Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology Advance Access originally published online on November 30, 2007
Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 2007 37(12):969-972; doi:10.1093/jjco/hym130
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2007 Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research
Successful Treatment of Primary Plasma Cell Leukaemia by Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation from Haploidentical Sibling
1 Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Fukuoka, Japan
2 Center for Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
3 Department of Hematology, National Fukuoka-Higashi Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
For reprints and all correspondence: Atsushi Nonami, First Department of Internal Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan; E-mail: anonamin{at}yahoo.co.jp
Received July 25, 2007; accepted September 2, 2007
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Primary plasma cell leukaemia (PCL) is a rare, aggressive neoplasm of plasma cell dyscrasia. Conventional chemotherapy is usually ineffective, with an overall survival of only 8 months. Here, we describe a 42-year-old man with primary PCL, who was successfully treated with haploidentical (2-HLA loci mismatched) haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). To overcome the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) disparity, in vivo T-cell purging by the pre-transplant administration of antithymocyte globulin followed by a conventional prophylactic treatment against graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) resulted in an avoidance of severe GVHD as well as infectious complications. The patient has maintained complete remission for 13 months after haploidentical HSCT, indicating that a graft-versus-PCL effect might be preserved. Haploidentical HSCT can be a potentially curative treatment for patients with primary PCL who do not have an HLA-identical donor.
Key Words: plasma cell leukaemia haploidentical stem cell transplantation ATG
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Primary plasma cell leukaemia (PCL) is a very rare, aggressive variant of multiple myeloma (MM) accounting for 2–3% of all plasma cell dyscrasias (1). It is defined as malignant proliferation first diagnosed in the leukaemic phase without preceding MM. Patients with this entity usually have clinical presentations in advanced stages and multiple organ insufficiency due to the involvement of PCL at greater levels than MM. They then usually have a fulminant course and poor prognosis (1–4).
Treatment with standard alkylating agents and steroids is poorly effective (median survival 2 months) (5,6), although a combination of chemotherapy such as VAD chemotherapy, M-80 protocol or hyper-CVAD regimen might has provided slight better but not yet promising results (4,7). Recently, several preliminarily reports have demonstrated that high-dose chemotherapy followed by allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) resulted in the sustained long-term survival of eligible patients (8), suggesting the possible effect of graft-versus-PCL as shown for MM (9,10). In this report, we describe the first case of a chemotherapy-resistant primary PCL, which was successfully treated with allogeneic HSCT from a haploidentical (2-HLA loci mismatched) sibling donor. In vivo T-cell depletion by antithymocyte globulin (ATG) contained in the conditioning regimen might avoid the development of severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), whereas a graft-versus-PCL effect still might be preserved (11) in this case. Considering the aggressive nature of this disease, haploidentical HSCT can be a treatment option based on graft-versus-PCL effects in addition to intensive conditioning regimens for patients with primary PCL who do not have an HLA-identical donor.
| CASE REPORT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A 42-year-old man was referred to our hospital because of leukocytosis and acute renal failure in May 2006. On admission, he manifested high fever and severe diarrhoea; however, spleen, liver and lymph nodes were not palpable. Endoscopic colonoscopy and histological findings of colon revealed a mild chronic inflammation. Haemoglobin concentration was 15.5 g/dl, the platelet count 103 x 109/l and the white blood cell (WBC) count 53.3 x 109/l with 55% abnormal cells. The serum level of total protein was 8.0 g/dl, and the serum level of creatinine and blood urea nitrogen increased up to 8.71 mg/dl and 84 mg/dl, respectively. The serum level of IgG, M, A, D and E was 2244 mg/dl, 1411 mg/dl, 550 mg/dl, 2.5 mg/dl and 1135 IU/ml, respectively. A bone marrow aspirate was hypercellular with 54% abnormal plasma cells, which were positive for IgM, CD138, CD19, CD30, CD35 and CD38, but negative for CD20, CD34 and CD56. Bone marrow smear showed abnormal plasma cells with classical eccentric nuclei, prominent paranuclear hof and abundant basophilic cytoplasm. Cytogenetic analysis of bone marrow showed normal in all metaphase cells. Radiological studies such as computed tomography and scintigraphy demonstrated that the patient had no extramedually masses and bone lesion. Serum and urinary protein electrophoresis revealed no monoclonal protein, indicating that these myeloma cells were categorized as non-secretary type. On the basis of these findings, a diagnosis of primary PCL was made. Acute renal failure was considered due to both dehydration and PCL. The patient was also found to be positive for hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen and envelope antigen, and his serum HBV-DNA level was 3.8 log of the genome equivalent per millilitre. Therefore, he was also diagnosed as an HBV carrier.
On the day of admission, the patient received a VAD regimen consisting of vincristine 0.4 mg and doxorubicin 10 mg/m2 on days 1–4, and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1–4 and 13–16. Concurrently, to prevent the reactivation of HBV, treatment with lamivudine (100 mg daily) was started. Diarrhoea and high fever were gradually improved and resolved by day 10. On day 14, WBC count and serum creatinine level returned to normal levels. However, on day 17, the patient developed high fever again, and WBC count increased to 13.12 x 109/l with 24% of leukaemia cells. Therefore, the patient received chemotherapy according to the hyper-CVAD regimen, comprising cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 every 12 h for days 1–3, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 on day 4, vincristine 2 mg on days 4 and 11 and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1–4. Nine days after treatment with hyper-CVAD regimen, a WBC count was normalized to 4.7 x 109/l without leukaemia cells. On day 12, however, leukaemia cells appeared again in the peripheral blood, and the patient successively underwent intensive treatment with cytosine arabinoside 2.0 g/m2 every 12 h on days 1–5 and mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2, and he achieved complete remission (CR) that was evaluated by flow cytometry. Then, he was administered interferon alpha (six million units) three times per week (12) as a post-remission therapy.
Since the patient presented with rapid clinical course due to the aggressiveness of the disease, we decided to perform allogeneic HSCT. However, the patient had no HLA-identical donor among his family or the Japan Marrow Donor Program, and there was no appropriate umbilical cord blood with sufficient CD34+ cell doses for HSCT in the Japan Cord Blood Bank Network. In addition, his disease status did not allow us to search or wait for appropriate donors. Therefore, we selected his sister who had haplotype-identical, two loci-mismatch HLA phenotype (A and DR loci) as an alternative donor. The patient's HLA phenotype was A1101, A2402, B1501, B5401, DR0901 and DR1405, and that of the donor was A2602, A2402, B1501, B5401, DR1406 and DR1405. She was not a non-inherited maternal antigen (NIMA) mismatched donor according to microchimerism analysis. Written informed consent for this therapy was obtained.
On August 2006, the patient underwent allogeneic peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation (PBSCT) from his sister with HLA mismatched at two loci at CR state (Fig. 1). Unmanipulated PBSCs (CD34+ cells, 3.68 x 106/kg) were infused after a conditioning regimen including total body irradiation (TBI, 12 Gy), cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg) and rabbit ATG (Nippon Zoki Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd) 1.5 mg/kg on days –5 to –2. Acute GVHD prophylaxis comprised methotrexate (10 mg/m2 on day 1, 7 mg/m2 on days 3 and 6) and tacrolimus (0.03 mg/kg). Engraftment was documented on day 14 after allogeneic PBSCT, confirmed by complete donor chimerism using short tandem repeat-based polymerase chain reaction assay. On day 12, grade II acute GVHD developed, confined to the skin; this responded to methylprednisolone (mPSL, at a dose of 2 mg/kg daily), which was then gradually tapered to a maintenance dose of PSL 10 mg daily (Fig. 1).
|
On day 14, cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia was detected (10 CMV-positive cells out of 57 900 cells), and pre-emptive treatment with ganciclovir (10 mg/kg daily) was started (Fig. 1). Flow cytometric analysis of peripheral blood on day 41 demonstrated that CD4+ and CD8+ cells comprised 20.2% (92/µl) and 65.1% (295/µl) mononuclear cells, indicating the severe cellular immunocompromised state of this patient. A delayed reconstitution of CD4+ T cells was sustained after allogeneic PBSCT (68/µl on day 86, 83/µl on day 121 and 43/µl on day 202) (Fig. 1); however, on day 125 using tetrameric HLA-A2402 CMV peptide complex assay (13), CMV-specific T cells were found to be 0.23% out of all lymphocytes, suggesting a still weak but significant immune reconstitution against CMV. CMV antigenemia continued to be detected thereafter and the patient was treated with ganciclovir every day as an outpatient until day 205, when CMV antigenemia finally disappeared. An increase in HBV-DNA level was not documented throughout the treatment with lamivudine. The patient has maintained CR for 12 months after allogeneic PBSCT without GVHD, nor shown reactivation of CMV and HBV.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Prognosis of the primary PCL is extremely poor owing to the biologically aggressive nature of the disease despite intensive chemotherapy (1–4). The optimal treatment for the primary PCL is not yet well defined; however, recent studies have indicated the potential role of autologous or allogeneic HSCT to prolong overall survival (8,14). Taken together, high-dose chemotherapy and subsequent HSCT would be required to cure such patients with primary PCL who usually manifest a rapid and fatal course. Because PCL cells were not eradicated from the peripheral blood by the first two courses of chemotherapy, autologous PBSC might not have been proper for the stem cell source because of the possible contamination of PCL cells in PBSC products in this case. Thus, our patient, who had no HLA-identical donor, received haploidentical (2-HLA loci mismatched) HSCT 3 months after the initial diagnosis. In this setting, immunosuppressive therapy to prevent severe GVHD would be expected to be much more intensive than usual, and it became more likely to impair graft-versus-PCL effects and to develop severe opportunistic infections. We successfully performed haploidentical HSCT using an in vivo T-cell depletion by ATG-containing conditioning followed by a standard GVHD prophylaxis regimen, which resulted in the avoidance of severe GVHD and infectious complications.
Haploidentical HSCT is a treatment option for most patients who do not have an HLA-identical donor. To overcome the histcompatibility disparity barrier, several efforts have been made to prevent severe GVHD (15). Classically, ex vivo T-cell depletion methods were commonly used; however, T cell-depleted HSCT was complicated by a very high risk of graft failure and recurrent malignancy. Recently, Aversa et al. (16,17) developed the transplantation of megadoses of CD34-selected PBSCs from haploidentical donors after ATG-containing myeloablative conditioning but no post-transplant GVHD prophylaxis: engraftment was obtained in 94 out of 101 patients (93%), and greater than grade II acute GVHD occurred in only 8 out of 100 patients. They deliberated that a megadose of highly purified stem cells might be crucial for promoting engraftment across the histocompatibility barrier as well as avoidance of severe GVHD. In contrast, other approaches using intensification of GVHD prophylaxis or potent pre-transplant immune suppression with ATG (18,19) or alemtuzumab (20) have described similarly favourable engraftment rates and protection from GVHD, if unmanipulated grafts were transplanted. All these methods are still experimental and there is no gold standard in GVHD prophylaxis. Practically, ex vivo manipulation methods sometimes require commercially unavailable antibody and special devices, and are expensive. Thus, considering availability in our case, an ATG-containing myeloablative regimen was chosen to deplete T cells in vivo and overcome two-loci mismatched disparity.
Haploidentical HSCT has another disadvantage of delayed and incomplete immune reconstitution, resulting in the high incidence of severe infectious complications, especially viral infections (15). In this case, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were strongly suppressed throughout the patient's clinical course after HSCT; CMV reactivation was first documented even on day 14 and CMV antigenemia continued to be detectable for 6 months despite treatment with ganciclovir. On the other hand, as an advantage of haploidentical HSCT, the more potent graft-versus-tumour effect would be expected through the histcompatibility disparity (15). In fact, the curative potential of allografts relies on an immune attack of donor cells against MM (9,10), although TBI also could confer durable cytoreductive responses. Moreover, Mohty et al. have disclosed that the potent immunosuppression with ATG as a conditioning regimen did not impair the graft-versus-myeloma effect (11). In this context, haploidentical HSCT can be a treatment option for patients with primary PCL who have poor prognoses and no HLA-identical donor.
In conclusion, we describe the first case with primary PCL to be successfully treated, to our knowledge, with haploidentical (2-HLA loci mismatched) HSCT after potent pre-transplant immune suppression with an ATG-containing myeloablative regimen. Given the aggressiveness of this disease, allogeneic HSCT is a potentially curative therapy for patients with primary PCL based on graft-versus-PCL effects in addition to intensive conditioning regimens.
| Funding |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid from Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan to T.M.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
We appreciate Drs K. Ikegame (Hyogo College of Medicine) and K. Kato (University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center) for helpful discussions.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 Noel P, Kyle RA. Plasma cell leukemia: an evaluation of response to therapy. Am J Med (1987) 83:1062–8.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
2 Garcia-Sanz R, Orfao A, Gonzalez M, Tabernero MD, Blade J, Moro MJ, et al. Primary plasma cell leukemia: clinical, immunophenotypic, DNA ploidy, and cytogenetic characteristics. Blood (1999) 93:1032–7.
3 Blade J, Kyle RA. Nonsecretory myeloma, immunoglobulin D myeloma, and plasma cell leukemia. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am (1999) 13:1259–72. Review.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
4 Vela-Ojeda J, Garcia-Ruiz Esparza MA, Rosas-Cabral A, Padilla-Gonzalez Y, Garcia-Chavez J, Tripp-Villanueva F, et al. Intermediate doses of melphalan and dexamethasone are better than vincristine, adriamycin, and dexamethasone (VAD) and polychemotherapy for the treatment of primary plasma cell leukemia. Ann Hematol (2002) 81:362–7.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
5 Cai ZJ. Primary plasma cell leukemia–a comprehensive analysis of 44 cases. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi (1990) 12:314–7. Review.[Medline]
6 Costello R, Sainty D, Bouabdallah R, Fermand JP, Delmer A, Divine M, et al. Primary plasma cell leukaemia: a report of 18 cases. Leuk Res (2001) 25:103–7. Review.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
7 Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, Delasalle KB, Alexanian R. Primary plasma cell leukaemia. Br J Haematol (1994) 88:754–9.[ISI][Medline]
8 Saccaro S, Fonseca R, Veillon DM, Cotelingam J, Nordberg ML, Bredeson C, et al. Primary plasma cell leukemia: report of 17 new cases treated with autologous or allogeneic stem-cell transplantation and review of the literature. Am J Hematol (2005) 78:288–94. Review.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
9 Salama M, Nevill T, Marcellus D, Parker P, Johnson M, Kirk A, et al. Donor leukocyte infusions for multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant (2000) 26:1179–84.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
10 Lokhorst HM, Schattenberg A, Cornelissen JJ, van Oers MH, Fibbe W, Russell I, et al. Donor lymphocyte infusions for relapsed multiple myeloma after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation: predictive factors for response and long-term outcome. J Clin Oncol (2000) 18:3031–7.
11 Mohty M, Boiron JM, Damaj G, Michallet AS, Bay JO, Faucher C, et al. Graft-versus-myeloma effect following antithymocyte globulin-based reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant (2004) 34:77–84.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
12 Cernelc P, Mlakar U. Maintenance treatment of primary plasma cell leukemia with interferon alpha. Transplant Proc (2002) 34:2929–30.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
13 Gondo H, Himeji D, Kamezaki K, Numata A, Tanimoto T, Takase K, et al. Reconstitution of HLA-A*2402-restricted cytomegalovirus-specific T-cells following stem cell transplantation. Int J Hematol (2004) 80:441–8.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
14 Mak YK, Chan CH, Chen YT, Lau SM, So CC, Wong KF. Consolidation therapy with autologous blood stem cell transplantation in a patient with primary plasma cell leukaemia. Clin Lab Haematol (2003) 25:55–8.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
15 Spitzer TR. Haploidentical stem cell transplantation: the always present but overlooked donor. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. (2005) 390–5.
16 Aversa F, Tabilio A, Velardi A, Cunningham I, Terenzi A, Falzetti F, et al. Treatment of high-risk acute leukemia with T-cell-depleted stem cells from related donors with one fully mismatched HLA haplotype. N Engl J Med (1998) 339:9311–93.
17 Aversa F, Terenzi A, Tabilio A, Falzetti F, Carotti A, Ballanti S, et al. Full haplotype-mismatched hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: a phase II study in patients with acute leukemia at high risk of relapse. J Clin Oncol (2005) 23:3447–54.
18 Champlin R, Hesdorffer C, Lowenberg B, Martelli MF, Mertelsmann RH, Reisner Y, et al. Haploidentical megadose stem cell transplantation in acute leukemia: recommendations for a protocol agreed upon at the Perugia and Chicago meetings. Leukemia (2002) 16:427–8. Review.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
19 Huang XJ, Liu DH, Liu KY, Xu LP, Chen H, Han W, et al. Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation without in vitro T-cell depletion for the treatment of hematological malignancies. Bone Marrow Transplant (2006) 38:291–7.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
20 Kanda Y, Oshima K, Asano-Mori Y, Kandabashi K, Nakagawa M, Sakata-Yanagimoto M, et al. In vivo alemtuzumab enables haploidentical human leukocyte antigen-mismatched hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation without ex vivo graft manipulation. Transplantation (2005) 27:1351–7.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
