Skip Navigation

Corrigendum for Rastogi et al., Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 35 (10) 572-579.
Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 2006 36(2):121; doi:10.1093/jjco/hyi210
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rastogi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bhatt, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rastogi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bhatt, M. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© 2006 Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research


Corrigenda

Mitomycin and Fluorouracil in Combination with Concomitant Radiotherapy: A Potentially Curable Approach for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Madhup Rastogi1, Madhu Srivastava1, Kundan S. Chufal2, M. C. Pant1, Kriti Srivastava1 and Madanlal B. Bhatt1

1 Department of Radiotherapy, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh and 2 Department of Oncology, Batra Hospital and Medical Research Center, New Delhi, India

The above article appeared in Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 35(10): 572–579 (2005). The authors would like to report that there was an error while reporting locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS) at 3 years in this article. Reported LRFS is 89.2% with mean LRFS time of 38.2 months (95% CI 36.8, 39.5) and median LRFS time not reached. The correct LRFS is 63.1% at 3 years with mean LRFS time of 32.2 months (95% CI 29.1, 35.3) and median LRFS time not reached. The corresponding survival curve for LRFS (Figure 2) is correct.

The parts of the manuscript where these errors were printed are given below with the correct values indicated.

Page 1. Abstract: Results, line 3: 89.8 should be 63.1.

Page 5. Results, lines 3 and 4: 89.8% should be 63.1%; 38.2 months should be 32.2 months; CI should be 29.1–35.3.

Table 5. Fourth column, first and second rows: 89.8 should be 63.1; 38.2 (36.8, 39.5) should be 32.2 (29.1, 35.3).

Table 7: Fifth column, last row: 89.8 should be 63.1.

The authors would like to apologise for these errors and would like to point out that the changes will not have any impact on the basic concept of the manuscript nor any effect on the message that is being conveyed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rastogi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bhatt, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rastogi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bhatt, M. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?