Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology Advance Access published online on August 31, 2007
Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, doi:10.1093/jjco/hym086
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2007 Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research
Recurrence-free Survival after Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. A Registry Report of the Impact of Risk Factors on Outcome
1 Radiology Department, Menoufiya University School of Medicine, Menoufiya, Egypt
2 PET Center, Dokkyo University School of Medicine, Shimotsuga-gun, Tochigi, Japan
3 Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology Department, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
4 Interventional Radiology Department, Ain Shams University School of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt
5 Radiology Department, National Liver Institute, Menoufiya, Egypt
For reprints and all correspondence: Ashraf Anas Zytoon, Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufiya University, Shebin E1-Koom, Menoufiya, Egypt. E-mail: ashradio{at}yahoo.com
Received March 13, 2007; accepted April 25, 2007
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 TOP Abstract IntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionConflict of interest statementReferences |
|---|
Background: Despite the high complete necrosis rate of radiofrequency ablation (RFA), tumor recurrence, either local tumor recurrence or new tumor formation, remains a significant problem. Purpose of this study is to evaluate the pattern and risk factors for intrahepatic recurrence after percutaneous RFA for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Methods: We studied 40 patients with 48 HCCs (
3.5 cm) who were treated with percutaneous RFA. The mean follow-up period was 24.1 ± 15.7 months. We evaluated the cumulative disease-free survival of overall intrahepatic recurrence, local tumor progression (LTP) and intrahepatic distant recurrence (IDR). Thirty host, tumoral and therapeutic risk factors were reviewed for significant tie-in correlation with recurrence: age; gender; whether RFA was the initial treatment for HCC or not; severity of liver disease; cause of liver cirrhosis; contact of tumor to major hepatic vessels and liver capsule; degree of approximation of tumor to the liver hilum; ablation time; degree of benign pre-ablational enhancement; sufficient safety margin; tumor multinodularity; tumor histological differentiation; tumor segmental location; maximum tumor diameter; degree of tumor pre-ablational enhancement at arterial phase CT, MRI or CT-angiography; and laboratory markers pre- and post-ablation (AFP, PIVKA II, TP, AST, ALT, ALP and TB).
Results: The incidence of overall recurrence, LTP and IDR was 65, 23 and 52.5%, respectively. The cumulative disease-free survival rates were 54.6, 74.8 and 78.3% at 1 year, 27.3, 71.9 and 46.3% at 2 years and 20, 71.9 and 29.4 at 3 years, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that the significant risk factors for LTP were: tumor size 
2.3 cm, insufficient safety margin, multinodular tumor, tumors located at segments 8 and 5, and patient's age > 65 years (P < 0.05). No significant risk factor relationship for IDR could be detected.
Conclusion: Our results would have clinical implications for advance warning and appropriate management of patients scheduled for RFA. Patients at risk of LTP should be closely monitored in the first year. Furthermore, regular long-term surveillance is essential for early detection and eradication of IDR.
Key Words: recurrence-free survival • risk ratio • RFA, radiofrequency ablation • HCC
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TOPAbstractIntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionConflict of interest statementReferences |
|---|
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the cause of 250 000 deaths worldwide each year. HCC is often advanced at first manifestation, and without treatment the 5-year survival rate is less than 5% (1). Only 9–27% of the patients with HCC are eligible for surgical resection. There are many limiting factors for successful surgical resection in patients with HCC such as severe impairment of hepatic functional reserve, bilobar distribution of the tumors, extra hepatic metastasis or involvement of the portal vein (2,3). Hence, different locoregional therapies have been developed for irresectable liver tumors with an attempt to achieve local tumor control. These include transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), and various thermal ablation therapies such as cryotherapy, interstitial laser therapy, microwave coagulation and radiofrequency ablation (4–7). Although these ablation therapies can achieve complete necrosis of small HCC, recurrence is still common. Most HCCs are associated with liver cirrhosis, and total prevention of recurrence might not be achieved even in the future (8). The intrahepatic recurrence rate is 20% during a mean follow-up period of 18 months (9). However, it is still unclear which factors influence intrahepatic recurrence (10).
Among the local methods for tumor control, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is considered a promising alternative to surgery (11). For irresectable tumors, RFA seems to be the most effective treatment among other locoregional therapies. The main advantages of RFA include low morbidity and mortality rates, effective tumor ablation and preservation of maximal normal liver parenchyma (12). However, despite the high complete necrosis rate of RFA, early tumor recurrence within one year, either local tumor recurrence or new tumor formation, remains a significant problem. A series of studies discussed the factors for tumor recurrence, including the tumor size, subcapsular lesion, operative procedure, underlying liver disease and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels, but the results were not well documented (13–17).
There are two types of intrahepatic recurrence found in patients with HCC after RFA, local tumor progression and intrahepatic distant recurrence. Local tumor progression (LTP) occurs along the peripheral margin of the ablative lesion and intrahepatic distant recurrence (IDR) is a new HCC tumor remote from the margin of the ablative lesion. Evaluation of overall recurrence as well as LTP and IDR may provide important information for the management of HCC patients receiving RFA therapy (18).
Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the pattern of cumulative recurrence-free survival rate after percutaneous RFA of hepatocellular carcinoma and to determine the risk factors and the incidence of intrahepatic recurrence according to each type. To assign that task, many potential risk factors were reviewed for significant tie-in correlation to intrahepatic recurrence.
|
Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
TOPAbstractIntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionConflict of interest statementReferences |
|---|
Study Population
From February 2000 to November 2005, a total of 40 patients with 48 HCC nodules underwent percutaneous RFA for the treatment of HCC by a multidisciplinary team consisting of hepatobiliary physicians and interventional radiologists. Ultrasound-guided ablation was performed in the Hepatobiliary Oncology Department and CT-guided ablation in the Radiology Department, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japan.
In all patients, a written informed consent was obtained. This study was approved by our institutional review board. Ablation performed in inpatient participants after they had fasted for 6 h. Laboratory examinations including complete blood count, blood coagulation test, blood typing and tumor marker for HCC (AFP) were performed before each procedure. Inclusion criteria for performing RFA in patients with HCC are as follows: the tumor or tumors should be visualized with ultrasonography (US) or CT and accessible via the percutaneous route; a single tumor no greater than 5 cm in the largest dimension; multiple tumors (<3) with each tumor measuring no greater than 3 cm; no portal venous thrombosis and extrahepatic metastasis; prothrombin time ratio over 50% (prothrombin time with international normalized ratio, INR < 1.7) and a platelet count greater than 50 000/µl without transfusion support.
For all patients, proof of HCC malignancy was attained by the typical imaging features at US, triphasic CT, triphasic MRI, celiac angiography or CT-angiography along with a serum AFP, PIVKA II tumor markers and US-guided biopsy. The imaging criteria for HCC were a newly presenting, residual or recurrent tumor at follow-up US or CT in patients with chronic liver disease or a characteristic enhancement pattern on contrast-enhanced multi-phase CT and/or MRI (hypervascularization on hepatic arterial phase and wash-out pattern on delayed phase), filling defect at CTAP or tumor staining at DSA and CTA.
The patients were predominantly elderly (mean age 65.6 ± 8.5) and male (77.5%). Five patients had a past history of HCC therapy with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (n = 3), surgical resection (n = 1) or percutaneous microwave ablation (n = 1), prior to RFA for the recurrent tumor. All the tumors in these five patients included in our study were newly developed lesions, and there was no evidence of viability of the tumors that had been treated previously. Mean value of the period between the latest previous treatment and RFA was 18 ± 12.8 months with a range of 3–34 months.
Severity of the underlying cirrhosis was classified in accordance with the Child–Pugh classification. The etiology of cirrhosis was chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in 33 (82.8%) patients, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in four (10%) patients and cirrhosis due to hepatitis of non-viral causes in three (7.5%) patients. Clinical features of patients and tumors are summarized in Table 1.
|
Radiofrequency Ablation
The RF system used in this study was the RF 2000 (RadioTherapeutics, Mountain View, CA, USA), which included a 100 W generator, a 15-gauge monopolar electrode array with 10 hook-like arms and needle electrodes of 2 and 3 cm diameter (LeVeen; RadioTherapeutics). Hot withdrawal was performed to prevent oozing and tumor seeding. When the ablation was started, we often ablated the deepest parts first and the superficial parts last to avoid imaging disturbances caused by hyperechogenic gas artifacts generated from boiling tissue. The average time required for ablation ranged from 3 to 51.11 min with a mean value of 20.6 ± 11.8 min. The goal of radio-frequency thermal ablation is to kill the target tumor as well as a 5 mm circumferential cuff of adjacent normal hepatic parenchyma as a safety margin.
RF ablations were performed via the percutaneous route under US-guidance (n = 44) or CT-guidance (n = 4). Image guided ablation was performed using a real-time US (GE Logiq 5 Expert) scanner with 3.5–5.0 MHz convex probes equipped with attachments for biopsy and electrode insertion. For CT-guided tumor ablation a Toshiba Aquilion multislice-CT (MS-CT) scanner with 16 row detector channels was used. The patients received 35 mg of pethidine hydrochloride (Opystan, Tanabe, Tokyo, Japan) intravenously before RFA for analgesia. Antibiotics were administered before and 2–3 days after each PEI and RFA procedure. Local infiltration anesthesia was induced by using 5–10 ml of 1% lidocaine.
Evaluation of Therapeutic Efficiency
To evaluate the tumor response to ablation therapy, contrast-enhanced CT was performed 1 month after the treatment. Additional CT scans were obtained in all patients within 1 day after completion of therapy to determine whether there was any remaining malignant tissue that would require a second ablation session and also for early detection of complication. The ablation was considered a success on the basis of all of the following findings at follow-up CT: (a) no contrast enhancement detected within or around the tumor; (b) the margins of the ablation zone clear and smooth; and (c) the ablation zone extended beyond the previously estimated tumor borders.
If any residual HCC was noted, we repeated the RFA as soon as possible (n = 5) and then performed a second immediate follow-up CT scan. We confirmed that there was no evidence of residual tumor that went untreated in all patients. As a follow-up rule thereafter, contrast-enhanced CT, US scan and measurement of serum AFP were performed regularly every 3–4 months.
Risk Factors for Recurrence
Intrahepatic recurrence was divided into LTP and IDR based on standardization of terminology and reporting criteria by the international working group of image-guided tumor ablation (19). Local tumor recurrence of an HCC nodule was defined as the development of an enhanced area on the CT scan in the same sub-segment as the primary nodule and was found along the peripheral margin of the ablative zone. Intrahepatic distant recurrence of HCC was defined as a lesion with typical enhancement characteristics for HCC but distant from the original ablative zone. IDR was evaluated for patients for whom complete coagulation was achieved without recurrence in the same sub-segment as the primary nodule. In case of recurrence, other supplemental examinations like MRI, hepatic DSA and angio-CT were performed to confirm not only local but also distant recurrence of HCC. When tumor recurrence was confirmed, patients were hospitalized and an additional treatment cycle was administered if the patient's physical condition was strong enough for him or her to safely undergo another ablation session(s). Patients who developed diffuse HCC were shifted to transarterial embolization (TAE), hepatic artery infusion (TAI), radiotherapy or proton beam therapy.
Statistical Analysis
After review of the follow-up CT, we assessed the incidence and the cumulative recurrence-free survival rate of overall recurrence, LTP and IDR, respectively. Data analyses were performed using MedCalc statistical software for Biomedical research (version 9 for Windows).
For analysis of the significant risk factors for LTP, 30 host, tumoral and therapeutic variables were reviewed: (1) age, (2) gender, (3) whether RFA was the initial treatment for HCC or not (previous history of interventional or surgical), (4) severity of liver disease according to standard Child–Pugh classification, (5) cause of liver cirrhosis (hepatitis C or B or non viral hepatitis), (6 and 7) contact of tumor to major hepatic vessels and liver capsule, (8) degree of approximation of tumor to the liver hilum, (9) ablation time, (10) the degree of benign periablational enhancement at immediate follow-up CT (grade 0, no enhancement; grade 1, disrupted non-continuous enhancement; grade 2, continuous rim enhancement), (11) ablation safety margin is sufficient or not (sufficient 5 mm, pre- and post ablation CT were as reference), (12) number of primary HCC nodules at the time of ablation (single or multiple), (13) tumor histological differentiation (well, moderate or poorly differentiated), (14) tumor segmental location (in segments 5 and 8 or others), (15) maximum tumor diameter (we divided the tumors into small and large groups with the cutting value of 2.3 cm), (16) degree of tumor pre-ablational enhancement at arterial phase CT, MRI or CT-angiography (strongly or poorly enhanced), (17–30) laboratory markers pre- and post-ablation within normal limits or not (alpha-fetoprotein, des-gamma carboxy prothrombin, total protein, aspartate transaminase enzyme, alanine transaminase enzyme, alkaline phosphatase enzyme and total bilirubin).
For the IDR, 21 host, tumoral and therapeutic variables were reviewed: (1) age, (2) gender, (3) whether RFA was the initial treatment for HCC or not (previous history of interventional or surgical), (4) severity of liver disease according to standard Child–Pugh classification, (5) cause of liver cirrhosis (hepatitis C or B or non viral hepatitis), (6) number of primary HCC nodules at the time of ablation (single or multiple), (7) tumor histological differentiation (well, moderate, or poorly differentiated), (8–21) laboratory markers pre- and post-ablation within normal limits or not (alpha-fetoprotein, des-gamma carboxy prothrombin, total protein, aspartate transaminase enzyme, alanine transaminase enzyme, alkaline phosphatase enzyme and total bilirubin). These risk factors were analyzed retrospectively.
The unpaired Student's t-test was used to compare averages between groups and the 
2-test and Fisher's exact probability test were used to compare independence. Cumulative disease-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and the significance of the hazard ratio for LTP and IDR was evaluated with univariate analysis using the log-rank test. If multiple hazard ratios were proven to be significant by this test, we performed multivariate analysis using a stepwise Cox proportional hazard regression model to search for independently significant risk factors. The results were reported as ratios with 95% CI. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TOPAbstractIntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionConflict of interest statementReferences |
|---|
Intrahepatic Recurrence
In 26 of 40 patients (65%), intrahepatic recurrence (LTP, n = 5; IDR, n = 15; LTP + IDR, n = 6) was found during the follow-up period of 24.1 ± 15.7 months (range 1–50). These were found 2–39 months (3–18 for LTP, 2–39 for IDR) after RFA with a median of 11 months (6 for LTP, 18 for IDR), 95% confidence interval (CI), 10.5–18 months (3.4–11.4 for LTP, 7.8–24.5 for IDR). The 12, 24 and 36 month cumulative recurrence-free survival rates were 54.6% (95% CI, 37.5–71.7%), 27.3% (95% CI, 11.4–43.2%) and 20% (95% CI, 5.4–34.5%) respectively (Fig. 1a). LTP was found in 11 of 48 tumors (23%) and occurred 3–18 months after the procedure with a median of 6 months (95% CI, 3.4–11.4 months). Thirty-seven treated tumors had no LTP during the entire follow-up period up to 50 months. For all patients (n = 40), the mean LTP-free survival was 36.9 ± 18.5 months. However, the mean LTP-free survival in those patients with LTP (n = 11) was 7.5 ± 4.4 months. The 12, 24 and 36 month cumulative LTP-free survival rates were 74.8% (95% CI, 61.3–88.4%), 71.9% (95% CI, 57.6–86.1%) and 71.9% (95% CI, 57.6–86.1%), respectively (Fig. 1b). IDR was found in 21 of 40 patients (52.5%) during the follow-up period. These recurrent tumors occurred from 2.0 to 39 months after RFA with a median of 18 months (95% CI, 7.8–24.5 months). The 12, 24 and 36 month cumulative IDR-free survival rates were 78.3% (95% CI, 64–92.6%) 46.3% (95% CI, 28.1–64.4%), and 29.4% (95% CI, 11.5–47.2%), respectively (Fig. 1c). We summarize these data in Table 2.
|
|
Risk Factors Analysis of Intrahepatic Recurrence
Tables 3 and 5 summarize the results of the hazard ratio analysis for each type of intrahepatic recurrence associated with HCC after percutaneous RFA. Data expressed in Tables 3 and 5 was analyzed using the t-test, one-way Anova test, Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test.
|
|
Local Tumor Progression
When we set the criterion for large tumors to be
2.3 cm in the greatest dimension, the incidence of LTP was 3/32 (9.4%) in small tumors and 8/16 (50%) in large tumors. The Kaplan–Meier estimates of the 12, and 24 month recurrence-free survival after RFA were 87.7% (95% CI, 74.6–100%), same ratio, for small tumors and 55% (95% CI, 30.1–79.9%) and 47.1% (95% CI, 21.5–72.8%) for large tumors, respectively. Small tumors had a statistically significant longer LTP-free survival compared with large tumors (P = 0.0054; Fig. 2a).
|
We determined statistical significance (P = 0.0313) for LTP between HCC nodules ablated with sufficient safety margin (7/41; 17%), and nodules ablated with insufficient safety margin (4/7; 57.1%). The Kaplan–Meier estimates of the 12, and 24 month recurrence free survival after RFA were 78.4% (95% CI, 64.1–92.6%), same ratio, for sufficient ablation margin and 57.1% (95% CI, 20.5–93.8%) and 42.9% (95% CI, 6.2–79.5%) for insufficient ablation margin, respectively (P = 0.0313; Fig. 2b).
Statistical analysis of the number of primary HCC nodules at the time of ablation revealed that the LTP incidence was 4/34 (11.8%) for primary uninodular HCC and 7/14 (50%) for primary multinodular HCC. The Kaplan–Meier estimates of the 12, and 24 month recurrence-free survival after RFA were 85.8% (95% CI, 72.8–98.7%), same ratio, for primary uninodular HCC and 50% (95% CI, 21.7–78.3%) and 41.7% (95% CI, 13.8–69.6%) for primary multinodular HCC, respectively. The primary multinodular HCC was significantly associated with a higher LTP rate compared with primary uninodular HCC (P = 0.0045; Fig. 2c).
Statistical analysis for the risk factors associated with LTP, determined significant (P = 0.0305) high LTP ratio for tumors located at segments 8 and 5 (9/26; 34.6%), more than other segments (2/22; 9.1%). The Kaplan–Meier estimates of the 12 and 24 month recurrence-free survival after RFA were 66.7% (95% CI, 47.8–85.5%) and 61.9% (95% CI, 42.2–81.6%), for segments 8 and 5 and 86.9% (95% CI, 69.8–100%), same ratio, for other segments, respectively (P = 0.0305; Fig. 2d).
When we set the criterion for the age to be 65 years, the incidence of LTP was 2/21 (9.5%) in patients 65 years old and 9/27 (33.3%) in patients >65 years old. The Kaplan–Meier estimates of the 12 and 24 month recurrence-free survival after RFA were 94.7% (95% CI, 89.5–100%) and 88% (95% CI, 72.1–100%) for age 65 years and 59.1% (95% CI, 38.5–79.6%) same ratio for 12 and 24 months for age >65 years, respectively. Patients 65 years old had a statistically significant longer LTP-free survival compared with patients >65 years old (P = 0.0366) (Fig. 3).
|
Statistical analysis determined high hazard ratio for elevated AFP post-ablation (2.476) and low total protein (TP) pre-ablation (2.411); however, the P-value was not significant for both (P = 0.2368 and 0.3946 respectively).
We could not determine a significant correlation between the incidence of LTP and gender, previous HCC therapy, severity of liver disease, cause of liver cirrhosis, contact of tumor to major hepatic vessels and liver capsule, degree of approximation of tumor to liver hilum, ablation time, the degree of benign pre-ablational enhancement, tumor histological differentiation, degree of tumor enhancement pre-ablation or laboratory markers. Also the hazard ratios for all were low, except for elevated AFP post-ablation and low TP pre-ablation.
To evaluate independent risk factors proven to be significant based on univariate analysis, we performed a multivariate analysis by a stepwise Cox hazards regression model. We found that tumor diameter 2.3 cm (risk ratio 8.4, 95% CI 1.7–41.7, P = 0.0096), insufficient ablation of safety margin (risk ratio 6.3, 95% CI 1.1–35.7, P = 0.0396), tumor multiplicity at the time of ablation (risk ratio 5.2, 95% CI 1.0–26.3, P = 0.0482), tumors located at segments 8 and 5 (risk ratio 4.6, 95% CI 1.9–11.3, P = 0.0007) and patient's age >65y (risk ratio 4.3, 95% CI 1.8–10.3, P = 0.0011) were statistically significant risk factors for LTP after percutaneous RFA for HCC (Table 4).
|
Intrahepatic Distant Recurrence
IDR occurred in 21 of 40 patients (52.5%). Among the 21 risk factors investigated for IDR, no significant correlation could be described with the length of the IDR-free survival. The highest hazard ratio (2.274) was recorded for elevated AFP pre-ablation in spite of the correlation not being significant (P = 0.0777; Table 5).
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TOPAbstractIntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionConflict of interest statementReferences |
|---|
We categorized intrahepatic recurrence of HCC after percutaneous RFA into local tumor progression and intrahepatic distant recurrence; each type of recurrence has a specific mechanism of pathogenesis and is thought to occur independently. Generally, LTP occurs early and is considered to be related to residual tumor cells that have spread microscopically beyond the ablative margin, although there is a possibility of de novo occurrence at that site. Pathogenesis of IDR is thought to be the result of an intrahepatic metastasis of a primary HCC or due to a multicentric origin of the HCC (20,21). Therefore, LTP may be associated more with a treatment methodology or result, local environment of the tumor such as a vessel contact and characteristics of the tumor itself rather than the systemic condition of the patient. By contrast, IDR may be related more to systemic factors rather than local factors (18). Therefore, we analyzed a variety of potential local and systemic risk factors for LTP and IDR associated with HCC, independently.
There have been several studies reporting on the incidence and risk factors of LTP or IDR after RFA for HCC. Komorizono et al. (13), who studied LTP after a single application of RF energy for relatively small HCC, reported a tumor-free survival rate at 12 and 15 months of 76 and 74%, respectively. Significant risk factors for LTP were reported to be a large tumor size over 2 cm in the greatest dimension and a subcapsular location. Hori et al. (22), who also studied a similar group of subjects, reported that the cumulative local recurrence rates were 9.7, 15.4 and 20.4% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. Significant risk factors for LTP were tumor size and tumor location. Izumi et al. (23) reported that the IDR, after RFA or microwave ablation for HCC, was found in 22 out of 84 patients (26.2%; median follow-up period, 22 months); significant risk factors for IDR were an increased level of serum AFP, a hepatitis C virus infection and multifocal HCC at the time of treatment. Harrison et al. (14) reported that the LTP rate was 39.1% and the IDR rate was 30.4% in their 3-year follow-up study, and that the significant risk factors for overall recurrence were a large tumor size, an increase in serum AFP level and the presence of hepatitis. Yamanaka et al. (10) reported, in their study of RFA for HCC in patients with hepatitis C, that the cumulative recurrence rates after 1 and 2 years were 30.8 and 86.8% for multinodular HCC and 15.4 and 29.5% for uninodular HCC; the investigators found significant risk factors to be associated with the number of HCC nodules, low serum platelets and albumin level. Kim et al. (18) recently estimated the incidence of the cumulative disease-free survival for the overall recurrence, LTP and IDR. In his study, the incidence of overall recurrence, LTP and IDR was 62.9, 26.4 and 53.2%, respectively. The cumulative disease-free survival rates were 52, 82 and 56% at 1 year, and 26, 63 and 30% at 2 years, respectively. The significant risk factors for LTP were a tumor with a diameter > 3 cm, contact of HCC with a vessel and an insufficient safety margin. Only the increased serum alpha-fetoprotein was a significant risk factor for IDR.
Concerning this current study, the incidences of overall recurrence, LTP and IDR were 65, 23 and 52.5%, respectively. The cumulative disease-free survival rates were 54.6, 74.8 and 78.3% at 1 year, and 27.3, 71.9 and 46.3% at 2 years, respectively. The significant risk factors for LTP were a tumor with a diameter 2.3 cm, an insufficient safety margin, a multinodular tumor at the time of ablation, tumors located at segments 8 and 5, and patient's age >65 years. We could not ascertain significant risk factors for IDR. Our results are in line with those of Kim et al. (18), who reported that overall recurrence rate after RFA is two-thirds of treated patients; IDR occurs more frequently than LTP and LTP almost always occurs during the first 24 months postablation; IDR could occur at any time during the first 24 months postablation or later on (Table 6).
|
In two patients included in our study, residual tumors were found on immediate follow-up CT scans. In those cases, we repeated the procedures as soon as possible to achieve complete ablation. Then, we confirmed complete treatment on another immediate follow-up CT scan after the additional RFA. We included these cases in our study population and analyzed them as the same as those cases with a single complete ablation; this is because there was no reason to differentiate them from the other cases with a single-session ablation.
Hori et al. (22) reported that recurrence is low in HCC 2.3 cm and increased if the tumor is 2.5 cm in its maximum diameter. Our results in harmony with Hori et al. Reported in other series as well as our study, that the most important variable which influences the LTP, is tumor size (10,22). In the present study, large tumor size (larger than or equal to 2.3 cm) proved the highest risk ratio for LTP (8.4036, P = 0.0096). Matching our results is the large study conducted by Nakashima et al. (33). Nakashima et al. investigated the relationship between macroscopic types of HCC and intrahepatic metastasis in 209 surgically resected small HCC nodules less than 3 cm in diameter. Vaguely nodular and single nodular types (mean diameter 1.36 and 2.28 cm, respectively) were found to have lower prevalence of intrahepatic metastasis (0 and 4.1%, respectively) than single nodular with extranodular growth and confluent multinodular types (mean diameter 2.31 and 2.39 cm, intrahepatic metastasis 26.7 and 26.3%, respectively) (33). It was reported that the coagulated necrotic area produced by RFA conformed to the size of the tumor and was smaller than expected in the surrounding cirrhotic tissue, and larger than expected within the tumor (called the ‘oven effect’) (24). In the present study, 16 of 48 tumors were 2.3 cm in diameter with LTP incidence 8/16 (50%). Several small satellite nodules might have existed around tumors larger than 25 mm in diameter and these satellite nodules could not be completely treated by single-session RFA in tumors larger than 25 mm since they are difficult to detect by transcutaneous US, dynamic CT or dynamic MRI (22,25).
Although there have been studies on a safe tumor-free margin of a surgical resection for hepatic tumors, this remains an unresolved problem (21,26,27). A gross tumor-free margin of 1 cm in all directions around the tumor in the resected specimen is generally accepted by most surgeons and pathologists. Local recurrence was more frequently observed after limited resections than after anatomic resections that included the tumor and its portal territory (50 vs 10%). Patients undergoing anatomic resection for HCC achieved better disease-free survival than those undergoing limited resection (26). RFA in our study was performed percutaneously; evaluation could be done with CT images pre- and post-procedure. We set and evaluated a safe ablative margin as 5 mm in all directions around the tumor and two CT scans before and after the RFA were analyzed. We showed that the establishment of a 5 mm ablative margin was effective in suppressing LTP after RFA of HCC and, without this safety margin ablation, LTP incidence was 57.1% (risk ratio = 6.2643, P = 0.0396).
Tumor multiplicity is a strong indicator of tumor recurrence after curative resection of HCC (8), microwave (23) or radiofrequency ablation (10,23). We obtained the same end result; statistical analysis of the number of primary HCC nodules at the time of ablation revealed that the LTP incidence was 7/14 (50%) for primary multinodular HCC. The primary multinodular HCC was significantly associated with a higher LTP (risk ratio = 5.1790, P = 0.0482).
Tumor location is one of the most important factors influencing LTP. Eleven LTP tumors showed segmental distribution as follows: S8 (n = 4), S5 (n = 2), S8 + 5 (n = 3) and S6 (n = 2). One of the reasons why segment 8 + 5 showed a higher LTP rate may be that there were more chances for dual arterial feeders from segmental arteries. The other possible reason may be the greater probability for collateral vessels developing from the adjacent segmental arteries after ablation. This agrees with the conclusion of Yun et al. (28), concerning significant risk for local recurrence after chemoembolization for HCC in tumor located in segmental border zone. If tumor located in S8 attained a sub-diaphragmatic location, then LTP was significantly higher compared with that in tumors situated more deeply within the liver parenchyma. When the tumors were located close to the liver surface beneath the diaphragm, it was not easy to insert the RFA electrode and open the multiple-array at the center of the tumor. In the present study, three of four S8 locally recurrent tumors were located beneath the diaphragm. Recently, it was reported that the laparoscopic approach and artificial ascites method for percutaneous treatment were effective techniques for the treatment of patients with HCC located just beneath the diaphragm (24,29–31). These techniques are recommended for the treatment of tumors located close to the surface (22). In the same way, tumors in segment 5 have a greater chance of being near to the gall bladder and consequently in this location it is complicated to achieve complete ablation by RFA. In this study, one of two tumors at S5 was located near to the gall bladder. Percutaneous ethanol injection was recommended in such patients (risk ratio = 4.6420, P = 0.0007).
The patient's age was confirmed as an independent prognostic variable, perhaps representing a surrogate for declining host defense mechanism associated with advancing age. The incidence of LTP was 9/27 (33.3%) in patients >65 years old (risk ratio 4.6420, P = 0.0011).
Theoretically, a tumor that is contiguous to a large vessel has more chance of allowing some tumor cells to survive local thermal therapy because there is a significant tissue cooling effect caused by blood circulation of normal body temperature (32). However, previous studies (13,18,22) showed that it was not a significant risk factor for LTP after RFA for HCC and our results agree with them; we could not ascertain that contiguity to a large vessel is a significant risk factor for LTP.
Previous studies proved that an increased level of serum AFP was associated with IDR after RFA for HCC (14,16,18,23). In our study the correlation between serum AFP and IDR was not significant (P = 0.0777); however the pre-ablation elevated AFP level recorded the highest hazard ratio (2.274) among all other risk factors investigated for IDR.
In our study, 91% of LTP occurred after 12 months and after 18 months; tumors that did not recur during that interval did not show any LTP during the residual follow-up period of up to 50 months. This time interval has great clinical significance because it can affect the follow-up CT schedule as well as patient prognosis. It is an important explanation for why the close follow-up protocol is indispensable during the first year. Kim et al. (18) support our standpoint; in his study, the incidence of LTP after 24 months is 0%.
|
Conclusion |
|---|
|
TOPAbstractIntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionConflict of interest statementReferences |
|---|
We can conclude that, after percutaneous RFA for HCC, overall recurrence rate after RFA reaches two-thirds of the treated patients. IDR occurs more frequently than LTP and LTP almost always occurs during the first 18 months post-ablation; IDR could occur at any time earlier during the first 24 months post-ablation or later on. Although less frequent, LTP tended to occur when we ablated a large HCC tumor
2.3 cm in dimension, or when we could not establish a sufficient safety margin. Tumor multinodularity, tumors located at segments 8 and 5, and patients over 65 years are further significant risk factors. Our findings of different risk factors and prognostic factors for intrahepatic recurrence after RFA of HCC may have clinical implications in determining rational strategies in post-ablation surveillance, prevention and management of recurrence. Patients at risk of LTP should be closely monitored in the first year. Furthermore, regular long-term surveillance is essential for early detection and eradication of IDR. |
Conflict of interest statement |
|---|
|
TOPAbstractIntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionConflict of interest statementReferences |
|---|
None declared.
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
|---|
The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr Shigeru Nawano, Chief, Radiology Department, and Dr Yoshifumi Kuroki, Head, Gastrointestinal Radiology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, East, Japan, for their valuable assistance.
|
References |
|---|
|
TOPAbstractIntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionConflict of interest statementReferences |
|---|
1 Clark HP, Carson WF, Kavanagh PV, Ho CPH, Shen P, Zagoria RJ. Staging and current treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. RadioGraphics (2005) 25:S3–S23.
2 Okuda K, and the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. Primary liver cancers in Japan. Cancer (1980) 45:2663–9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
3 Lai EC, Fan ST, Lo CM, Chu KM, Liu CL, Wong J. Hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. An audit of 343 patients. Ann Surg (1995) 221:291–8.[Web of Science][Medline]
4 Dodd G, Soulen M, Kane R, Livraghi T, Lees WR, Yamashita Y, et al. Minimally invasive treatment of malignant hepatic tumors: at the threshold of a major breakthrough. Radiographies (2000) 20:9–27.[Medline]
5 Poon RT, Fan ST, Tsang FH, Wong J. Locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: a critical review from the surgeon's perspective. Ann Surg (2002) 235:466–86.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
6 Primrose JN. Treatment of colorectal metastases: surgery, cryotherapy, or radiofrequency ablation. Gut (2002) 50:1–5.
7 Ng KK, Lam CM, Poon RT, Ai V, Tso WK, Fan ST. Thermal ablative therapy for malignant liver tumors: a critical appraisal. J Gastroenterol Hepatol (2003) 18:616–29.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
8 Ikeda K, Saitoh S, Tsubota A, Arase Y, Chayama K, Kumada H, et al. Risk factors for tumor recurrence and prognosis after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer (1993) 71:19–25.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
9 Yamakado K, Nakatsuka A, Akeboshi M, Shiraki K, Nakano T, Takeda K. Combination therapy with radiofrequency ablation and transcatheter chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: short-term recurrences and survival. Oncol Rep (2004) 11:105–109.[Web of Science][Medline]
10 Yamanaka Y, Shiraki K, Kazumi M, Inoue T, Kawakita T, Yamaguchi Y, et al. Risk factors for the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis C. World J Gastroenterol (2005) 11:2174–8.[Medline]
11 Buscarini E, Savoia A, Brambilla G, Menozzi F, Reduzzi L, Strobel D, et al. Radiofrequency thermal ablation of liver tumors. Eur Radiol (2005) 15:884–94.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
12 Kwok-Chiu Ng K, Tung-Ping Poon R. Role of radiofrequency ablation for liver malignancies. Surg Practice (2005) 9:94–103.[CrossRef]
13 Komorizono Y, Oketani M, Sako K, Shibatou N, Maeda M, Shigenobu S, Ishibashi K, Arima T. Risk factors for local recurrence of small hepatocellular carcinoma tumors after a single session, single application of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation. Cancer (2003) 97:1253–62.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
14 Harrison LE, Koneru B, Baramipour P, Fisher A, Barone A, Wilson D, Torre AD, Cho KC, Contractor D, Korogodsky M. Locoregional recurrences are frequent after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg (2003) 197:759–64.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
15 Kosari K, Gornes M, Hunter D, Hess DF, Greeno E, Sielaff TD. Local, intrahepatic, and systemic recurrence patterns after radiofrequency ablation of hepatic malignancies. J Gastrointest Surg (2002) 6:255–63.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
16 Llovet JM, Vilana R, Bru C, Bianchi L, Salmeron JM, Boix L, Ganau S, Sala M, Pages M, Ayuso C, Sole M, Rodes J, Bruix J. Increased risk of tumor seeding after percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation for single hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology (2001) 33:1124–9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
17 Yu H-C, Cheng J-S, Lai K-H, Lin C-P, Lo G-H, Lin C-K, et al. Factors for early tumor recurrence of single small hepatocellular carcinoma after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation therapy. World J Gastroenterol (2005) 11:1439–44.[Medline]
18 Kim YS, Rhim H, Cho OK, Koh BH, Kim Y. Intrahepatic recurrence after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of the pattern and risk factors. Eur J Radiol (2006) 59:432–41.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
19 Goldberg SN, Grassi CJ, Cardella JF, Charboneau JW, Dodd GD, Dupuy DE, et al. Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria. J Vasc Interv Radiol (2005) 16:165–78.[Web of Science][Medline]
20 Okuda K. Hepatocellular carcinoma: recent progress. Hepatology (1992) 15:948–63.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
21 Poon RT, Fan ST, Ng IO, Lo CM, Liu CL, Wong J. Different risk factors and prognosis for early and late intrahepatic recurrence after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer (2000) 89:500–517.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
22 Hori T, Nagata K, Hasuike S, Onaga M, Motoda M, Moriuchi A, et al. Risk factors for the local recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after a single session of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation. J Gastroenterol (2003) 38:977–81.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
23 Izumi N, Asahina Y, Noguchi O, Uchihara M, Kanazawa N, Itakura J, et al. Risk factors for distant recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in the liver after complete coagulation by microwave or radiofrequency ablation. Cancer (2001) 91:949–56.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
24 Abe T, Shinzawa H, Wakabayashi H, Aoki M, Sugahara K, Iwaba A, et al. Value of laparoscopic microwave coagulation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma in relation to tumor size and location. Endoscopy (2000) 32:598–603.[CrossRef][Medline]
25 Merine D, Takayasu K, Wakao F. Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of CT during arterial portography with CT after intraarterial injection of iodized oil. Radiology (1990) 175:707–10.
26 Regimbeau JM, Kianmanesh R, Farges O, Dondero F, Dauvanet A, Bel-ghiti J. Extent of liver resection influences the outcome in patients with cirrhosis and small hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgery (2002) 131:311–17.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
27 Poon RT, Fan ST, Ng IO, Wong J. Significance of resection margin in hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a critical reappraisal. Ann Surg (2000) 231:544–51.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
28 Cho YK, Chung JW, Ahn YS, Park YO, Kim JK, Byun JH. Risk factors for local tumor recurrence after segmental transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: the importance of tumor located in the segmental border zone. Korean J Radiol (2006) 7:267–74.[Web of Science][Medline]
29 Horigome H, Nomura T, Saso K, Joh T, Ohara H, Itoh M. Artificial ascites method: percutaneous treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma located just beneath the diaphragm. Am J Gastroenterol (2000) 95:2404–5.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
30 Ishikawa T, Kohno T, Shibayama T, Fukushima Y, Obi S, Teratani T, et al. Thoracoscopic thermal ablation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma located beneath the diaphragm. Endoscopy (2001) 33:697–702.[CrossRef][Medline]
31 Montorsi M, Santambrogio R, Bianchi P, Opocher E, Zuin M, Bertolini E, et al. Radiofrequency interstitial thermal ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma in liver cirrhosis. Role of the laparoscopic approach. Surg Endosc (2001) 15:141–5.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
32 Rhim H, Goldberg SN, Dod GD III, Solbiati L, Lim HK, Massimo Tonolini T, Cho OK. Essential techniques for successful radio-frequency thermal ablation of malignant hepatic tumors. Radiographics (2001) 21:S17–35.
33 Nakashima Y, Nakashima O, Tanaka M, et al. Portal vein invasion and intrahepatic micrometastasis in small hepatocellular carcinoma by gross type. Hepatol Res (2003) 26:142–7.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  Y. Park, Y.-s. Kim, H. Rhim, H. K. Lim, D. Choi, and W. J. Lee Arterial Enhancement of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Before Radiofrequency Ablation as a Predictor of Postablation Local Tumor Progression Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2009; 193(3): 757 - 763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Mori, K. Fukuda, H. Asaoka, T. Ueda, A. Kunimatsu, Y. Okamoto, K. Nasu, K. Fukunaga, Y. Morishita, and M. Minami Radiofrequency Ablation of the Liver: Determination of Ablative Margin at MR Imaging with Impaired Clearance of Ferucarbotran--Feasibility Study Radiology, May 1, 2009; 251(2): 557 - 565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||