| Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology | Pages |
Analysis of 57 Nonagenarian Cancer Patients Treated by Radical Radiotherapy: a Survey of Eight Institutions
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Characteristics of the Patients
Comorbidity and Mental Status
Radiotherapy
Specific Disease Sites
Prognostic Outcome
Social Issues
Discussion
Acknowledgments
References
Analysis of 57 Nonagenarian Cancer Patients Treated by Radical Radiotherapy: a Survey of Eight Institutions
Methods: A retrospective survey was conducted for patients 90 years of age or older who received radiotherapy with radical intent in eight leading institutions in Japan from 1990 through 1995.
Results: Fifty-seven nonagenarian patients were studied. Their ages ranged up to 98 (median 91) and there was a strong female preponderance (M/F: 16/41). The distribution by site was as follows: head and neck, 16; skin and adnexae, 11; uterine cervix, 7; esophagus, 6. The prevailing histopathological diagnosis was squamous cell carcinoma (34), followed by adenocarcinomas (8). The highest age at RT was 98 years [female, skin cancer, died of senility 2.5 years after treatment, with no evidence of disease (NED)] and the longest survivor is 102 years old (female, glottic cancer T2, age at RT 93, alive NED for 8 years, uses wheel-chair). The rate of completion of treatment was 75% (43/57), if the treatment field was limited to the gross primary tumor volume only and if the cumulative dose was above 80% of the tolerable adult dose. Familial escort was necessary for most of the patients in completing the day-to-day RT.
Conclusion: Radiotherapy is feasible with radical intent even in the elderly, if the treatment field is limited to the gross primary tumor volume only, if the cumulative dose is above 80% of the tolerable adult dose and if familial support is adequate.
INTRODUCTION
The number of the elderly cancer patients has been increasing as the elderly population continues to grow. The purpose of this study was to determine whether radiotherapy is feasible for elderly cancer patients and to elucidate factors essential in applying radical radiotherapy (RT) to the elderly, by surveying the available data on radiotherapy for nonagenarian cancer patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A retrospective survey was conducted for patients 90 years of age or older who received radiotherapy with radical intent in eight leading institutions in Japan from 1990 through 1995. The survey items included patient identification, the site of disease, histopathology, clinical stage, coexistence and the severity of comorbidity and other physical handicaps, performance status before the treatment, disease history including radiation therapy, the response and adverse reactions to treatment, outcome of treatment and status of familial support. The follow-up of the patients ranged from 2.5 to 8 years.
RESULTS
Characteristics of the Patients
Fifty-seven records of nonagenarian cancer patients were collected, representing 0.24% of all patients treated at the institutions (57/23 752). The age ranged from 90 to 98 years (median: 91) and the ratio of male to female was 16:41, with a strong female preponderance. There were 42 patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0-2 and 15 with PS 3 and 4 (Table 1).
Table 1.
| Rate of nonagenarians | 0.24% (57/23 752) |
| Age range (years) | 90-98 (median 91) |
| Gender: female:male | 41:16 |
| ECOG performance status before treatment: PS 0-2:PS 3,4 | 42:15 |
| Histopathology: | |
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 34 |
| Adenocarcinomas | 8 |
| Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas | 3 |
Table 2.
| Head and neck* | 16 |
| Skin and adnexae | 11 |
| Uterine cervix | 7 |
| Esophagus | 6 |
| Others[dagger] | 17 |
| Total | 57 |
The distribution by primary site of the disease is listed in Table 2. Head and neck cancer comes first, followed by cancer of the skin and adnexae. The prevailing histopathological diagnosis was squamous cell carcinoma (34 patients), followed by adenocarcinomas (8), as shown in Table 1.
The highest age of the patients at radiotherapy was 98 years [female, skin cancer, squamous cell carcinoma, died of senility with no evidence of the disease (NED) 2 years after treatment) and the longest survivor is 102 years old (female, glottic cancer, T2N0, age at radiotherapy 93 years, alive with NED for 8 years]. A 93-year-old female patient finally succumbed to her fifth cancer (the gums) 2 years 2 months after treatment, after surviving cancers of the rectum, tongue, anus and buccal mucosa. There were four other patients who had undergone treatment for malignancies previously, i.e., colon cancer in two patients, prostate cancer in one patient and lip cancer in one patient.
Comorbidity and Mental Status
The comorbidity associated with the cancers is as follows: ischemic or arrhythmic cardiac disease was found in 12 patients, hypertension in nine, cerebral vascular disease in seven, diabetes mellitus in two, chronic lung disease in two and others (Table 3). Hearing loss was noted in 10 patients; however, it did not seem to affect mental deterioration in eight patients. Other physical handicaps associated with the patients were wheelchair status (3) and bedridden status after fracture of the femur neck (1).
In addition to disorientation due to severe dementia in eight patients, the understanding of the disease and treatment by the patients was poor in nine other patients because of hearing loss, mild dementia and obstinacy (hesitancy) prior to the treatment. Most of the other patients did not consider their disease to be severe or fatal.
Radiotherapy
The strategy of RT was individually planned, depending on the stage and performance status of the patient; however, it was not modified based solely on age. The technique of radiotherapy was not altered because of age; however, in most of the patients the treatment field was intended to be limited to the primary site only and the dose per fraction and the total dose delivered were the least possible, to obtain palliation as the first aim, followed by radical cure of the local disease. A split course was effectively adopted at times, when necessary. No patient received radiotherapy as a combination with chemotherapy.
The rate of completion of treatment was 75% (43/57), if the treatment field was limited to the primary gross tumor volume only and if the cumulative dose was above 80% of the tolerable adult dose.
Specific Disease Sites
There were 16 patients with head and neck cancer, with squamous cell carcinoma in 14. The most common disease site was the oral cavity in 10 patients, followed by the pharynx in two, ethmoid sinus in one, larynx in one, thyroid in one and the parotid in one. The mucosal reaction was generally more severe than in younger adulthood, but they tolerated acute reactions fairly well. The treatment was completed in most of the patients; however, in two patients the treatment was stopped earlier in the treatment course, in one owing to her strong wish to return home and in the other owing to the motion of the patient during his treatment. Split treatment was adopted with three patients, owing to the severe mucosal reaction. For those in whom the treatment was not completed, the dose delivered ranged from 8 to 34 Gy in total. For those in whom the treatment was completed, the dose delivered ranged from 56 to 78 Gy, according to the specific tumor site. Good palliation was obtained in most of the patients as the achievement of the main aim; however, in nine patients the tumor recurred or regrew after considerable intervals. Complete response was obtained in four patients with cancer of the tongue, lower gum, soft palate and larynx. Eleven of 12 patients with head and neck cancers with PS of 0-2 completed RT, whereas two of four with PS of 3 and 4 completed RT.
Table 3.
| Comorbidity | |
| Cardiovascular | 21 |
| Cerebrovascular | 7 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 2 |
| Chronic lung disease | 2 |
| Mental status | |
| Dementia | 8 |
| Poor understanding | 9 |
The second prevailing cancer was cancer of the skin and adnexae, including hemangiosarcomas. In seven patients the skin cancer arose in the face, pinna, scalp and hand and treatment was necessary. Surgery was abandoned because of their age and radiotherapy was selected. The dose ranged from 32.5 Gy/5 fractions to 76 Gy/38 fractions with electrons. Nine out of nine patients showed complete response by external RT. The hemangiosarcoma was difficult to control, but good palliation was obtained with RT, with cessation of bleeding in two patients. Both of the patients with hemangiosarcoma died of metastatic lung disease. All the patients with cancers of the skin and adnexae, 10 with PS of 0-2 and one with PS of 3, eventually completed RT.
For the patients with uterine cervix cancer, the distribution by stage was 1B through 2B (3 patients) and 3B (4). The standard external and intracavitary radiotherapy was sufficiently completed in two patients. The doses delivered were 39.6-45 Gy by a fraction dose of 1.8 Gy by external radiotherapy and 31 Gy/4 fractions to 15 Gy/3 fractions at point A by intracavitary radiotherapy. However, four other patients received either high dose rate intracavitary (IC) radiotherapy only (owing to an outpatient basis and because of the fear of adverse reactions about which they had been informed prior to the treatment) in two (dose to point A: 20 Gy/5 fractions to 30 Gy/5 fractions), or external radiotherapy alone (because of their strong hesitancy towards IC treatment) in the other two (the dose ranged from 58.6 to 60 Gy). In one patient the reaction of the intestine was so severe that the treatment had to be abandoned at a dose of 12.6 Gy. Two of four patients with uterine cervix cancer with PS of 0-2 completed RT, whereas none of three with PS of 3 and 4 completed RT.
In many patients with cancer of the esophagus the aim of the treatment was the alleviation of dysphagia. The aim was achieved in four patients, even after the delivery of a radical dose of 55.2-70 Gy in 5-7 weeks. One patient abandoned the treatment at a dose of 41 Gy because of no response and another one with his family desired to return home because of no improvement of the symptoms after delivery of a full dose of 60 Gy. Even for the patients who completed the treatment, the median survival was 6 months and the longest 1 year 2 months. One of two patients with cancer of the esophagus with PS of 0-2 completed RT, whereas four of four with PS of 3 and 4 completed RT.
Other sites included in this survey were breast cancer in three patients, lymphomas in three, gallbladder/bile duct cancer in three, urinary bladder cancer in two and brain tumor, soft tissue sarcoma, eyelid cancer, stomach cancer, vulva cancer and bone tumor each in one patient. In most of the patients the primary aim of the treatment was the relief of persistent pain by treating the primary site. Ten of 14 patients with cancer of other sites with PS of 0-2 completed RT, whereas one of three with PS of 3 and 4 completed RT. However, in all three patients with cancer of the gallbladder/bile duct the RT dose delivered was far less than intended.
Prognostic Outcome
Follow-up of the patients could be done with most of the patients, but there were five patients for whom we could not make direct contact within 1 year, because of the movement of their family, and two others for whom the cause of death was not determined as being due to their tumor or to another cause.
Of the 42 patients with PS 0-2, 10 were alive at the time of last follow-up, 21 patients died of malignant disease or unknown cause and 11 died of intercurrent disease including senility. Of the six patients who survived more than 4 years, five have been alive and well and only one died of the tumor, 7 years after the treatment. Of 15 patients with PS 3 and 4, 13 died of malignant disease or unknown cause, whereas two died of intercurrent disease. The median survival time for 42 patients with PS 0-2 was 1 year and 10 months and that for 15 patients with PS 3 and 4 was only 6 months (Table 4).
Social Issues
Currently in Japan, the care of the elderly has been supported mainly by their families. In most of the patients an escort was invariably provided by their families, whether they were willing or not. Only one patient was admitted from a nursing home. The treatment was conducted mainly on an outpatient basis or with frequent hospital visits by their family, to adapt to the mental and physical status of the patients and familial situations. A granddaughter escorted her grandmother because the patient's son or daughter had died beforehand.
Table 4.
| ECOG PS 0-2 | 42 patients |
| Alive | 10 |
| Died of disease | 21 |
| Died of intercurrent disease | 11 |
| Median survival time | 22 months |
| ECOG PS 3,4 | 15 patients |
| Died of disease | 13 |
| Died of intercurrent disease | 2 |
| Median survival time | 6 months |
Table 5.
| Institute | No. of new patients | No. of nonagenarian patients (%) |
| A | 1300 | 6 (0.46%) |
| B | 2593 | 10 (0.39) |
| C | 1274 | 5 (0.39) |
| D | 6191 | 23 (0.37) |
| E | 2652 | 4 (0.15) |
| F | 1373 | 2 (0.15) |
| G | 4513 | 2 (0.11) |
| H | 3856 | 2 (0.05) |
| Total | 23762 | 57 (0.24) |
DISCUSSION
A total of 57 nonagenarian cancer patients, representing 0.24% of all the patients who received radiotherapy (57/23 752) at eight institutions, were studied. The rate of nonagenarians in all patients in each hospital is shown in Table 5. This shows that the rate is higher in hospitals in rural areas (hospitals A, B, D and F). This reflects the biased figure of a population of higher age in rural regions than in urban areas in Japan. This study was a multi-institutional survey and a substantial part of the patient population included here had already been reported in a detailed analysis in one hospital (D) in another journal (1).
The figures for the distribution of tumor sites and histopathology indicate that the cancers indicative for radiotherapy in the elderly occur in areas of exposure to some kind of continuous irritation. There was no nonagenarian patient with lung cancer in this survey. Prostate cancer and other cancers which are common to the elderly are not listed because they are low in incidence and radiotherapy has not been one of the primary treatment modalities for them in Japan.
The life expectancy reflected for the overall patient population in 1993 was calculated as 3.52 years, according to the Life Table for Japan, 1996, from the Department of Statistics and Information, Ministry of Health and Welfare (2). Hence in this series of patients the median survival time was slightly longer than half that expected, even with PS of 0-2.
It is well known that not the age but the PS and status of comorbidity determine the indication and selection of treatment and the prognostic outcome (3,4). The older the patients are, the more they suffer from comorbidities and the more they die of intercurrent diseases (5,6). However, despite these facts, the older patients with cancer have better health and performance status than those with diseases other than cancer. It is possible that cancer is more likely to be diagnosed in healthier elderly (7). Hence primary care physicians must not be reluctant to refer them for cancer treatment.
The PS of the patients before RT differs from patient to patient and differs in the disease sites. Deterioration of the PS is induced either by the malignant disease itself (or by the comorbidity). In patients with esophageal cancer, the PS drops easily to grade 3 or 4 in the elderly because of the lasting dysphagia and starvation. In patients with uterine cervix cancer, the elderly tend to delay in consulting a physician, because they hesitate or they mind their daughter's escort, until progression of the disease or massive bleeding. In patients with cancer of the head and neck, the PS deteriorates because of the soreness of the disease in the oral cavity or the pharynx, even in the elderly. After the RT has commenced, the patient is gradually relieved from deterioration of the PS and finally can complete the treatment with a full dose of 60 Gy or more at the primary site. Finally there is another group of patients who do not complete the RT as intended and the treatment is evaluated as palliative, when the effect is in relief of the symptoms.
In this study, we came to the conclusion that RT is feasible for the elderly, because we found that 75% of the patients who received more than 80% of the tolerable adult dose limited to the primary treatment field completed RT. Even though older patients are more likely to encounter deterioration during the course of treatment, radiotherapy is still feasible for the elderly because it is far less invasive than surgery and is a local treatment compared with systemic chemotherapy, and yields far less adverse reactions. Radiotherapy has another feature that the day-by-day treatment is accumulated until a radical cure; unless it is completed as indicated, it achieves a palliative effect matched to the already acquired dose by the patient.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Cancer Research (8-29, 10-19) from the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Japan. This study was accepted for presentation at the RSNA Meeting, 1998 (No. 1336).
H. Ikeda was responsible for the entire study, study design and data analysis, S. Ishikura for data analysis and manuscript preparation and M. Oguchi, H. Niibe, A. Yorozu, K. Nakano, N. Fuwa, S. Watanabe and T. Teshima for data acquisition.
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
This page is run by Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, as part of the OUP Journals
Comments and feedback: jnl.info{at}oup.co.uk
Last modification: 23 Aug 1999
Copyright© 1999 Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
J.-C. Horiot
Radiation Therapy and the Geriatric Oncology Patient
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 10, 2007;
25(14):
1930 - 1935.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
This Article ![]()
![]()
Abstract
![]()
Alert me when this article is cited
![]()
Alert me if a correction is posted
![]()
Services ![]()
![]()
Email this article to a friend
![]()
Similar articles in this journal
![]()
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
![]()
Similar articles in PubMed
![]()
Alert me to new issues of the journal
![]()
Add to My Personal Archive
![]()
Download to citation manager
![]()
Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
![]()
Request Permissions
![]()
Google Scholar ![]()
![]()
Articles by Ikeda, H
![]()
Articles by Teshima, T
![]()
Search for Related Content
![]()
PubMed ![]()
![]()
PubMed Citation
![]()
Articles by Ikeda, H
![]()
Articles by Teshima, T
![]()
Social Bookmarking ![]()
![]()
What's this?