Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 31:209-211 (2001)
© 2001 Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research
Pulmonary Amyloidosis Diagnosed by CT-guided Transbronchial Biopsy: a Case Report
1Endoscopy Division, 2Diagnostic Radiology Division, 3Medical Oncology Division and 4Clinical Laboratories Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo and 5Pathology Division, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
During a medical check-up, a nodular shadow was detected by chest X-ray in the right lower lung field of a 59-year-old man. On computed tomography (CT), the nodular lesion had a relatively well-defined, irregular margin. A fluoroscopy-guided bronchoscopic biopsy did not uncover any malignancy. Specimens from a subsequent CT-guided bronchoscopic biopsy revealed a pulmonary amyloid deposit. As a rule, it is difficult to exclude malignancy or confirm benign disease in cases of truly benign lesions, particularly if the lesions are difficult to biopsy. Amyloidosis is one of such conditions and requires reliable diagnostic methods to avoid unnecessary surgical resection. From our experience, we consider CT-guided bronchoscopic biopsy to be a safe and accurate procedure, even when applied to truly benign lesions.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Primary nodular amyloid lesions of the lung are uncommon and are not associated with primary systemic amyloidosis (1). There are no typical radiological findings to distinguish pulmonary amyloidosis from lung cancer, tuberculosis, silicosis, sarcoidosis and hamartoma (2,3). Moreover, the hard consistency of amyloid tissue makes it difficult to obtain biopsy specimens, which makes it difficult to diagnose amyloid lesions of the lung by transbronchial lung biopsy, percutaneous computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsy and thoracoscopic biopsy. As a result, the majority of the cases of pulmonary amyloidosis have been diagnosed only through thoracotomy (3). This report presents a case of pulmonary amyloidosis diagnosed by CT-guided transbronchial lung biopsy in which the necessity for surgical resection to deny malignancy was eliminated.
| CASE REPORT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The chest X-ray film of a 59-year-old man revealed an abnormal shadow in his right lung. There was no evidence of any other abnormality in his right lung on the X-ray films which were taken 2 years earlier. He subsequently consulted the National Cancer Center Hospital for further evaluation. His clinical presentation was unremarkable. He did not have any pulmonary symptoms of cough, sputum production or hemoptysis, nor did he have systemic symptoms such as fever, general body malaise or weight loss. His medical history was non-contributory. He had had no exposure to chemicals or asbestos.
His chest radiograph showed a 25 x 20 mm solitary nodular shadow in the right lower lung field. CT showed a 28 x 15 mm hemispherical lesion with a relatively well-defined irregular margin in the right S8a adjacent to the pleura (Fig. 1). He was referred to the hospitals Endoscopy Division for fluoroscopy-guided bronchoscopic biopsy. Brushing cytology of the lesion in S8 was performed, giving due consideration to the outpatient nature of the procedure. The specimen contained amorphous and homogeneous material that stained with light green, as well as foreign body giant cells. There was no cytological evidence of malignancy. Washing cytology was likewise negative for malignant cells. Bacterial culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)DNA analysis of the washings similarly did not reveal anything abnormal.
|
After a period of 2 months, CT-guided bronchoscopic biopsy was performed to take advantage of its highly reliable diagnostic yield and to avoid such complications as pneumothorax. The biopsy was performed using a Pentax EB-1530T2 (Asahi Optical, Tokyo, Japan) which has a 5.3 mm distal tip diameter with a 2.0 mm working channel diameter. The interventional CT system consisted of a CT and bi-plane fluoroscopes (Xvision, Toshiba Medical, Tokyo, Japan). The specific CT used permits near real-time image visualization by reconstructing six images per second with a 0.67 s delay. The bronchoscope was inserted transorally under local anesthesia (4% lidocaine). Insertion of the biopsy forceps into the lesion was difficult because of the hardness of the lesion. However, the overall procedure was successful and the tip of the forceps was clearly visualized within the lesion by high-resolution CT. Furthermore, inadvertent biopsy of the pleura was avoided by the clarity of the visualization. Two specimens were obtained, one from the center and one from the periphery of the lesion. Both biopsies were clearly confirmed by high-resolution CT. Histologically, the specimens contained acidophilic homogeneous material with a few foreign body giant cells, histiocytes and fibroblasts (Fig. 2). On further testing, the acidophilic material exhibited an orange color on Congo Red staining, apple-green birefringence and light polarization. The patients course after biopsy was uneventful. Serial chest X-rays have not demonstrated any enlargement of the lesion as of 12 months after the second biopsy.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pulmonary amyloidosis may be localized to the respiratory tract or may be part of a widespread process involving many organs. Localized pulmonary amyloidosis is defined as amyloid deposition isolated to the respiratory tract and does not include amyloidosis associated with systemic deposition (1). There are three types of localized amyloidosis: tracheobronchial, nodular parenchymal and diffuse interstitial (4). Utz et al. reported on 55 cases of pulmonary amyloidosis seen at the Mayo Clinic from 1980 to 1993. Of the 17 localized cases, seven were nodular parenchymal amyloid lesions (1). These lesions are often incidental findings on chest radiography or at autopsy (5,6). Most nodules range in size from 0.4 to 5.0 cm with an average of 3 cm (5). The lesions are difficult to diagnose, except by surgery or autopsy, as biopsy specimens are often insufficient for diagnosis in terms of both quantity and quality (3). Open thoracotomy provides optimal access for deep parenchymal lesions and permits simultaneous biopsy of other nodules. However, the course of a solitary parenchymal amyloid lesion is generally benign (7). Therefore, it is rarely necessary to resect a nodular amyloid lesion unless it is causing respiratory symptoms. However, histological diagnosis is necessary since a chest radiograph or CT scan cannot reliably differentiate an amyloid lesion from a malignant one.
The present case had normal bronchoscopy findings. Options for definitive diagnosis of the nodule included CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy and CT-guided bronchoscopic biopsy. Our hospitals experience favored the latter procedure because it provides more specimen material and is attended by fewer complications, such as pneumothorax, while maintaining a high diagnostic accuracy. This offers the advantage of avoiding an unnecessary and highly invasive surgical resection.
We routinely use CT-guided transbronchial biopsy for diagnosis of pulmonary lesions that are not recognizable on normal X-ray films but visible on CT (8,9). CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy can also be used for these lesions. However, the percutaneous approach carries greater risks of pneumothorax, hemorrhage, implantation and air embolism. A surgical approach offers the best diagnostic accuracy but remains highly invasive. Considering the actual risks of minute peripheral indeterminate nodules, including lung cancer, diagnostic methods should ideally be as minimally invasive as possible.
There are two important considerations in the selection of a biopsy method for suspected amyloid lesions. First, amyloid is difficult to harvest because of its hard consistency. Second, although one malignant cell confirms malignancy, the absence of a malignant cell cannot reliably exclude malignancy in most cases. In order to diagnose reliably the benign nature of a lesion, it is important to confirm that the biopsy specimens are indeed obtained exactly from the lesion and not from tissue surrounding the lesion. It is also important that the biopsy specimens demonstrate pathological abnormalities that are compatible with the radiographic findings, particularly the findings on high-resolution CT.
CT-guided bronchoscopic biopsy, as outlined above, clearly confirms the site of the biopsies by high-resolution CT. In the case presented, high-resolution CT permitted precise definition of biopsy sites and confirmed with high reliability the origins of the two specimens obtained, i.e. one from the center and another from the periphery of the lesion.
It was not easy to insert the biopsy forceps into the lesion because of its hard consistency. However, we were able to insert the forceps aggressively into the lesion with confidence because of the advantages offered by CT-fluoroscopy guidance and the ability to confirm the precise location of the tip of the forceps by high-resolution CT during the procedure. These advantages permitted an accurate biopsy while avoiding inadvertent biopsy of such high-risk structures as the pleura and adjacent blood vessels.
Hemorrhage after the biopsy of pulmonary parenchymal lesions is an important consideration that must always be borne in mind (10). The risk is similar to that of transthoracic approaches. Re-establishment of hemostasis in such situations is difficult or nearly impossible. With bronchoscopic biopsy, good hemostasis can be established by wedging the tip of the bronchoscope into the bronchus leading to the lesion.
Given the advantages presented, we consider CT-guided bronchoscopic biopsy to be a highly effective diagnostic procedure for benign lesions, such as pulmonary amyloidosis. The procedure makes it possible to avoid highly invasive and unnecessary surgical resections.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
+ For reprints and all correspondence: Toshiaki Kobayashi, Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 11 Tsukiji 5-chome, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 Utz JP, Swensen SJ, Gertz MA. Pulmonary amyloidosis. The Mayo Clinic experience from 1980 to 1993. Ann Intern Med 1996;124:40713.
2 Nomura S, Okamoto K, Kano T. Radiological findings of pleural amyloidosis. Rinsho Hoshasen 1991;36:5763 (in Japanese).
3 Zennami S, Niwa H, Yamakawa Y, Ichimura H, Masaoka A. Recurrence of AL type primary pulmonary amyloidosis. Kyobu Geka 1996;49:16771 (in Japanese).[Medline]
4 Fraser RG, Pare JA. Amyloidosis. In: Diagnosis of Diseases of the Chest, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders 1991;257890.
5 Hui AN, Koss MN, Hochholzer L, Wehunt WD. Amyloidosis presenting in the lower respiratory tract. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1986;110:2128.[Web of Science][Medline]
6 Thompson PJ, Citron KM. Amyloid and the lower respiratory tract. Clinical and pathologic features in a series of 21 patients. Chest 1986;90:82731.
7 Podbielski FJ, Nelson DG, Pearsall GF, Marquez GD, Connolly MM. Nodular pulmonary amyloidosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;114:28991.
8 Kobayashi T, Shimamura K, Hanai K, Kaneko M. Computed tomography-guided bronchoscopy with an ultrathin fiberscope. Diagn Ther Endosc 1996;2:22932.[Medline]
9 Kobayashi T. CT-guided bronchoscopy for minute peripheral lung cancer: from diagnosis to future therapeutic strategies. Rev Oncol 1999;1(Suppl 2):415.
10 Strange C, Heffner JE, Collins BS, Brown FM, Sahn SA. Pulmonary hemorrhage and air embolism complicating transbronchial biopsy in pulmonary amyloidosis. Chest 1987;92:3679.
Received October 23, 2000; accepted January 29, 2001.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M Pusztaszeri, E M Kamel, S Artemisia, M Genevay, and T McKee Nodular pseudotumoral pulmonary amyloidosis mimicking pulmonary carcinoma Thorax, May 1, 2005; 60(5): 440 - 440. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


