Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sato, T.
Right arrow Articles by Sugihara, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sato, T.
Right arrow Articles by Sugihara, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 33:631-635 (2003)
© 2003 Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research

Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression and its Relationship with Proliferation of Colorectal Adenomas

Takanobu Sato1, Keigo Yoshinaga3, Satoshi Okabe1, Takuya Okawa1, Tetsuro Higuchi1, Masayuki Enomoto1, Touichirou Takizawa2 and Kenichi Sugihara1,+

1 Digestive Surgery and 2 Surgical Pathology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School, Tokyo and 3 Department of Surgery, Tokyo Hospital, National Printing Bureau, Tokyo, Japan


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Acknowledgment
 REFERENCES
 
Background: Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 may be linked to carcinogenesis. In the previous study, we examined COX-2 expression immunohistochemically in 95 adenomas and reported a significant correlation between its expression and the grade of dysplasia. To clarify the correlation between COX-2 expression and cell proliferation, we investigated Ki-67 labeling index using immunohistochemistry and its correlation with COX-2 expression.

Methods: Immunohistological staining for Ki-67 antigen was performed on 95 colorectal adenomas previously reported.

Results: The Ki-67 labeling index was significantly higher in the high-COX-2 group than in the low-COX-2 and negative groups in adenomas with moderate (44.5 ± 6.4% vs 33.0 ± 2.6%, 39.0 ± 6.2%; P = 0.01, P < 0.001, respectively) or severe dysplasia (47.2 ± 7.6% vs 40.3 ± 7.2%, 35.0 ± 5.4%; P = 0.02, P = 0.005, respectively). There was no correlation between Ki-67 labeling index and COX-2 expression in mild dysplasia.

Conclusions: These results suggest that COX-2 may play a causal role in cell proliferation in carcinogenesis.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Acknowledgment
 REFERENCES
 
Considerable advancement has been made in the field of cancer prevention during the last decade. One of the most remarkable discoveries is that cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 may play a role in colorectal carcinogenesis and the blocking of COX-2 function may prevent the development of colorectal cancer. There is much evidence to suggest a link between consumption of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and colorectal cancer prevention from epidemiologic (1,2), clinical (3,4) and animal studies (5,6). Although the exact mechanism of the anti-neoplastic activity of NSAIDs remains unclear, one possible route is via inhibition of COX. COX is a key regulatory enzyme in prostaglandin biosynthesis (7). Two COX isozymes have been identified: the constitutive COX-1 and the inducible COX-2. COX-1 is constitutively expressed in normal human tissues including the colon, while COX-2 is not usually detectable in normal tissues but is induced by cytokines, growth factors, oncogenes, serum and tumor promoters (8,9).

Colorectal adenomas are considered to be precursor lesions for most colorectal cancers, representing an important target for cancer chemoprevention. Recent studies have shown that COX-2 is expressed at high levels in 80 to 90% of colorectal adenocarcinomas (1014), and selective inhibition of COX-2 reduces colorectal tumorigenesis in different models of carcinogenesis (5,15,16). Thus, COX-2 has been thought to play a crucial role in colorectal carcinogenesis.

We recently examined COX-2 expression in sporadic adenoma tissue using immunohistochemistry and its correlation with clinicopathological features and have found that COX-2 expression in adenoma cells is significantly associated with the grade of dysplasia in the adenoma. As shown in Table 1, COX-2 expression increased significantly with transition from mild dysplasia to moderate and severe dysplasia. However, it is still unclear whether COX-2 expression is related to cell proliferative activity in colorectal adenomas. To clarify the relationship between COX-2 expression and cell proliferation, we evaluated the Ki-67 labeling index (LI) and COX-2 expression in colorectal adenomas by immunohistochemistry.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Comparison of dysplasia grade and COX-2 expression
 

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Acknowledgment
 REFERENCES
 
Tissue Samples
In a retrospective review of pathologic reports, we selected colorectal adenomas >=4 mm that had been removed by polypectomy or endoscopic mucosal resection in our department between October 1999 and February 2001. Polyps associated with inflammatory bowel disease, familial polyposis coli or those having a history of NSAIDs (including low-dose aspirin) were excluded. A total of 95 polyp specimens from 78 patients were studied. All samples included in the study contained normal epithelium adjacent to the adenomatous tissue. These tumors have previously been studied for changes in COX-2 expression (17). On the basis of Morson’s criteria (18), the dysplasia of adenoma was classified into three grades: mild, moderate and severe. Severe dysplasia is synonymous with focal carcinoma in adenoma or intramucosal carcinoma.

Immunohistochemical Staining of Ki-67
Immunohistochemical staining of Ki-67 was performed on 3-µm thick sections of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sequential tissue sections to those previously stained for COX-2, in accordance with the standard procedures.

The immunohistochemical process of Ki-67 was similar to that of COX-2 (17). Slides were incubated with Ki-67 monoclonal antibody (Novocastra, Newcastle, UK) at a 1:100 dilution for 60 min at room temperature after a 10-min microwave pretreatment. The secondary antibody was biotinylated goat anti-mouse IgG (Dako, Copenhagen, Denmark). After color development with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride, the sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. Sections of colonic adenocarcinoma known to be positive for Ki-67 served as a positive control, and nonspecific mouse serum served as the negative control.

Evaluation of Immunostaining
The grades of epithelial dysplasia appear as a continuous spectrum from a mild change, which is closest to the normal epithelium, via moderate, to severe changes that are similar to those seen in invasive carcinoma. It is common to see different grades of dysplasia in one adenoma. Since the changes in the control of cell growth are both early and cumulative in carcinogenesis, determination of the proliferative activity of individual dysplastic areas of an adenoma throws light on some features of colorectal carcinoma biology. When one adenoma had different areas of dysplastic grades, separate evaluations were made for areas corresponding to adenoma with mild, moderate, or severe dysplasia according to the method previously described (19).

There are two counting methods of Ki-67 labeling in studies of colorectal neoplasms: counting cells in randomly selected fields (RS method) (20) and counting cells in the highest labeling areas (HL method) (21). There is a highly positive correlation between the RS and HL methods. We used the RS method as follows: three microscopic fields in each dysplastic area were selected randomly, and in each field 500 or more adenoma cells were counted; the ratio of Ki-67 positive cells to all counted cells was calculated, excluding cells with questionable nuclear staining. In each dysplastic area, the sum of the three fields was determined as the LI.

Statistical Analysis
Statistical significance was determined by the chi-squared, one-factor ANOVA and Fisher’s PLSD (post hoc) tests. Analysis was done by the Stat View 5.0 software package (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA). P-values <0.05 indicated statistical significance.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Acknowledgment
 REFERENCES
 
Ki-67 Labeling Index
Ki-67 immunostaining produced discernible diffuse or granular brown nuclear staining, more accentuated in the nucleoli, with a relatively uniform intensity. The Ki-67 LI increased significantly in correlation with the grade of dysplasia (P < 0.001, by one-factor ANOVA, Fig. 1). The Ki-67 LI was significantly greater in moderate than in mild dysplasia and also in severe as compared with mild dysplasia (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively, by Fisher’s PLSD tests). However, there was no significant difference in the Ki-67 LI between moderate and severe dysplasia.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Ki-67 LI in dysplastic areas of colorectal adenomas. The number and vertical bar to the right of each group indicates the mean and standard deviation of Ki-67 LI. Ki-67 LI of adenomas with moderate and severe dysplasia was higher than that of adenomas with mild dysplasia (*P < 0.001, **P < 0.001, by Fisher’s PLSD test). There was no significant difference in Ki-67 LI between adenomas with moderate and severe dysplasia.

 
Correlation between COX-2 Expression and Ki-67 Labeling Index
The Ki-67 LI for adenomas was significantly higher as indicated by COX-2 expression (P < 0.001, by one-factor ANOVA, Figures 2 and 4A, B). In severe dysplasia, the Ki-67 LI of the high COX-2 group was higher than that of the low and negative COX-2 groups, although there was no difference between the low-COX-2 and negative groups (P < 0.001, by one-factor ANOVA, Fig. 3A). In moderate dysplasia, the Ki-67 LI was also significantly higher with greater expression of COX-2 (P < 0.001, by one-factor ANOVA, Fig. 3B). In mild dysplasia, there was no correlation between Ki-67 LI and COX-2 expression (P = 0.066, by one-factor ANOVA, Fig. 3C).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Relationship between Ki-67 LI and COX-2 expression in all the adenomatous areas. Ki-67 LI progressed from the negative group to the low-COX-2 and high-COX-2 groups. (P < 0.001, by one-factor ANOVA, high-COX-2 group vs low-COX-2 group. *P < 0.001; low-COX-2 group vs negative group. **P < 0.001; high-COX-2 group vs negative group. ***P < 0.001, by Fisher’s PLSD test.)

 



View larger version (308K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 and Ki-67 expression in adenomas. (A) Adenoma cells with moderate dysplasia (closed arrow) showing stronger cytoplasmic immunostaining for COX-2 than adjacent adenoma cells with mild dysplasia (arrowhead; x50). (B) A serial section from the same tissue block. Adenoma cells with high COX-2 expression showing stronger nucleonic immunostaining for Ki-67 than adjacent adenoma cells with less COX-2 expression.

 




View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Relationship between Ki-67 LI and COX-2 expression at each dysplastic grade. (A) In severe dysplasia, Ki-67 LI of the high-COX-2 group was significantly higher than that of the low-COX-2 and negative groups (*P = 0.02, **P = 0.005, by the Fisher’s PLSD test). There was no significant difference in Ki-67 LI between the low-COX-2 and negative groups. (B) In moderate dysplasia, Ki-67 LI showed a progressive increase from the negative group to the low-COX-2 group and from low-COX-2 to high-COX-2. (P < 0.001, by one-factor ANOVA, high-COX-2 group vs low-COX-2 group *P = 0.01; low-COX-2 group vs negative group. **P = 0.04; high-COX-2 group vs negative group ***P < 0.001, by Fisher’s PLSD test.) (C) In mild dysplasia, there were no correlations between Ki-67 LI and COX-2 expression.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Acknowledgment
 REFERENCES
 
We have demonstrated that COX-2 expression is significantly higher with an advanced dysplastic change and is associated with cell proliferation activity.

Previous studies have demonstrated the importance of COX-2 in colon carcinogenesis, not only in the early stage of neoplastic evolution but also in cancer progression (5,11,15,16). Fujita et al. (22) reported that COX-2 mRNA was significantly higher in colorectal carcinomas of larger size having deeper invasions. Hasegawa et al. (23) reported that COX-2 mRNA was markedly increased in the sporadic colorectal adenomas, especially in those with larger diameters. Elder et al. (24) and Azumaya et al. (25) also reported that COX-2 expression showed a size-dependent increase in colorectal adenomas. These findings suggest an important role of COX-2 in the growth of colorectal tumors.

Our recent study (17), using immunohistochemistry in sporadic adenomas demonstrated that COX-2 expression in adenoma cells is significantly related to the grade of dysplasia. However, Einspahr et al. (26) quantitatively estimated COX-2 gene expression in 108 paraffin-embedded colorectal adenomas using real-time PCR and concluded that COX-2 expression was not related to the degree of dysplasia. The reason for this discrepancy is not clear, but could be attributed to the different methods used in these studies.

Cell proliferative activity is important for evaluating tumor growth. Monoclonal antibodies that recognize Ki-67 have shown to label all proliferating cells in G1, S, G2 and M phases of the cell cycle and are widely used to estimate the proliferative fraction of neoplasms (27,28).

We clearly demonstrated a correlation between COX-2 expression and the proliferative activity of neoplastic epithelial cells in sporadic colorectal adenomas. There are a few reports that demonstrate the relationship between COX-2 expression in colorectal adenomas and Ki-67 LI. In adenomas with severe or moderate dysplasia, the Ki-67 LI was significantly higher in the high-COX-2 group than in the low-COX-2 and negative groups. However, there was no difference in Ki-67 LI among the high-COX-2, low COX-2 and negative groups in adenomas with mild dysplasia. These results suggest that COX-2 may be related to cell proliferation of the adenoma in its progression to carcinoma. Moreover, these observations support the hypothesis that COX-2 may be involved in the growth of colorectal tumors. On the other hand, Sakuma et al. (29) have reported that colorectal carcinoma tissue overexpresses COX-2, but there is no relationship between COX-2 expression and Ki-67 labeling, suggesting that COX-2 expression may not be related to cell proliferation. This discrepancy can be possibly attributed to the different materials studied (adenoma versus carcinoma). We confirmed the relationship between COX-2 expression and cell proliferation in the progression of adenoma. However, we did not examine COX-2 and Ki-67 expression between adenoma and carcinoma in this study. It is interesting to estimate COX-2 and Ki-67 expression in the sequence from severe dysplasia via early cancer to advanced cancer. Risio and Rossini (30) reported that the Ki-67 LI progressively increased along the sequence from normal mucosa via low-grade and high-grade dysplasia adenoma to advanced cancer, whereas the Ki-67 LI of early cancer were not significantly different from that found in the low-grade dysplasia areas. The rationale for this is not clear, but it can be based on the changes occurring in the submucosal microenvironment caused by invasion.

In conclusion, these results indicate that increased COX-2 expression may be related to growth and malignant transformation of adenomas and may play an important role in the progression of colorectal adenomatous change. Hence, sporadic adenomas with upregulated COX-2 expression are potential targets for the anti-proliferative effects of NSAIDs.


    Acknowledgment
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Acknowledgment
 REFERENCES
 
This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Sciences, Sports and Culture of Japan.


    FOOTNOTES
 
+ For reprints and all correspondence: Takanobu Sato, Department of Surgery, Kyoundo Hospital, Sasaki Institute, 1–8 Kanda Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-0062, Japan. E-mail: sato{at}po.kyoundo.jp Back


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Acknowledgment
 REFERENCES
 
1 Thun MJ, Namboodiri MM, Heath CW Jr. Aspirin use and reduced risk of fatal colon cancer. N Engl J Med 1991;325:1593–6.[Abstract]

2 Giovannucci E, Egan KM, Hunter DJ, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC, et al. Aspirin and the risk of colorectal cancer in women. N Engl J Med 1995;333:609–14.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3 Giardiello FM, Hamilton SR, Krush AJ, Piantadosi S, Hylind LM, Celano P, et al. Treatment of colonic and rectal adenomas with sulindac in familial adenomatous polyposis. N Engl J Med 1993; 328(18):1313–6.

4 Labayle D, Fischer D, Vielh P, Drouhin F, Pariente A, Bories C, et al. Sulindac causes regression of rectal polyps in familial adenomatous polyposis. Gastroenterology 1991;101:635–9.[Web of Science][Medline]

5 Oshima M, Dinchuk JE, Kargman SL, Oshima H, Hancock B, Kwong E, et al. Suppression of intestinal polyposis in Apc{Delta}716 knockout mice by inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). Cell 1996;87:803–9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

6 Hull MA, Booth JK, Tisbury A, Scott N, Bonifer C, Markham AF, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2 is up-regulated and localized to macrophages in the intestine of Min mice. Br J Cancer 1999;79:1399–405.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

7 Williams CS, DuBois RN. Prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase: why two isoforms? Am J Physiol 1996;270:G393–400.[Web of Science][Medline]

8 DuBois RN, Awad J, Morrow J, Roberts LJ II, Bishop PR. Regulation of eicosanoid production and mitogenesis in rat intestinal epithelial cells by transforming growth factor-alpha and phorbol ester. J Clin Invest 1994;93:493–8.[Web of Science][Medline]

9 Jones DA, Carlton DP, McIntyre TM, Zimmerman GA, Prescott SM. Molecular cloning of human prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase type II and demonstration of expression in response to cytokines. J Biol Chem 1993;268:9049–54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10 Sano H, Kawahito Y, Wilder RL, Hashiramoto A, Mukai S, Asai K, et al. Expression of cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 in human colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 1995;55:3785–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11 Eberhart CE, Coffey RJ, Radhika A, Giardiello FM, Ferrenbach S, DuBois RN. Up-regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 gene expression in human colorectal adenomas and adenocarcinomas. Gastroenterology 1994;107:1183–8.[Web of Science][Medline]

12 Kargman SL, O’Neill GP, Vickers PJ, Evans JF, Mancini JA, Jothy S. Expression of prostaglandin G/H synthase-1 and –2 protein in human colon cancer. Cancer Res 1995;55:2556–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13 Maekawa M, Sugano K, Sano H, Miyazaki S, Ushiama M, Fujita S, et al. Increased expression of cyclooxygenase-2 to -1 in human colorectal cancers and adenomas, but not in hyperplastic polyps. Jpn J Clin Oncol 1998;28:421–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14 Sheehan KM, Sheahan K, O’Donoghue DP, MacSweeney F, Conroy RM, Fitzgerald DJ, et al. The relationship between cyclooxygenase-2 expression and colorectal cancer. JAMA 1999;282:1254–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15 Reddy BS, Rao CV, Seibert K. Evaluation of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor for potential chemopreventive properties in colon carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 1996;56:4566–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16 Kawamori T, Rao CV, Seibert K, Reddy BS. Chemopreventive activity of celecoxib, a specific cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, against colon carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 1998;58:409–12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17 Sato T, Yoshinaga K, Okabe S, Okawa T, Enomoto M, Takizawa T, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in colorectal adenomas. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:786–92.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

18 Morson BC, Konishi F. Dysplasia in the colorectum. In: Wright R, ed. Recent advances in gastrointestinal pathology. London: WB Saunders 1980:331–43.

19 Li A, Goto M, Horinouchi M, Tanaka S, Imai K, Kim YS, et al. Expression of MUC1 and MUC2 mucins and relationship with cell proliferative activity in human colorectal neoplasia. Pathol Int 2001;51:853–60.[CrossRef][Medline]

20 Suzuki H, Matsumoto K, Terabe M. Ki-67 antibody labeling index in colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Gastroenterol 1992;15:317–20.[Medline]

21 Johnston PG, O’Brien MJ, Dervan PA, Carney DN. Immunohistochemical analysis of cell kinetic parameters in colonic adenocarcinomas, adenomas and normal mucosa. Hum Pathol 1989;20:696–700.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

22 Fujita T, Matsui M, Takaku K, Uetake H, Ichikawa W, Taketo MM, et al. Size-and invasion-dependent increase in cyclooxygenase 2 levels in human colorectal carcinomas. Cancer Res 1998;58:4823–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23 Hasegawa K, Ichikawa W, Fujita T, Ohno R, Okusa T, Yoshinaga K, et al. Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) mRNA in human colorectal adenomas. Eur J Cancer 2001;37:1469–74.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

24 Elder DJ, Baker JA, Banu NA, Moorghen M, Paraskeva C. Human colorectal adenomas demonstrate a size-dependent increase in epithelial cyclooxygenase-2 expression. J Pathol 2002;198:428–34.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

25 Azumaya M, Kobayashi M, Ajioka Y, Honma T, Suzuki Y, Takeuchi M, et al. Size-dependent expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in sporadic colorectal adenomas relative to adenomas in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Pathol Int 2002;52:272–6.[Medline]

26 Einspahr JG, Krouse RS, Yochim JM, Danenberg PV, Danenberg KD, Bhattacharyya AK, et al. Association between Cyclooxygenase expression and colorectal adenoma characteristics. Cancer Res 2003;63:3891–3.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27 Gerdes J, Schwab U, Lemke H, Stein H. Production of a mouse monoclonal antibody reactive with a human nuclear antigen associated with cell proliferation. Int J Cancer 1983;31:13–20.[Web of Science][Medline]

28 Key G, Becker MH, Baron B, Duchrow M, Schluter C, Flad HD, et al. New Ki-67-equivalent murine monoclonal antibodies (MIB 1–3) generated against bacterially expressed parts of the Ki-67 cDNA containing three 62 base pair repetitive elements encoding for the Ki-67 epitope. Lab Invest 1993;68:629–36.[Web of Science][Medline]

29 Sakuma K, Fujimori T, Hirabayashi K, Terano A. Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 immunoreactivity and relationship to p53 and Ki-67 expression in colorectal cancer. J Gastroenterol 1999;34:189–94.[CrossRef][Medline]

30 Risio M, Rossini FP. Cell proliferation in colorectal adenomas containing invasive carcinoma. Anticancer Res 1993;13:43–7.[Web of Science][Medline]

Received October 17, 2003; accepted October 26, 2003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. V. Grau, J. A. Baron, E. L. Barry, R. S. Sandler, R. W. Haile, J. S. Mandel, and B. F. Cole
Interaction of Calcium Supplementation and Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and the Risk of Colorectal Adenomas
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2005; 14(10): 2353 - 2358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sato, T.
Right arrow Articles by Sugihara, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sato, T.
Right arrow Articles by Sugihara, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?