Skip Navigation


Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology Advance Access originally published online on October 4, 2006
Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 2006 36(11):681-687; doi:10.1093/jjco/hyl099
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/11/681    most recent
hyl099v2
hyl099v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Urashima, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Honda, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Urashima, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Honda, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© 2006 Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research

Long-term Functional Outcome of Brachytherapy for Carcinoma of the Mobile Tongue: Focus on the Atrophic Change of Irradiated Tongue

Yusuke Urashima1,, Katsumasa Nakamura1, Yoshiyuki Shioyama1, Tomonari Sasaki1, Saiji Ohga1, Takashi Toba1, Naonobu Kunitake2, Tooru Chikui3, Toshiyuki Kawazu3, Tomomi Yamada4, Hiromi Terashima5 and Hiroshi Honda1

1 Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka
2 Department of Clinical Radiology, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka
3 Department of Oral Maxillofascial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Kyushu University, Fukuoka
4 Department of Medical Information Science, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka
5 Department of Radiologic Technology, School of Health Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

For reprints and all correspondence: Yusuke Urashima, Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan. E-mail: urash{at}radiol.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp

Received May 2, 2006; accepted July 8, 2006


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
OBJECTIVE: To assess tongue atrophy and long-term functional outcome of mobile tongue cancer patients after interstitial radiotherapy.

METHODS: Of 493 patients whose squamous cell carcinoma of the mobile tongue had been treated with low dose rate brachytherapy, there were 57 patients evaluated between July 2002 and April 2004 whose tongue had not been modified by surgical procedures and who had no primary recurrence. The median time from treatment to evaluation was 96 months (range: 9–214 months). Almost all of the patients belonged to the early stage tongue cancer (T1/T2/T3/T4=30:24:3:0), and all had received interstitial radiotherapy with a single-plane implant. To evaluate the deformity of the tongue, we used a grading system that classified the atrophic changes of the tongue into four categories (G0–G3).

RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients (70%) showed mild tongue hemiatrophy (G1 or G2) in the irradiated side. However, no patients showed severe atrophy where the tongue cannot be made to protrude beyond the incisors (G3). The length of time after brachytherapy was >72 months and the age of the patients at brachytherapy had the same statistical significance (P=0.0366). As for functional outcome, understandability of speech and a normal diet were preserved for almost all patients.

CONCLUSION: The progression of atrophic change in the irradiated tongue occurred over a long term after brachytherapy. However, most patients could maintain their activities of daily life without severe restriction.

Key Words: tongue cancer • brachytherapy • tongue atrophy • functional outcome • QOL


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Brachytherapy has played an important role in the treatment of oral tongue carcinoma not only because of its good outcome but because it preserves the structure and function of the tongue. Although many investigators have supported these advantages of brachytherapy (16), some reports documented its severe complications, such as osteoradionecrosis, soft tissue necrosis and ulceration. In addition, tongue hemiatrophy after brachytherapy is considered relatively common (7,8). However, only a few reports have studied the relationship between the objective evaluation of tongue atrophy and the function of the tongue (8).

In this study, we investigated tongue atrophy and functional outcome in patients with tongue cancer after brachytherapy, particularly in patients who were followed up for a long period. In addition, we examined the factors influencing the degree of atrophic change of the irradiated tongue.


    PATIENTS AND METHODS
 TOP
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Patient Characteristics and Selection
From 1978 to 2003, 493 patients with tongue cancer were treated with low dose rate brachytherapy at the Department of Radiology of Kyushu University Hospital. To examine the effect of brachytherapy on tongue atrophy, the following eligibility criteria were used in this study: (a) brachytherapy performed with or without external radiotherapy; (b) no modification to the tongue by surgical procedures such as partial resection or excision; (d) no cervical lymph node or distant metastasis present at the time of initial radiotherapy; (e) no primary recurrence.

Of the 493 patients, we evaluated 57 patients between July 2002 and April 2004, who visited our out patient clinic and met all of the criteria. The median time from treatment to evaluation was 96 months (range: 9–214 months). There were 23 men and 34 women. Their median age was 57 (range: 22–84 years) at initial treatment. Histologically, all cases were squamous cell carcinoma. The UICC TNM classification of 2002 identified 30 patients as T1, 24 as T2 and three as T3.

Treatment
Interstitial radiotherapy was performed with radium-226 needles in 28 patients, cesium-137 needles in 23 patients and iridium-192 hairpins in six patients. Radiation doses were delivered by the implantation of radioactive sources and doses reached 70 Gy/week, according to the Paterson–Parker dosage system. All the patients were treated with single-plane implants.

Of the 57 patients, 11 received external radiotherapy prior to interstitial radiotherapy. External radiotherapy was given with megavoltage (4–6 MV) irradiation from a linear accelerator. The primary tumor and the upper neck were treated with two upper opposite parallel portals. These fields were treated with a dose of 1.5–2 Gy/fraction/day, 5 days/week, to a median total dose of 30 Gy (range: 10–30.4 Gy). The dose of interstitial radiotherapy was not modified except for one patient whose dose was reduced to 50 Gy because of marked shrinkage of the tumor after external irradiation.

Chemotherapy was combined with radiotherapy in 25 patients, of whom 19 were treated with a 5-fluorouracil-based regimen, four with bleomycin alone and two with cisplatin and tegafur uracil.

The only late complications of brachytherapy were bone exposure in seven patients and ulceration in 11 patients.

Among the 57 patients, 13 received radical neck dissection because of their cervical failure.

Grading of the Tongue Atrophy
To evaluate the tongue deformities, we used the grading system proposed by Yoshioka et al. (8). This system, the details of which are shown in Fig. 1, classifies the atrophic changes of the tongue into four categories (G0–G3).


Figure 0991
View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Examples of each grade of tongue atrophy according to the grading system: G0, hemiatrophy is not observed either in the protruding position or in the resting position; G1, the tip does not show its deviation in the resting position but deviates to the irradiated side in the protruding position; G2, hemiatrophy of the irradiated side is observed both in the resting position and in the protruding position, but the patient is able to protrude the tongue beyond the incisors; G3, the patient is not able to protrude the tongue beyond the incisors because of tongue hemiatrophy. In this study, the patient presented as G3 was excluded because she had received partial glossectomy.

 
Evaluation of Functional Outcome
Functional outcome was evaluated based on the patient's ability to eat a regular diet and the understandability of his or her speech. All 57 patients in this study were interviewed by the authors of this study with the use of a questionnaire based on a performance status scale for head and neck cancer patients (Table 1) (9).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Performance status scale for head and neck cancer patients

 
Statistical Methods
To investigate several factors that may have influenced tongue atrophy, we compared the G0 group (n=17) and the G1–2 group (n=40). The {chi}2 test was used to compare subgroups that were divided according to the existence or nonexistence of tongue atrophy. In addition, prognostic variables for the existence of tongue atrophy were tested for independent significance by stepwise logistic regression analysis.

In addition, Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to analyse the relationship between the grade of tongue atrophy and factors.

The statistical software program StatView, version 5.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) and SAS release 8.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) were used for the statistical analyses.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Tongue Atrophy Grading Results
In the grading of the tongue atrophy, 18 patients were classified as G0, 20 as G1 and 19 as G2. No patients were classified as G3.

Figure 2 shows the relationship between the grade of tongue atrophy and the length of time after brachytherapy. Although G2 atrophy was seen even within 10 months after brachytherapy in one patient, the atrophic change in the irradiated tongue tended to progress over the long term after brachytherapy. According to Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, there was a statistically significant relationship between the grade of tongue atrophy and the length of time after brachytherapy (P=0.0110, {rho}=0.334).


Figure 0992
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. Distribution of the patients of each grade of tongue atrophy related to the length of time after brachytherapy.

 
Figure 3 shows the relationship between the grade of tongue atrophy and the age of the patients at brachytherapy. This analysis showed that the risk of tongue atrophy tended to increase in younger patients. According to the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, there was also statistical significant relationship between the grade of tongue atrophy and the age of the patients at brachytherapy (P=0.0337, {rho}=–0.284).


Figure 0993
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3. Distribution of the patients of each grade of tongue atrophy related to the age of the patients at brachytherapy.

 
As for the result of {chi}2 test, differences were found in the age of the patients at brachytherapy (P=0.0387), in the existence of neck dissection (P=0.0471) and in the length of time after treatment (P=0.0243) (Table 2). Multivariate analysis also showed that the length of the time after brachytherapy was ≥72 months and the age of the patients at brachytherapy had the same statistical significance (P=0.0366) (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Chi-square test for risk factors relating to atrophy of the tongue

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Stepwise logistic regression analysis with the existence of tongue atrophy as a dependent variable

 
Results of Evaluation of Functional Outcome
Table 4 shows the functional outcomes according to tongue atrophy. Almost all of the patients preserved the understandability of their speech and the normalcy of their diet. Full marks were given to 56 patients (98%) for speech understandability and to 53 patients (93%) for dietary normalcy. Of the five patients who scored less than 80 points in normalcy of diet, four scored 50 points because of a loss of teeth with aging and one patient scored 70 points because of a tongue deformity after radiation-induced ulceration.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Breakdown of functional outcome scores, by the grade of tongue atrophy

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
It has generally been accepted that brachytherapy for the treatment of early tongue cancer is an excellent means of achieving local control (16). Although many articles have investigated the control rate of tongue cancer, surprisingly few have referred to long-term tongue atrophy and functional outcome of radiation for mobile tongue.

A few reports referred to tongue atrophy (7,8,10,11). Among them, Yoshioka et al. documented that tongue atrophy occurred in 71% of patients and severe atrophy was seen in only one patient, based on a survey of 49 mobile tongue cancer patients treated with low dose rate or high dose rate brachytherapy (8). In our study, tongue atrophy occurred in 39 (70%) of 57 patients, so the rate of tongue atrophy was almost identical to theirs.

Regarding other head and neck malignancies with external radiotherapy, Wu et al. showed that the rate of tongue atrophy was 54.8%, after a mean follow-up period of 8.5 years (2–20 years), among 31 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma who had been treated with external radiotherapy (10). Puthawala et al. studied 70 patients with cancer at the base of the tongue after they had been treated with primary radiotherapy, and also reported two cases of tongue atrophy as a complication after radiation (11). According to their report, unilateral tongue atrophy was observed in two patients, 2 and 3 years after treatment.

Considering those reports, it is evident that atrophy of the tongue occurs after radiotherapy. However, there are few papers on the relationship between the degree of tongue atrophy and the length of time after treatment. As shown in Fig. 2, the longer the follow-up period was, the higher the grade of tongue atrophy seemed to become. In addition, the length of time after treatment was a significant factor influencing the degree of atrophic change of the irradiated tongue in our study. Therefore, we believe that the degree of tongue atrophy tended to correlate with the length of time after brachytherapy.

The mechanism of tongue atrophy may resemble the process of muscle injury after radiotherapy. Animal research on the effects of radiation on muscle has focused on the histopathologic features of acute myositis and late muscle atrophy (12,13). Some authors studied cytokines in injured muscle, as well as the late proliferation of fibroblasts and the synthesis of matrix proteins, after radiotherapy (14,15). In humans, late muscle injury evolves over several years after fractionated external beam radiotherapy and, on the basis of animal study findings, is most likely a result of the gradual loss of vascular supply (16). These data support the clinical evidence of the relationship that our study has found between the degree of tongue atrophy and the length of time after treatment.

Another reason for tongue atrophy may be hypoglossal nerve injury leading to tongue atrophy. King et al. studied 12 nasopharyngeal cancer patients and described the appearance of the tongue following radiation-induced neuropathy of the hypoglossal nerve (17). In our study, the doses of external radiotherapy were no more than 30 Gy, not enough to cause cranial nerve atrophy according to previously published reports (18,19) (62.5–100 Gy, 6000–8000 R). However, in almost all cases, the minimum tumor dose of brachytherapy reached as high as 70 Gy. Therefore, it was possible that the implanted radioactive sources directly caused hypoglossal denervation.

Another factor that could influence the hypoglossal nerve is hypoglossal paralysis, which has been reported as a complication of radical neck dissection (20,21). In our study, 13 patients received radical neck dissection for their cervical failure. The possibility can not completely be excluded that radical neck dissection injured the hypoglossal nerve in those 13 patients. However, as shown Table 3, the statistical analysis showed no significant relation between the existence of tongue atrophy and the existence of neck dissection. According to the published report, the frequency of unintentional injury to the nerves has been reported to be less than 5% (21).

As for the relationship between the grade of tongue atrophy and the age of the patients at brachytherapy, the result of this study showed that the risk of tongue atrophy tended to increase in younger patients. Although there was no data about the volume of the tongue in our study, it was probable that the radiation-induced tongue atrophy varied depending on the amount of the muscle of the tongue. As for the age-related atrophy of the tongue, Bässler studied autopsy materials of 170 tongues and reported that an age-related progressive increase of fatty tissue occurred with atrophy of the muscle fibers in the musculature of the tongue (22).

As for complication history, 18 of the 57 patients had tongue ulcer or bone exposure. In this study, the statistical analysis showed no significant relation between history of complication and grade of atrophy. However, severe tongue ulcer may be a cause of tongue deformity. Further investigation should be made to reveal the relationship between these factors and the events.

As for tumors themselves as an influencing factor, almost all patients in this study belonged to T1 or T2 and all the tongue tumors were thin enough to be treated with single-plane implantation. These tumor characteristics might be a reason why the T-category did not appear to influence tongue atrophy in this study. Yoshioka et al. reported that the T-category tended to increase with the tongue atrophy grade, but they found no statistical significance between grade of tongue atrophy and T-category (8).

The functional outcome for the patients was assessed with a questionnaire using a validated performance scale for head and neck cancer patients developed by List et al. (9). This scale, which has been used in many studies (2327), seems to be specific for head and neck cancer patients, and it can discriminate between different levels of functioning. Although some patients did not score highly because of a loss of teeth with aging, most patients maintained good scores in this study.

The aim of the present study was to investigate tongue atrophy and functional outcome in patients with tongue cancer after brachytherapy, particularly in those who were followed up for a long period. As a result, the number of the analysed patients was 57 out of 496 patients who were treated with brachytherapy in our institute. Further investigation is certainly required in order to avoid possible bias.

In conclusion, atrophic change of the irradiated tongue tended to progress over the long term after brachytherapy and the risk of tongue atrophy tended to increase in younger patients.

These issues should be kept in mind in the treatment of tongue cancer patients, but the influence of tongue atrophy may be so subtle that most the patients can maintain their activities of daily life without severe restrictions.


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
1 Mazeron JJ, Crook JM, Marinello G, Walop W, Pierguin B. (1990) Prognostic factors of local outcome for T1, T2 carcinomas of oral tongue treated by iridium 192 implantation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 19 281–5.[Web of Science][Medline]

2 Decroix Y and Ghossein NA. (1981) Experience of the Curie Institute in the treatment of cancer of the mobile tongue. I. Treatment policies and result. Cancer 47 496–502.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

3 Wang CC. (1989) Radiotherapeutic management and results of T1N0, T2N0 carcinoma of the tongue. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 17 287–91.[Web of Science][Medline]

4 Horiuchi J, Okuyama T, Shibuya H, Takeda M. (1982) Results of brachytherapy for cancer of the tongue with special emphasis on local prognosis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 8 829–35.[Web of Science][Medline]

5 Leung TW, Lee AWM, Chan DKK. (1993) Definitive radiotherapy for carcinoma of the oral tongue. Acta Oncol 32 559–64.[Web of Science][Medline]

6 Hareyama M, Nishio M, Saito A, et al. (1993) Results of cesium needle interstitial implantation for carcinoma of the oral tongue. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 25 29–34.[Web of Science][Medline]

7 Larson DL, Lindberg RD, Lane E, Goepferdt H. (1983) Major complications of radiotherapy in cancer of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Am J Surg 146 531–6.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

8 Yoshioka Y, Yoshida K, Shimizutani K, Furukawa S, Inoue T, Teshima T, et al. (2001) Proposal of a new grading system for evaluation of tongue hemiatrophy as a late effect of brachytherapy for oral tongue cancer. Radiother Oncol 61 87–92.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

9 List MA, Ritter-Sterr C, Lansky SB. (1990) A performance status scale for head and neck cancer patients. Cancer 66 564–9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

10 Wu CH, Hsiao TY, Ko JY, Hsu MM. (2000) Dysphagia after radiotherapy: endoscopic examination of swallowing in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 109 320–5.[Web of Science][Medline]

11 Puthawala AA, Syed AMN, Eads DL, Gillin L, Gates TC. (1988) Limited external beam and interstitial 192iridium irradiation in the treatment of carcinoma of the base of the tongue: A ten year experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 14 839–48.[Web of Science][Medline]

12 Hsu HY, Chai CY, Lee MS. (1998) Radiation-induced muscle damage in rats after fractionated high-dose irradiatio. Radiat Res 149 482–86.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

13 Powers BE, Gillette EL, Gillette SL, LeCouter RA, Withrow SJ. (1991) Muscle injury following experimental intraoperative irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 20 463–71.[Web of Science][Medline]

14 Martin M, Lefaix JL, Pinton P, Crechet F, Daburon F. (1993) Temporal moduration of TGF-beta 1 and beta-actin gene expression in pig skin and muscular fibrosis after ionizing radiation. Radiat Res 134 63–70.[Web of Science][Medline]

15 Wegrowski J, Lefaix JL, Lafuma C. (1992) Accumulation of glycosamynoglycans in radiation induced muscular fibrosis. Int J Radiat Biol 61 685–93.[Web of Science][Medline]

16 Bentzen SM, Thames HD, Overgaard M. (1989) Latent-time estimation for late cutaneus and subcutaneous radiation reactions in a single follow-up clinical study. Radiother Oncol 15 267–74.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

17 King AD, Ahuja A, Leung SF, Chan YL, Lam WWM, Metreweli C. (1999) MR features of the denervated tongue in radiation induced neuropathy. Br J Radiol 72 349–53.[Abstract]

18 Berger PS and Bataini JP. (1977) Radiation-induced cranial nerve palsy. Cancer 40 152–155.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

19 Cheng VST and Schulz MD. (1975) Unilateral hypoglossal nerve atrophy as a late complication of radiation therapy of head and neck carcinoma: a report of four cases and a review of the literature on peripheral and cranial nerve damages after radiation therapy. Cancer 35 1537–44.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

20 Million RR, Cassisi NJ, Manscuso AA, Stringer SP, Mendenhall WM, Parsons JT. (1994) Management of the neck for squamous cell carcinoma. In Million RR and Cassisi NJ (Eds.). Management of Head and Neck Cancer: A Multidisciplinary Approach 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA Lippincott pp. 75–142.

21 Murakami R, Baba Y, Nishimura R, Baba T, Okuda T, Utsunomiya D, et al. (1998) MR of denerved tongue: temporal changes after radical neck dissection. Am J Neuroradiol 19 515–8.[Abstract]

22 Bässler R. (1987) Histopathology of different types of atrophy of the human tongue. Path Res Pract 182 87–97.

23 Zelefsky MJ, Gaynor J, Kraus D, Strong EW, Shah JP, Harrison LB. (1996) Long-term subjective functional outcome of surgery plus postoperative radiotherapy for advanced stage oral cavity and oropharyngeal carcinoma. Am J Surg 171 258–62.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

24 Harrison LB, Zelefsky MJ, Armstrong JG, Carper L, Gaynor JJ, Sessions RB. (1994) Performance status after treatment for squamous cell cancer of the base of the tongue—a comparison of primary radiation therapy versus primary surgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 30 953–7.[Web of Science][Medline]

25 Horwitz EM, Frazier AJ, Martinez AA, Keidan RD, Clarke DH, Lacerna MD, et al. (1996) Excellent functional outcome in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the base of tongue treated with external irradiation and interstitial iodine 125 boost. Cancer 78 948–57.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

26 Moore GJ, Parsons JT, Mendenhall WM. (1996) Quality of life outcomes after brachytherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the base of tongue. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 36 351–4.[Web of Science][Medline]

27 Harrison LB, Zelefsky MJ, Pfister DG, Carper E, Raben A, Kraus DH, et al. (1997) Detailed quality of life assessment in patients treated with primary radiotherapy for squamous cell cancer of the base of the tongue. Head Neck 19 169–75.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
Y ARIJI, N FUWA, T KODAIRA, H TACHIBANA, T NAKAMURA, Y SATOH, and E ARIJI
False-positive positron emission tomography appearance with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose after definitive radiotherapy for cancer of the mobile tongue
Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2009; 82(973): e3 - e7.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/11/681    most recent
hyl099v2
hyl099v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Urashima, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Honda, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Urashima, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Honda, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?