Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katai, H
Right arrow Articles by Maruyama, K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Katai, H
Right arrow Articles by Maruyama, K
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology Pages 112-115


The Outcome of Surgical Treatment for Gastric Carcinoma in the Elderly
Introduction
Patients and Methods
Results
   Patients' Characteristics
   Morbidity and Mortality
   Survival
Discussion
References

The Outcome of Surgical Treatment for Gastric Carcinoma in the Elderly

The Outcome of Surgical Treatment for Gastric Carcinoma in the Elderly

Hitoshi Katai, Mitsuru Sasako, Takeshi Sano, Keiichi Maruyama

Department of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

Surgeons are increasingly being faced with the problem of treating elderly gastric carcinoma patients. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the feasibility of surgical treatment for these patients. Among 4740 gastric carcinoma patients treated from 1971 to 1990, 112 (2.4%) were aged 80 or over. The results of treatment in this elderly group were compared retrospectively with those in 2664 younger gastric carcinoma patients (aged 50-69, control group, 56.2%). The TNM stage distribution and the curative resection rates (75.9 vs 81.4%) were similar between the groups. Reduced nodal dissection was more common in the elderly group. The elderly had a higher incidence of preoperative risk factors (76.8 vs 53.1%) and 90-day mortality (10.7 vs 3.9%). However, the postoperative complication rates were similar between the groups. The 90-day mortality rates in the elderly group were higher in the subgroups undergoing total gastrectomy or D2 dissection. In the patients without pre-existing morbidity, the 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality and postoperative complications were similar between the groups. The 5-year survival rate after curative resection of the elderly group was significantly lower than that of the control group (44.4 vs 74.0%). This difference lost significance when non-cancer death was excluded (62.5 vs 79.9%). We believe that, although gastrectomy can be carried out safely in elderly patients, extended surgery should be limited to those without preoperative morbidity.

Key words: gastric carcinoma - elderly - surgical treatment

Introduction

The Japanese population is ageing. The average life expectancy is currently 77 years for men and 83 years for women (1). Between 1984 and 1994, the proportion of the population over 80 years of age has increased from 1.7 to 3.0% (1). Gastric carcinoma is still a major cause of death in Japan. The number of patients aged 80 or above with gastric carcinoma has increased in recent years despite a decrease in the incidence of this disease. The operative procedure used for such patients must be chosen with care, considering both radicality and predicted hospital mortality, since elderly patients have more preoperative risk factors (2,3). The purpose of this retrospective study was to elucidate the feasibility of surgical treatment for these patients.

Patients and Methods

From 1971 to 1990, 4740 patients underwent laparotomy for gastric carcinoma at the Department of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo and 112 (2.4%) were aged 80 or above (elderly group; mean age 82.7 years). The control group (the age group with the highest incidence of gastric carcinoma) consisted of 2664 patients, aged 50-69, who accounted for 56.2% of the total number of gastric carcinoma patients (mean age 60.0). Surgical specimens were examined and scored according to the General Rules of the Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer (4) and the TNM system (5). Relevant statistics for all patients were obtained from the city registry office and follow-up records. The operative mortality rate was defined as death within 30 days of the operation. In addition, the 90-day mortality rate was also studied. Cumulative 5-year survival rates were calculated by the life-table method with Greenwood's 95% confidence limits (6). The chi-squared test was used to assess statistical significance.

Table 1. Patients' characteristics
  Age (years) pa
  [ge]80 50-69  
Gender     N.S.
Male 79 (70.5%) 1818 (68.2%)  
Female 33 (29.5%) 846 (31.8%)  
Stage (TNM)     N.S.
I 39 (34.8%) 1250 (46.9%)  
II 18 (16.1%) 265 (9.9%)  
III 20 (17.9%) 505 (19.0%)  
IV 25 (22.3%) 511 (19.2%)  
Unknown 10 (8.9%) 133 (5.0%)  
Curability     N.S.
Curative resection 85 (75.9%) 2169 (81.4%)  
Palliative resection 15 (13.4%) 344 (12.9%)  
Exploration/others 12 (10.7%) 151 (5.7%)  
Type of resection     N.S.
Total gastrectomy 32 (32.0%) 644 (25.6%)  
Distal gastrectomy 64 (64.0%) 1744 (69.4%)  
Others 4 (4.0%) 125 (5.0%)  
Combined resection     N.S.
Spleen 14 (12.5%) 397 (14.9%)  
Distal pancreas 7 (6.3%) 208 (7.8%)  
Nodal dissection (curative resection)     0.001
D0,1 37 (43.5%) 285 (13.1%)  
D2 48 (56.5%) 1823 (84.1%)  
D3,4 0 (0%) 61 (2.8%)  
aChi-squared test.

Results

Patients' Characteristics

The ratio of males to females was 2.3:1 in the elderly group and 2.1:1 in the control group (Table 1). There was no significant difference in the distribution of TNM stages between the two groups, although the control group included more stage I patients.

The resection rate and curative resection rate were similar in the two groups. The frequencies of total gastrectomy and adjacent structure resection were similar. However, the extent of nodal dissection was significantly different between the two groups. Among curative cases, 43.5% underwent D0,1 operation in the elderly group, while 86.9% underwent extended dissection in the control group.

Morbidity and Mortality

Table 2 summarizes pre-existing morbidity in the two groups. The rate of preoperative morbidity was higher in the elderly group than in the control group (76.8 vs 53.1, p < 0.001). Cardiovascular impairment was the predominant preoperative risk factor in both groups. There were significant differences in the incidence of cardiovascular impairment, renal impairment and anemia between the two groups.

Table 3 shows postoperative complications. The overall frequency of postoperative complications was similar in the two groups (32.1 vs 27.9%). Only respiratory impairment was significantly more common in the elderly group (p < 0.05).

The operative mortality rates were 2.7% in the elderly group and 0.9% in the control group (p = 0.17). The 90-day mortality rates were 10.7 and 3.9%, respectively (p < 0.01).

Table 4 summarizes the patients who underwent resection. The operative mortality rates were 3.0% in the elderly group and 0.8% in the control group overall (p < 0.1). The 90-day mortality rates were 8.0 and 2.5% overall, respectively (p < 0.01). In the patients without pre-existing morbidity, the frequencies of death during operation, death within 3 months of the operation and postoperative complication were similar between the groups.

Table 2. Pre-existing morbidity
  Age (years) pa
  [ge]80 50-69  
Respiratory 15 (13.4%) 262 (9.8%) N.S.
Cardiovascular 34 (30.4%) 410 (15.4%) 0.001
Hepatic 2 (1.8%) 126 (4.7%) N.S.
Renal 12 (10.7%) 77 (2.9%) 0.001
Diabetes mellitus 14 (12.5%) 293 (11.0%) N.S.
Anemia 24 (21.4%) 293 (11.0%) 0.01
Overall 86 (76.8%) 1410 (53.1%) 0.001
aChi-squared test.

Table 3. Incidence of postoperative complications
  Age (years) pa
  [ge]80 50-69
Non-surgical
Respiratory 9 (8.0%) 96 (3.6%) 0.05
Cardiovascular 4 (3.6%) 46 (1.7%) N.S.
Hepatic 4 (3.6%) 113 (4.2%) N.S.
Renal 3 (2.7%) 23 (0.9%) N.S.
Diabetes mellitus 2 (1.8%) 25 (0.9%) N.S.
Surgical
Stenosis, obstruction 5 (4.5%) 94 (3.5%) N.S.
Hemorrhage 4 (3.6%) 46 (1.7%) N.S.
Anastomotic leakage 6 (5.4%) 154 (5.8%) N.S.
Intra-abdominal infection 8 (7.1%) 288 (10.8%) N.S.
Overall 36 (32.1%) 742 (27.9%) N.S.
aChi-squared test.

Table 4. Subgroup analysis of patients who underwent resection
  Number of patients 30-day mortality (%) 90-day mortality (%) Complication (%)
  [ge]80 50-69 [ge]80 50-69 [ge]80 50-69 [ge]80 50-69
All resected cases
Overall 100 2513 3.0a 0.8a 8.0b 2.5b 35.0 28.4
Preoperative risk
Yes 76 1309 3.9 1.3 9.2c 3.5c 39.5 31.2
No 24 1204 0 0.2 4.2 1.5 20.8 25.2
Resection type
Total gastrectomy
Overall 32 644 9.4d 1.4d 18.8e 4.4e 62.5 47.0
Preoperative risk
Yes 25 344 12.0f 2.3f 24.0g 5.8g 72.0h 48.0h
No 7 300 0 0.3 0 2.7 28.6 46.0
Distal gastrectomy
Overall 64 1744 0 0.5 3.1 1.7 23.4 20.5
Preoperative risk
Yes 49 894 0 0.9 2.0 2.3 24.5 23.7
No 15 850 0 0 6.7 0.9 20.0 17.1
Nodal dissection
D0,1
Overall 48 514 2.1 1.4 8.3 6.4 37.5 27.0
Preoperative risk
Yes 37 314 2.7 2.2 10.8 8.6 40.5 28.3
No 11 200 0 0 0 3.0 27.3 25.0
D2
Overall 51 1933 3.9 0.7 7.8i 1.6i 33.3 27.6
Preoperative risk
Yes 39 960 5.1 1.0 7.7j 2.1j 38.5 31.2
No 12 973 0 0.3 8.3 1.0 16.7 23.9
Combined resection
Spleen
Overall 14 397 7.1 2.3 14.3 5.8 71.4 54.7
Preoperative risk
Yes 10 215 10.0 2.8 20.0 6.5 90.0 57.2
No 4 182 0 1.6 0 4.9 25.0 51.6
Distal pancreas
Overall 7 208 0 1.9 0 5.3 57.1 67.3
Preoperative risk
Yes 5 115 0 1.7 0 4.3 80.0 70.4
No 2 93 0 2.2 0 6.5 0 63.4
a, j p < 0.1. c, f, h p < 0.05. b, d, e, g, i p < 0.01.

In the subgroup undergoing total gastrectomy, both the death rate during operation and the 90-day mortality rate were significantly higher in the elderly group than in the control group. The 90-day mortality rate in the elderly group was also significantly higher in the subgroup undergoing D2 dissection than for the younger patients having D2 dissection.

Table 5. Distribution of cause of death within 5 years of curative operation
  Age (years)
  [ge]80 50-69
Recurrence 14 (16.5%) 361 (16.6%)
Non-cancer death 28 (32.9%)a 166 (7.7%)a
Operative mortality 3 (3.5%) 15 (0.7%)
Alive 40 (47.1%) 1627 (75.0%)
Total 85 (100%) 2169 (100%)
ap < 0.001: chi-squared test.

Survival

The overall 5-year survival rate of the elderly group was significantly lower than that of the control group [32.6% (42.4-22.9%) vs 61.1% (63.0-59.1%), p < 0.05]. When curative surgery was performed, the 5-year survival rate of elderly patients was again significantly lower than that of the controls [44.4% (52.3-28.5%) vs 74.0% (75.9-72.0%), p < 0.05]. This significant difference, however, was not observed when non-cancer deaths were excluded [62.5% (78.8-46.2%) vs 79.9% (81.8-78.0%)].

The elderly group had a higher non-cancer death rate than the younger group (Table 5). Twenty-eight elderly patients (~30%) died from causes other than primary cancer within 5 years of the curative operation.

Preoperative risk factors were observed in 25 patients (89.3%) of those elderly patients who died from causes other than primary cancer, whereas it was observed in 71 patients (43.1%) in the control group. Moreover, nine elderly patients, all of whom had preoperative risk factors, died within 1 year.

The recurrence rates were similar between the groups.

Discussion

Many Western investigators have reported low resectability and extremely poor survival in elderly patients, apparently reflecting the advanced stage at which these carcinomas are generally diagnosed (7,8). In our series, however, the resectability (89.3%) and the proportion of curative resections (75.9%) in the elderly group were much higher than those previously reported in Western countries and did not differ significantly from those in the control group. Early detection of gastric carcinoma appears to play as important a role in the elderly as it does in the general population.

The rate of preoperative surgical risk factors in these elderly patients was high, as has been reported previously (2,3), while the frequency of postoperative complications was similar between the two groups in our series. Reduced extent of surgery in the elderly patients may have contributed to these relatively low complications.

Despite advances in operating techniques and improvements in perioperative care, the mortality rate was higher in elderly patients than in the control group. However, the rate was satisfactory and much lower than that in Western countries, even in the elderly patients with preoperative morbidity (7,8).

Our results showed that age alone should not be considered a reason to withhold surgical treatment from elderly patients regarding morbidity and mortality.

However, extent of surgery in elderly patients should be carefully considered. Total gastrectomy and extended nodal dissection were both associated with higher operative mortality and 90-day mortality in the elderly group, especially in those with preoperative morbidity. Patients without preoperative surgical risk factors can be good candidates for extended surgery because the rates of morbidity and mortality in these patients were comparable to those in the control group.

Survival rates in the elderly group were worse, both overall and after curative resection, than those in the control group, partly because the incidence of deaths from causes other than primary cancer was high in the elderly group. However, the 5-year survival rates (44.4% after curative resection and 62.5% after excluding non-cancer deaths) were high enough to support the operative treatment for the elderly patients.

The preoperative risk factors might be associated with not only postoperative mortality but also long-term survival because preoperative risk factors had existed in about 90% of patients who died from causes other than primary cancer within 5 years after being operated upon.

In conclusion, although gastrectomy can be carried out safely in elderly patients, extended surgery should be limited to those without preoperative morbidity.

References

1. Abridged Life Table for Japan, 1994. Tokyo: Statistics and Information Department, Minister's Secretariat, Ministry of Health and Welfare, 1994.

2. Bandoh T, Isoyama T, Toyoshima H. Total gastrectomy for gastric cancer in the elderly. Surgery 1991;109:136-42. MEDLINE Abstract

3. Takeda J, Tanaka T, Koufuji K, Kodama I, Tsuji Y, Kakegawa T. Gastric cancer surgery in patients aged at least 80 years old. Hepato-Gastroenterology 1994;41:516-20. MEDLINE Abstract

4. Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer. Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma. Tokyo: Kanehara, 1995.

5. Union Internationale Contre le Cancrum. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 4th ed. Berlin: Springer, 1987.

6. Union Internationale Contre le Cancrum. TNM General Rules, 2nd ed. Geneva: Springer, 1974.

7. Fielding JWL, Powell DJ, Allum WH, Waterhouse JAH, McConkey CC, editors. Clinical Cancer Monographs, Vol 3, Cancer of the Stomach. London: Macmillan, 1991.

8. Damhuis RAM, Tilanus HW. The influence of age on resection rates and postoperative mortality in 2773 patients with gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer 1995;31A:928-31.


Received February 27, 1997; accepted July 23, 1997
For reprints and all correspondence: Hitoshi Katai, Department of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1, Tsukiji 5-chome, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104, Japan


This page is run by Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, as part of the OUP Journals
Comments and feedback: www-admin{at}oup.co.uk
Last modification: 19 May 1998
Copyright© Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1998.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
S.-H. Kong, D. J. Park, H.-J. Lee, H. C. Jung, K. U. Lee, K. J. Choe, and H.-K. Yang
Clinicopathologic Features of Asymptomatic Gastric Adenocarcinoma Patients in Korea
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2004; 34(1): 1 - 7.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katai, H
Right arrow Articles by Maruyama, K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Katai, H
Right arrow Articles by Maruyama, K
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?