Skip Navigation


Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology Advance Access originally published online on June 8, 2006
Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 2006 36(6):351-356; doi:10.1093/jjco/hyl028
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/6/351    most recent
hyl028v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suzuki, E.
Right arrow Articles by Fujii, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suzuki, E.
Right arrow Articles by Fujii, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© 2006 Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research

Expression and Mutation Statuses of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Thymic Epithelial Tumors

Eriko Suzuki, Hidefumi Sasaki, Osamu Kawano, Katsuhiko Endo, Hiroshi Haneda, Haruhiro Yukiue, Yoshihiro Kobayashi, Motoki Yano and Yoshitaka Fujii

Department of Surgery II, Nagoya City University Medical School, Nagoya, Japan

For reprints and all correspondence: Hidefumi Sasaki, Department of Surgery II, Nagoya City University Medical School, Kawasumi 1, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan. E-mail: hisasaki{at}med.nagoya-cu.ac.jp

Received February 6, 2006; accepted March 23, 2006


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations have been reported to correlate with the sensitivity to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment for advanced lung cancers. Since several reports have shown that invasive thymoma overexpress the EGFR protein, we examined the EGFR expression and mutation statuses in thymoma and thymic carcinoma tissues.

Methods: EGFR mutation statuses from 99 thymic epithelial tumor samples were evaluated by a rapid and sensitive TaqMan assay using Applied Biosysytems 7500 real-time PCR system. Probes were designed according to the 13 different EGFR mutations reported previously in lung cancers. A total of 38 thymoma samples were directly sequenced for the EGFR gene. Protein expressions were evaluated for 56 thymic epithelial tumors by immunohistochemistry.

Results: EGFR gene mutations were not detected in any of the thymoma and thymic cancer samples using TaqMan PCR assay. Of the 38 samples 3 showed a heterozygous silent mutation without changes in the protein, a G to A transition at the nucleotide 2361 in exon 18. EGFR expression was significantly higher in invasive thymomas (stages III–IV, 15/19 were positive) than in early stage thymomas (stages I–II, 7/33 were positive) (P < 0.0001). All four carcinomas and all seven B3 thymomas showed EGFR positive staining.

Conclusions: Although EGFR mutation at the tyrosine kinase domain is unlikely to be a therapeutic target for thymoma, the information about EGFR expression would contribute to the further identification of the therapeutic target for advanced thymomas.

Key Words: EGFR • thymic cancer • thymoma • mutation


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Thymoma is one of the common neoplasms in the anterior mediastinum. Thymoma usually grows slowly when it is at early stages. In these patients, long-term survival is common. On the other hand, many studies have demonstrated worse prognosis for patients with invasive thymomas (14). As complete resection is often impossible for advanced-stage thymoma, multimodal treatment is necessary (36). However, consensus has not been achieved for the multidisciplinary treatment for the advanced thymoma. On the other hand, molecular target therapy is one of the most promising fields for cancer treatment. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a 170 kDa transmembrane glycoprotein with tyrosine kinase domain. EGFR gene or protein is overexpressed in many malignancies (79). Since EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor was approved as a third-line therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, phase II and phase III trials have been underway for many other cancers. Recently, we and others demonstrated EGFR gene mutations around the ATP binding pocket of the tyrosine kinase domain in NSCLC patients. These EGFR gene mutations have been reported to correlate with the sensitivity to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment for advanced NSCLC (1012). Several reports have shown overexpression of EGFR protein in invasive thymomas by immunohistochemistry (1316). We have also found elevated levels of EGFR in serum specimens from patients with advanced-stage thymomas (17). More recently, gene amplification of EGFR has been reported to correlate with clinical stage of thymoma (18). However, there have not been studies that explored EGFR gene mutations in clinical thymoma specimens. In the present study, we examined the EGFR mutation status in thymoma and thymic carcinoma tissues by the Applied Biosysytems 7500 Real Time PCR system. This TaqMan PCR assay is a rapid and sensitive method for the detection of EGFR mutations with high throughput (19,20). Probes were designed according to the 13 different EGFR mutations reported previously in NSCLC (1012). Several samples were directly sequenced for the EGFR gene. EGFR protein expression was evaluated by imminohistochemical analysis.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
PATIENTS
Primary thymic tumor samples were obtained from 99 patients who had undergone operation at the Department of Surgery II, Nagoya City University Medical School, between 1993 and 2003. Patient's age ranged from 20 to 81 years (mean: 55.0 years). There were 48 females and 51 males. Clinical staging was based on Masaoka's staging system (1) and histological classification on WHO thymic epithelial tumor classification (21). The distribution of patients was as follows: stage I in 33, stage II in 19, stage III in 11, stage IVa in 14, stage IVb in 6, thymic cancer in 8 and unknown 8. And by WHO classification, none was in type A, 28 in type AB, 11 in type B, 21 in type B2, 8 in type B3, 8 in type C and 23 unknown (Table 1). Among 99 patients, 10 were treated with neoadjuvant (9 treated with steroid-plus and 1 treated with chemotherapy) and 3 were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. The study was reviewed by the Institutional Review Broad and written consent was obtained from all the patients.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. The distribution of patients according to the Masaoka clinical stating system and World Health Organization histological classification

 
GENOTYPING BY TAQMAN PCR ASSAY
We extracted genomic DNA from 99 frozen thymic epithelial tumor samples by the protocol of the kit (Wizard® SV Genomic DNA Purification System: Promega), and then performed TaqMan PCR assay using the Applied Biosystmes 7500 Real Time PCR System. The primers and ABI PRISM TaqMan MGB probes were designed with Primer Express 2.0 software (Applied Biosystems). The sequence of the allele-specific probes and the primer used in the TaqMan PCR assay are shown in Table 2. PCR cycling conditions were as follows: 1 cycle at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 s and 58°C for 1 min. The results were analyzed on Applied Biosystems 7500 Real Time PCR system using alleic discrimination assay program.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Sequence of the mutation specific TaqMan probes and PCR primers

 
DIRECT SEQUENCING FOR EGFR
Total RNA was extracted from 38 thymoma tissues using the Isogen kit (Nippon gene, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturers' instructions. RNA concentration was determined using a spectrophotometer and adjusted to a concentration of 200 ng/ml. RNA (1 µg) was reverse transcribed by Superscript II enzyme (Gibco BRL, Gaithersburg, MD) with 0.5 µg oligo (dT)12–16 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Inc. Piscataway, NJ). The reaction mixture was incubated at 42°C for 50 min and then at 72°C for 15 min. We then used 1 µl of each DNA for PCR analyses. The PCRs were performed using the LA-Taq kit (Takara Bio Inc, Shiga, Japan) in a 25 µl reaction volume. The primer sequences for the EGFR gene for kinase domain (exon 18–21) were as follows: the forward primer, 5'-CTCTTACACCCAGTGGAGAA-3' and the reverse primer, 5'-CATCCACTTGATAGGCACTT -3' (572 bp). The cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94°C for 40 s, 60°C for 40 s and 72°C for 45 s. The products were purified using the Qiagen PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Amplified cDNAs were separated on 1% agarose gels, and the bands were visualized by ethidium bromide and photographed under ultraviolet transillumination. These samples were sequenced by ABI prism 3100 analyzer (Applied Biosystems Japan Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and analyzed by BLAST and chromatograms by manual review.

IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY
Mouse monoclonal antibody against EGFR (clone EGFR.113) was purchased from Novocastra Laboratorie Ltd. (Newcastle, United Kingdom). From paraffin tissue blocks from thymic epithelial tumors 4 µm sections were made. The slides were treated with xylenes and then dehydrated in alcohol. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked with 0.3% H2O2. For antigen retrieval, tissue sections were boiled in a stainless steel pressure cooker for 5 min in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0). After blocking with Block Ace Solution (Dako Japan Co., Kyoto, Japan), the slides were incubated with the monoclonal antibody against EGFR at 1: 20 dilutions for overnight at 4°C. The Envision-plus Kit and 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB) substrate were used to visualize the antibody binding, and the sections were counterstained with hematoxin. More than 10% staining was considered as positive staining.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
TAQMAN PCR ASSAY FOR DETECTION OF THE EGFR GENE MUTATION
We used allelic discrimination assay using the Applied Biosystems 7500 Real Time PCR system to detect whether the sample DNA contained any of the 13 reported EGFR mutations. Each of the 13 probes has been show to anneal only to the correct sequence. EGFR gene mutations were not detected in any of the 99 thymoma or thymic cancer samples (Fig. 1).


Figure 1
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Allelic discrimination assay. Common mutations in NSCLC, G719S (serine for glycine at codon 719 within exon18), L858R (leucine to arginine of 858) Del 1a(in-frame deletion: 2235–2239) and Del 4(in-frame deletion: 2240–2257) are shown.

 
DIRECT SEQUENCING OF THE EGFR GENE
We next sequenced the cDNA from 38 thymoma for the EGFR gene. Of the 38 samples 3 showed a heterozygous silent mutation without change in the protein, a G to A transition at the nucleotide 2361 in exon 18. Three patients were as follows: case one; an 81-year-old man with stage III thymoma, case two; a 56-year-old man with stage I thymoma, case three; a 53-year-old woman with stage I thymoma. We could not identify any clinical characteristics that can identify the three cases (Fig. 2). No other EGFR mutations were found.


Figure 2
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Direct sequencing of the EGFR gene in thymoma samples. All three panels show a heterozygous silent mutation, a G to A transition at the nucleotide 2361(arrows). (A) an 81-year-old man with stage III thymoma, (B) a 56-year-old man with stage I, type B3 thymoma, (C) a 53-year-old woman.

 
EGFR PROTEIN EXPRESSION
Immunohistochemical (IHC) approach was used to study the relative amount of EGFR protein expression in 56 thymic epithelial tumors. In 26 of 56 tumors, more than 10% of tumor cells were stained positive for EGFR (Fig. 3). Frequency of EGFR positive tumors according to the stages of thymomas were stage I, 3/19; stage II, 4/14; stage III, 5/8; and stage IV, 10/11. EGFR expression was significantly higher in invasive thymomas (stage III–IV, 15/19 were positive) than in early stage thymomas (stage I–II, 7/33 were positive) (P < 0.0001). Frequency of EGFR positive sections according to the WHO classification of thymic epithelial tumors were AB, 4/22; B1, 1/7; B2, 8/14; B3, 7/7; others, 2/2; and C, 4/4. All four carcinomas and all seven B3 thymomas were EGFR positive.


Figure 3
View larger version (167K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. EGFR protein expression by immunohistochemistry. Right; EGFR positive section (WHO; type B3, stage IV thymoma). Left; EGFR negative section (WHO; type B1, stage I thymoma).

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
In the present study, we were unable to detect any EGFR missense mutations in thymoma specimens from Japanese patients. Kosaka et al. (22) demonstrated that 40% of Japanese NSCLC patients had EGFR mutations, a ratio which was significantly higher than the EGFR mutation ratio from Caucasian NSCLC patients (1012). Many studies have demonstrated that the EGFR mutation ratio was higher in female NSCLC patients (11,12,22). Although, 48.5% (48/99) were females in our analysis, there was no EGFR mutation found from their thymoma specimens. Lee et al. reported that they found only 1 EGFR mutation out of 93 breast carcinoma tissues, but no EGFR mutation was detected in the other 536 samples, including 98 colon, 185 gastric and 73 hepatocellular carcinomas (23). These data suggest that the EGFR kinase domain very rarely mutates in common human cancers other than NSCLC.

Our data showed that invasive thymoma (stage III and IV) had higher EGFR expressions by immunohistochemistry, in agreement with previous reports (1316). If thymoma is completely encapsulated (Masaoka stage I) or has only macroscopic invasion into surrounding fatty tissue (stage II), surgical resection is the first choice treatment. In such cases, recurrence incidence is low, for example 3% with stage I and 13% with stage II (24). But for invasive thymoma, local recurrence has been observed in 27% with stage III and 54% with stage IV (24). Therefore additional therapy might be necessary. Radiotherapy, chemotherapy (46,25), steroid-pulse treatment (26) and so on are usually advocated. However, there is no general consensus for improving the prognosis other than total resection of thymoma, as reviewed by Henja et al. (27) on nonsurgical management of thymoma. Thus we tried to probe the treatment using tyrosine kinase antagonists which looks promising in other neoplasia (28).

Many studies have indicated that invasive thymoma has high ratio of EGFR protein expression by immunohistochemistry (1416), whereas EGFR expression was not detected in control thymuses (14). Diana et al. (18) indicated that invasive and advanced-stage thymoma had higher EGFR gene amplification. Currently, EGFR gene mutations are detected in NSCLC patients, and those with EGFR mutation show a good clinical response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (gefitinib or erlotinib). If EGFR mutations were detected in thymoma, these tyrosine kinase inhibitors would be added to adjuvant therapy. But we could not find any EGFR missense mutations with TaqMan PCR assay and direct sequencing in any of the thymic tumors we studied.

If the correlation between EGFR expression and thymoma, and the mechanism, is clarified as to what brings about the EGFR expression, EGFR inhibitor may be added to new adjuvant therapy. Although EGFR mutation at tyrosine kinase domain is unlikely to be a therapeutic target for thymoma, the information about EGFR expression would contribute to further development of therapy for advanced thymomas. Cetuximab might be one of the candidates for the treatment of advanced thymomas with increased EGFR expression. Although published preclinical reports suggest that EGFR expression might be needed for cetuximab activity (29,30), recent clinical evidence indicates that response to cetuximab treatment is independent of the relative degree of EGFR expression level in tumors (31).


    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by the AstraZeneca Research Grant 2004.


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
1 Masaoka A, Monden Y, Nakahara K, Tanioka T. Follow-up study of thymomas with special reference to their clinical stages. Cancer 1981;48: 2485–92.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

2 Kondo K, Monden Y. Therapy for Thymic Epithelial Tumors: A Clinical Study of 1320 Patients From Japan. Ann Thoracic Surg 2003;76:878–85[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3 Sonobe M, Nakagawa M, Ichinose M, Ikegami N, Nagasawa M, Sindo T. Thymoma. analysis of prognostic factors. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;49:35–41.[Medline]

4 Ogawa K, Uno T, Toita T, Onishi H, Yoshida H, Kakinohara Y, et al. Postoperative Radiotherapy for patients with completely resected thymoma. Cancer 2002;94:1405–13.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

5 Venuta F, Rendina EA, Pescarmona EO, De Giacomo T, Vegna ML, Fazi P, et al. Multimodality treatment of thymoma: a prospective study. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64: 1585–92.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6 Shin DM, Walsh GL, Komaki R, Putnam JB, Nesbitt J, Ro JY, et al. A multidisciplinary approach to therapy for unresectable malignant thymoma. Ann Intern Med 1998;129:100–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7 Rikimaru K, Tadokoro K, Yamamoto T, Enomoto S, Tsuchida N. Gene amplification and overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Head and Neck 1992;14:8–13.

8 Mayer A, Takimoto M, Fritz E, Schellander G, Kofler K, Ludwig H. The prognostic significance of proliferating cell nuclear antigen, epidermal growth factor receptor, and mdr gene expression in colorectal cancer. Cancer 1993;71:2454–60.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

9 Klijn JG, Berns PM, Schmitz PI, Foekens JA. The clinical significance of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) in human breast cancer: a review on 5232 patients. Endocr Rev 1992;13:3–17.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10 Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, Gurubhagavatula S, Okimoto RA, Brannigan BW, et al. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2129–39.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11 Paez JG, Jänne PA, Lee JC, Tracy S, Greulich H, Gabriel S, et al. EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science 2004;304:1497–500.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12 Pao W, Miller V, Zakowski M, Doherty J, Politi K, Sarkaris I, et al. EGF receptor gene mutations are common in lung cancers from ‘never smokers’ and are associate with sensitivity of tumor to gefitinib and erlotinib. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:13306–11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13 Hayashi Y, Ishii N, Obayashi C, Jinnai K, Haniok K, Imai Y, et al. Thymoma:tumour type related to expression of epidermal growth factor (EGF), EGF-receptor, p53, v–erb B and ras p21. Virchows Arch 1995;426:43–50.[Web of Science][Medline]

14 Gilhus NE, Jones M, Turley H, Gatter KC, Nagvekar N, Newsom-Davis J, et al. Oncogene proteins and proliferation antigens in thymomas: increased expression of epidermal growth factor receptor and Ki67 antigen. J Clin Pathol 1995;48:447–55.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15 Pescarmona E, Pisacane A, Pignatelli E, Baroni CD. Expression of epidermal and nerve growth factor receptors in human thymus and thymomas. Histopathology 1993;23:39–44.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

16 Henley JD, Koukoulis GK, Loehrer PJ Sr. Epidermal growth factor receptor expression in invasive thymoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2002;128:167–170.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

17 Sasaki H, Yukiue H, Sekimura A, Mizuno K, Konishi A, Fukai I, et al. Elevated serum epidermal growth factor receptor level in stage IV thymoma. Surg Today 2004;34:167–70.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

18 Ionescu DN, Sasatomi E, Cieply K, Nola M, Dacic S. Protein expression and gene amplification of epidermal growth factor receptor in thymomas. Cancer 2005;103:630–6.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

19 Shi MM, Bleavins MR, de la iglesia FA. Technologies for detecting genetic polymorphisms in pharmacogenomics. Mol Diagn 1999;4:343–51.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

20 Robledo R, Beggs W, Bender P. A simple and cost-effective method for rapid genotyping of insertion/deletion polymorphisms. Genomic 2003;82:580–2.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

21 Rosai J. The World Health Organization histological typing of tumours of the thymus. 2nd edn. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1999:9–13.

22 Kosaka T, Yatabe Y, Endo H, Kuwano H, Takahashi T, Mitsudomi T. Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene in lung cancer: biological and clinical implications. Cancer Res 2004;64:8919–23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23 Lee JW, Soung YH, Kim SY, Park WS, Nam SW, Lee JY, et al. Absence of EGFR mutation in the kinase domain in common human cancer besides non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Cancer 2005;113:510–1.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

24 Monden Y, Nakahara K, Iioka S, Nanjo S, Ohno K, Fujii Y Hashiomoto J, et al. Recurrence of thymoma: clinicopathological features, therapy and prognosis. Ann Thorac Surg 1985;39:165–9.[Abstract]

25 Macchiarin P, Chella A, Ducci F, Ross B, Testi C, Bevilacqu G. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy surgery, and postoperative radiation therapy for invasive thymoma. Cancer 1991;68:706–13.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

26 Tateyama H, Takahashi E, Saito Y, Fukai I, Fujii Y, Niwa H, et al. Histopathologic changes of thymoma preoperatively treated with corticosteroids. Virchows Arch 2001;438:238–47.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

27 Heneley JD, Cummings OW, Loehrer PJ Sr. Tyrosine kinase receptor expression in thymomas. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2004;130:222–4.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

28 Hejna M, Haberl I, Raderer M. Nonsurgical management of malignant thymoma. Cancer 1999;85:1871–84.[Web of Science][Medline]

29 Sato JD, Kawano T, Le AD, Mendelsohn J, Polikoff J, Sato GH. Biological effects in vitro of monoclonal antibodies to human epidermal growth factor receptors. Mol Biol Med 1983;1:511–29.[Medline]

30 Goldenberg A, Masui H, Divgi C, Kamrath H, Pentlo K, Mendelsohn J. Imaging of human tumor genografts with an indium-111-labeled anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody. J Natl Cancer Inst 1989;81:1616–25.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31 Saltz LB, Meropol NJ, Loehrer PJ Sr, Needle MN, Kopit J, Mayer RJ. Phase II trial of cetuximab in patients with refractor colorectal cancer that expresses the epidermal growth factor receptor. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:1201–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
N. Girard, R. Shen, T. Guo, M. F. Zakowski, A. Heguy, G. J. Riely, J. Huang, C. Lau, A. E. Lash, M. Ladanyi, et al.
Comprehensive Genomic Analysis Reveals Clinically Relevant Molecular Distinctions between Thymic Carcinomas and Thymomas
Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2009; 15(22): 6790 - 6799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/6/351    most recent
hyl028v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suzuki, E.
Right arrow Articles by Fujii, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suzuki, E.
Right arrow Articles by Fujii, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?