Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology Advance Access originally published online on June 27, 2006
Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 2006 36(8):523-526; doi:10.1093/jjco/hyl057
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2006 Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research
Case Report |
Different Responses to Gefitinib in Lung Adenocarcinoma Coexpressing Mutant- and Wild-Type Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Genes
1 Departments of Hematology-Oncology, 4 First Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, 2 Division of Molecular and Genomic Medicine, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli and 3 Department of Hematology-Oncology, Pahai Hospital, Yilan, Taiwan, ROC
For all reprints and all correspondence: John Wen-Cheng Chang, 155 Tung Hwa North Road, Taipei 105, Taiwan, ROC. E-mail: wen1902{at}hotmail.com
Received March 20, 2006; accepted April 17, 2006
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Response to gefitinib is strongly associated with the status of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene. Here we report the different treatment responses in a case of lung adenocarcinoma coexpressing mutant-type gene in the primary lung mass and a wild-type gene in the metastatic bone lesions. This case demonstrated that at least two strains of tumor cells were present in a single patient. This may be one of the mechanisms of gefitinib resistance.
Key Words: lung cancer (diagnosis & staging, translational oncology gene profiling, translational oncology signal transduction, EGFR mutation)
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mutation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase domain leads to autophosphorylation of tyrosine kinase, which in turn activates the intracellular signal transduction cascades, mainly mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK pathway), phosphoinositol 3 kinase (PI3K-AKT pathway) and STAT pathway (1). Gefitinib (AstraZeneCa Inc, UK) selectively binds to ATP-binding site of EGFR, thus inhibiting autophosphorylation of tyrosine kinase. Lynch et al. have shown consistent gene mutations of exons 1821 in the gefitinib responders, while no mutation existed in the non-responders (2). Paez et al. (3) confirmed the same EGFR-mutation points with Lynch study at the same time.
We previously (4) showed that mutation rate is much higher (55%) in Chinese patients with lung adenocarcinoma than that in Western patients (610%) (5). The positive predicting rate of treatment response was 87% and the negative predicting rate was 75%. Subsequent reports from Italy (5) and Korea (6) confirmed the high predictive value of EGFR mutation and clinical response of gefitinib. The most common mutations were exon 19 deletion (LREA) and exon 21 point mutation (L858R).
Why do mutations in the EGFR tyrosine kinase domain predict for the responsiveness to gefitinib? There may be at least two potential explanations. The first is that mutation may result in conformational changes near the ATP-binding site; which is also the site of gefitinib binding (2). A second theory proposed by Settleman et al. suggested that mutation receptors preferentially signal through anti-apoptotic pathways including AKT and STAT pathway. Blocking mutant EGFR leads to rapid apoptosis of tumor cells (7).
Here we report the differential responses to gefitinib in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma coexpressing mutant-type EGFR gene in the primary lung mass and a wild-type gene in the metastatic bone lesions.
| CASE REPORT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A 59-year-old non-smoker female presented with a 2 month history of low back pain and weight loss on 22 November 2001. Physical examination disclosed multiple tender points at lumbar spines, thoracic spines, bilateral sacro-iliac joints, right humeral head and rib cage. Hemogram showed mild normocytic anemia. Biochemical tests showed normal transaminase, creatinine and calcium levels; carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) = 414 ng/ml. Chest X-ray showed a 2 cm left upper lung mass. Chest computed tomography (CT) revealed a 2 cm mass (Fig. 1a). Bone scan disclosed multiple bone metastases. CT-guided biopsy on 28 November 2001 of the lung mass disclosed an adenocarcinoma. She received systemic chemotherapy with 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine on days 1, 8 and 15 plus 80 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 15 every 28 days following lumbar spine irradiation. Because of the radiation dermatitis (recall phenomenon), gemcitabine was temporarily substituted by vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 in the 2nd cycle. After 3 cycles of chemotherapy, her disease progressed in both lungs and bones. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) disclosed cervical (C)-2, -3, -6 vertebral body signal enhancement as well as C-2, -6 dural sac and cord compressions by the metastatic lesions (Fig. 2a). She underwent laminectomy and vertebroplasty for the C-spine metastases on 5 February 2002. Pathological examination of the C-spine specimen disclosed metastatic adenocarcinoma. CEA increased progressively to 940 ng/ml on 22 July 2002. She was subsequently treated with gefitinib 250 mg QD on 10 August 2002 according to a protocol approved by the institutional review board of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Taiwan. Chest CT scan evaluation of the response 3 months following gefitinib treatment showed a >30% reduction of the diameter of the lung mass (Fig. 1b). CEA decreased to 109 ng/ml in a month. The lung mass has regressed by >30% in length. However, her bone pain did not improve. MRI of the C-spine showed new signal-enhanced lesions (Fig. 2b). The lung mass disappeared completely following further gefitinib treatment. Unfortunately, her bone metastases progressed. This patient expired 13 months after gefitinib treatment.
|
|
For mutational analysis of the kinase domain of EGFR-coding sequence, we analyzed the lung specimen obtained during diagnostic procedures and bone specimen obtained at the time when she underwent C-spine surgery. Tissue sections were obtained and stained with hematoxylin and eosin first to examine the tumor proportion of the tissue. Only the tumor portion was dissected from the unstained tissue section slides and sent for DNA extraction performed with DEXPAT reagent (Takara Biomedical, Japan) following the instruction of the manufacture. The tyrosine kinase domain of EGFR-coding sequence, exons 18, 19, 20 and 21 were amplified with four pairs of primers specific to the flanking sequences of individual exons and PCR amplificons were subjected to direct sequencing (the PCR primers and amplification procedures). Forward and reverse sequencing reactions were performed using the same primers for PCR amplification and ABI BigDye Terminator kit v3.1 (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) according to manufacturer's instructions. Sequencing reactions were electrophoresed on an ABI3700 genetic analyzer. Sequence variations were determined by using Seqscape software (Applied Biosystems) with the EGFR reference sequence (NM_005228 [GenBank] .3, NCBI). All sequence variations were confirmed by multiple independent PCR amplifications and repeated sequencing reactions. This patient achieved a complete response to gefitinib treatment in the lung mass expressing A839T mutation (Fig. 3). The C-spine metastasis expressing wild-type EGFR did not respond to gefitinib treatment.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Gefitinib as second-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after cisplatin-based regimen failure leads to 8.819.0% clinical response, with median survival of 68 months (8,9). Erlotinib also achieved 912.3% response rate and 6.78.4 months median survival in the same setting (10,11). These were more effective and less toxic than Docetaxel monotherapy as shown in historical comparisons (12). Unfortunately, combination of either gefitinib or erlotinib with chemotherapy, compared with chemotherapy alone, did not improve either response rate or overall survival as first line therapy for advanced NSCLC (1316). Clinical practice with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in NSCLC observes around 1015% of patients achieve remarkable clinical benefit with dramatic shrinkage of tumor and improvement of quality of life. Several trials had concluded that non-smokers, women, histological type with adenocarcinoma and patients of Asian heritage have a better outcome with EGFR TKI treatment (9,17,18). Overexpression of EGFR by immunohistochemical staining did not predict clinical response (19).
Lynch et al. (2) amplify EGFR 28 exons in nine TKI-sensitive NSCLC specimens. They found consistent gene mutations of exons 1821 in the TKI responders, while no mutation was observed in non-responders. Approximately 8090% of EGFR mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain are exon 19 deletion or exon 21 missense mutations. All EGFR mutations occur around the ATP-binding domain, leading to higher affinity TKI binding than the wild-type EGFR. He also reported that EGFR mutations were observed predominantly in adenocarcinoma histological type, non-smoker, female gender and East Asian patients. Paez et al. (3) confirmed the same EGFR-mutation points with Lynch study at the same time. EGFR mutations have the highest incidence in East Asian patients with adenocarcinoma histological type, with around 57% incidence compared with <10% incidence in Caucasians.
The patterns of EGFR mutation show a striking correlation with anti-tumor response to gefitinib. Lung adenocarcinoma with substitution mutation of L858R and deletion within codons 746753 of EGFR are particularly sensitive to gefitinib treatment (2,3). These sequence alterations cluster around the active site of the EGFR kinase (activation loop and glycine-rich P loop), which is important for autoregulation in protein kinase (20). Patients with EGFR mutations other than L858R and 746753 deletion had also been reported responsive to gefitinib (4).
The position of A839 is in the activation loop of EGFR tyrosine kinase, which is located between L836 and T845 (21). Although there were no biological studies of A839T mutation cell lines with regard to gefitinib treatment, we demonstrated the anti-tumor responsiveness to gefitinib in the lung tumor specimen bearing A839T in this case report. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report showing such new mutation in the gefitinib responder. The conformational change in the GEFR-TK domain of A839T mutation may explain gefitinib responsiveness in this case.
Marchett et al. (5) examined 375 lung adenocarcinoma specimens for EGFR and k-ras mutation. He observed all of the 39 specimens with EGFR mutation did not have k-ras mutation, while two-third of 339 patients without EGFR mutation expressed k-ras mutation. He concluded EGFR mutation and k-ras mutations are mutually exclusive. Baselga et al. (22) presented a hypothesis that some carcinogens such as those that result from smoking lead to carcinogenesis by activating AKT pathway via k-ras mutation, while other carcinogens stimulate carcinogenesis via MAPK and STAT pathway by inducing EGFR mutation.
Pao et al. (23) showed that in two out of five patients with acquired resistance to gefitinib or erlotinib, progressing tumors contain, in addition to a primary drug-sensitive mutation in EGFR, a secondary mutation in exon 20, which leads to substitution of methionine for threonine at position 790 (T790M) in the kinase domain.
Kobayashi et al. (24) reported the case of a patient possessing EGFR mutation with gefitinib-responsive, advanced NSCLC who had a relapse after 2 years of complete remission during treatment with gefitinib. The DNA sequence of the EGFR gene in his tumor biopsy specimen at relapse revealed the presence of a second point mutation, resulting in the same mutation of EGFR as Pao's report. Structural modeling and biochemical studies showed that this second mutation led to gefitinib resistance.
We demonstrated that both mutant- and wild-type EGFRs were present in a patient with adenocarcinoma. It disclosed heterogeneity of the tumor cells. Because of the ability of self-activating the intracellular signal transduction cascades, the EGFR-mutation cells may be the predominant cells before TKI therapy. When the tumor cells bearing mutant EGFR underwent apoptosis soon after TKI therapy, the wild-type tumor cells became the predominant strain. This may be one of the mechanisms of TKI resistance.
We conclude that the TKI did work for the mutant EGFR tumor as was demonstrated in the primary lung tumor of this case and the resistance of TKI was caused by the heterogeneity of the tumor cells. In patients with NSCLC expressing EGFR mutations, it is reasonable to give TKI as the main therapy. Further trial of combination therapies of TKI with other therapeutic modalities to overcome the heterogeneity of tumor cells is warranted.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 Pinkas-Kramarski R, Soussan L, Waterman H, Levkowitz G, Alroy I, Klapper L, et al. Diversification of Neu differentiation factor and epidermal growth factor signaling by combinatorial receptor interactions. EMBO J 1996;15:245267.[Web of Science][Medline]
2 Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, Gurubhagavatula S, Okimoto RA, Brannigan BW, et al. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of nonsmall-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med 2004;350:212939.
3 Paez JG, Janne PA, Lee JC, Tracy S, Greulich H, Gabriel S, et al. EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science (Wash DC) 304:1497500, 2004.
4 Huang SF, Liu HP, Li LH, Ku YC, Fu YN, Tsai HY, et al. High Frequency of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations with complex patterns in non-small cell lung cancers related to gefitinib responsiveness in Taiwan. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:8195203.
5 Marchetti A, Martella C, Felicioni L, Barassi F, Salvatore S, Chella A, et al. EGFR mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer: analysis of a large series of cases and development of a rapid and sensitive method for diagnostic screening with potential implications on pharmacologic treatment. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:85786.
6 Han SW, Kim TY, Hwang PG, Jeong S, Kim J, Choi IS, et al. Predictive and prognostic impact of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib. J Clin Oncol 2005:23:2493501.
7 Raffaella Sordella, Daphne W. Bell, Daniel A. Haber, Jeffrey Settleman. Gefitinib-sensitizing EGFR mutations in lung cancer activate anti-apoptotic pathways. Science 2004;305:11637.
8 Fukuoka M, Yano S, Giaccone G, et al. Multi-institutional randomized phase II trial of gefitinib for previously treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:223746.
9 Kris MG, Natale RB, Herbst RS, Lynch TJ Jr, Prager D, Belani CP, et al. Efficacy of gefitinib, an inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in symptomatic patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 2003;90:214958.
10 Perez-Soler R, Chachoua A, Huberman M, Karp D, Rigas J, Hammond L, et al. Finals results of a Phase II study of erlotinib (Tarceva) monotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer following failure of platinum-based chemotherapy (abstract P-611). Lung Cancer, 2003;41(Suppl. 2): S246.
11 Shepherd F, Pereira J, Ciuleanu E, Tan EH, Hirsh V, Thongprasert S, et al. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer following failure of 1st line or 2nd line chemotherapy. A National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) trial. Proc ASCO, 2004 (abstract number 7022).
12 Shepherd FA. Second-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2003;3:43542.[CrossRef][Medline]
13 Giaccone G, Herbst RS, Maneglod C, Scagliotti G, Rosell R, Miller V, et al. Gefitinib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. A phase III trial -INTACT 1. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:77784.
14 Herbst ER, Giaccone G, Schiller JH, Natale RB, Miller V, Mangold C, et al. Gefitinib in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. A phase III trial -INTACT 2. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:78594.
15 Gatzemeier U, Pluzanska A, Szczesna A, Kaukel E, Roubec J, Brennscheidt U, et al. Results of a phase III trial of Erlotinib combined with cisplatin and gemcitabine chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Proc ASCO, 2004 (abstract number 7010).
16 Herbst RS, Prager D, Hermann R, Miller V, Fehrenbacher L, Hoffmann P, et al. A phase III trial of erlotinib combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Proc ASCO, 2004 (abstract number 7011).
17 Miller VA, Kris MG, Shah N, Patel J, Azzoli C, Gomez J, et al. Bronchioloalveolar pathologic subtype and smoking history predict sensitivity to gefitinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:11039.
18 Janne PA, Gurubhagavatula S, Yeap BY, Lucca J, Ostler P, Skarin AT, et al. Outcomes of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with gefitinib (ZD1839, "Iressa") on an expanded access study. Lung Cancer 2004;44:22130.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
19 Bailey R, Kris M, Wolf M, Kay A, Averbuch S, Askaa J, et al. Gefitinib (Iressa,ZD1839) monotherapy for pretreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer in IDEAL 1 and 2: tumor response is not clinically relevantly predictable from tumor EGFR membrane staining alone. Lung Cancer 2003;41(Suppl. 2): S71.
20 Huse M, Kuriyan J. The conformational plasticity of protein kinases. Cell 2002;109:275.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
21 Stamos J, Sliwkowski MX, Eigenbrot C. Structure of the epidermal growth factor receptor kinase domain alone and in complex with a 4-anilinoquinazoline inhibitor. J. Biol Chem 2002;277:46265.
22 Baselga J, Arteaga CL. Critical update and emerging trends in epidermal growth factor receptor targeting in Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:244559.
23 Pao W, Miller VA, Politi1 KA, Riely GJ, Somwar1 R, Zakowski MF, et al. Acquired Resistance of Lung Adenocarcinomas to Gefitinib or Erlotinib Is Associated with a Second Mutation in the EGFR Kinase Domain. PLoS Medicine 2005;2:e73.
24 Susumu,K, Titus BJ, Tajhal D, Pasi AJ, Olivier K, Matthew M, et al. Brief Report: EGFR Mutation and Resistance of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer to Gefitinib. NEJM 2005;352:78692.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


