 4.4e | 62.5 | 47.0 |
| Preoperative risk | ||||||||
| Yes | 25 | 344 | 12.0f | 2.3f | 24.0g | 5.8g | 72.0h | 48.0h |
| No | 7 | 300 | 0 | 0.3 | 0 | 2.7 | 28.6 | 46.0 |
| Distal gastrectomy | ||||||||
| Overall | 64 | 1744 | 0 | 0.5 | 3.1 | 1.7 | 23.4 | 20.5 |
| Preoperative risk | ||||||||
| Yes | 49 | 894 | 0 | 0.9 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 24.5 | 23.7 |
| No | 15 | 850 | 0 | 0 | 6.7 | 0.9 | 20.0 | 17.1 |
| Nodal dissection | ||||||||
| D0,1 | ||||||||
| Overall | 48 | 514 | 2.1 | 1.4 | 8.3 | 6.4 | 37.5 | 27.0 |
| Preoperative risk | ||||||||
| Yes | 37 | 314 | 2.7 | 2.2 | 10.8 | 8.6 | 40.5 | 28.3 |
| No | 11 | 200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.0 | 27.3 | 25.0 |
| D2 | ||||||||
| Overall | 51 | 1933 | 3.9 | 0.7 | 7.8i | 1.6i | 33.3 | 27.6 |
| Preoperative risk | ||||||||
| Yes | 39 | 960 | 5.1 | 1.0 | 7.7j | 2.1j | 38.5 | 31.2 |
| No | 12 | 973 | 0 | 0.3 | 8.3 | 1.0 | 16.7 | 23.9 |
| Combined resection | ||||||||
| Spleen | ||||||||
| Overall | 14 | 397 | 7.1 | 2.3 | 14.3 | 5.8 | 71.4 | 54.7 |
| Preoperative risk | ||||||||
| Yes | 10 | 215 | 10.0 | 2.8 | 20.0 | 6.5 | 90.0 | 57.2 |
| No | 4 | 182 | 0 | 1.6 | 0 | 4.9 | 25.0 | 51.6 |
| Distal pancreas | ||||||||
| Overall | 7 | 208 | 0 | 1.9 | 0 | 5.3 | 57.1 | 67.3 |
| Preoperative risk | ||||||||
| Yes | 5 | 115 | 0 | 1.7 | 0 | 4.3 | 80.0 | 70.4 |
| No | 2 | 93 | 0 | 2.2 | 0 | 6.5 | 0 | 63.4 |
In the subgroup undergoing total gastrectomy, both the death rate during operation and the 90-day mortality rate were significantly higher in the elderly group than in the control group. The 90-day mortality rate in the elderly group was also significantly higher in the subgroup undergoing D2 dissection than for the younger patients having D2 dissection.
Table 5
| Age (years) | ||
| [ge]80 | 50-69 | |
| Recurrence | 14 (16.5%) | 361 (16.6%) |
| Non-cancer death | 28 (32.9%)a | 166 (7.7%)a |
| Operative mortality | 3 (3.5%) | 15 (0.7%) |
| Alive | 40 (47.1%) | 1627 (75.0%) |
| Total | 85 (100%) | 2169 (100%) |
Survival
The overall 5-year survival rate of the elderly group was significantly lower than that of the control group [32.6% (42.4-22.9%) vs 61.1% (63.0-59.1%), p < 0.05]. When curative surgery was performed, the 5-year survival rate of elderly patients was again significantly lower than that of the controls [44.4% (52.3-28.5%) vs 74.0% (75.9-72.0%), p < 0.05]. This significant difference, however, was not observed when non-cancer deaths were excluded [62.5% (78.8-46.2%) vs 79.9% (81.8-78.0%)].
The elderly group had a higher non-cancer death rate than the younger group (Table 5). Twenty-eight elderly patients (~30%) died from causes other than primary cancer within 5 years of the curative operation.
Preoperative risk factors were observed in 25 patients (89.3%) of those elderly patients who died from causes other than primary cancer, whereas it was observed in 71 patients (43.1%) in the control group. Moreover, nine elderly patients, all of whom had preoperative risk factors, died within 1 year.
The recurrence rates were similar between the groups.
Discussion
Many Western investigators have reported low resectability and extremely poor survival in elderly patients, apparently reflecting the advanced stage at which these carcinomas are generally diagnosed (7,8). In our series, however, the resectability (89.3%) and the proportion of curative resections (75.9%) in the elderly group were much higher than those previously reported in Western countries and did not differ significantly from those in the control group. Early detection of gastric carcinoma appears to play as important a role in the elderly as it does in the general population.
The rate of preoperative surgical risk factors in these elderly patients was high, as has been reported previously (2,3), while the frequency of postoperative complications was similar between the two groups in our series. Reduced extent of surgery in the elderly patients may have contributed to these relatively low complications.
Despite advances in operating techniques and improvements in perioperative care, the mortality rate was higher in elderly patients than in the control group. However, the rate was satisfactory and much lower than that in Western countries, even in the elderly patients with preoperative morbidity (7,8).
Our results showed that age alone should not be considered a reason to withhold surgical treatment from elderly patients regarding morbidity and mortality.
However, extent of surgery in elderly patients should be carefully considered. Total gastrectomy and extended nodal dissection were both associated with higher operative mortality and 90-day mortality in the elderly group, especially in those with preoperative morbidity. Patients without preoperative surgical risk factors can be good candidates for extended surgery because the rates of morbidity and mortality in these patients were comparable to those in the control group.
Survival rates in the elderly group were worse, both overall and after curative resection, than those in the control group, partly because the incidence of deaths from causes other than primary cancer was high in the elderly group. However, the 5-year survival rates (44.4% after curative resection and 62.5% after excluding non-cancer deaths) were high enough to support the operative treatment for the elderly patients.
The preoperative risk factors might be associated with not only postoperative mortality but also long-term survival because preoperative risk factors had existed in about 90% of patients who died from causes other than primary cancer within 5 years after being operated upon.
In conclusion, although gastrectomy can be carried out safely in elderly patients, extended surgery should be limited to those without preoperative morbidity.
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
This page is run by Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, as part of the OUP Journals
Comments and feedback: www-admin{at}oup.co.uk
Last modification: 19 May 1998
Copyright© Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1998.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
S.-H. Kong, D. J. Park, H.-J. Lee, H. C. Jung, K. U. Lee, K. J. Choe, and H.-K. Yang
Clinicopathologic Features of Asymptomatic Gastric Adenocarcinoma Patients in Korea
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 1, 2004;
34(1):
1 - 7.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
This Article ![]()
![]()
Abstract
![]()
Alert me when this article is cited
![]()
Alert me if a correction is posted
![]()
Services ![]()
![]()
Email this article to a friend
![]()
Similar articles in this journal
![]()
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
![]()
Similar articles in PubMed
![]()
Alert me to new issues of the journal
![]()
Add to My Personal Archive
![]()
Download to citation manager
![]()
Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
![]()
Request Permissions
![]()
Google Scholar ![]()
![]()
Articles by Katai, H
![]()
Articles by Maruyama, K
![]()
Search for Related Content
![]()
PubMed ![]()
![]()
PubMed Citation
![]()
Articles by Katai, H
![]()
Articles by Maruyama, K
![]()
Social Bookmarking ![]()
![]()
What's this?