Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Atagi, S
Right arrow Articles by Yamamoto, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Atagi, S
Right arrow Articles by Yamamoto, S
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 27, Issue 5 293-297, Copyright © 1997 by Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Utility of hyaluronic acid in pleural fluid for differential diagnosis of pleural effusions: likelihood ratios for malignant mesothelioma

S Atagi, M Ogawara, M Kawahara, M Sakatani, K Furuse, E Ueda and S Yamamoto
Department of Internal Medicine, National Kinki Central Hospital for Chest Diseases, Osaka, Japan.

The level of hyaluronic acid (HA) was determined in the pleural fluid of 99 patients, including 19 with malignant mesothelioma, 27 with lung cancer, 1 with breast cancer, 1 with mediastinal tumor and 51 with non-malignant diseases. With a cut-off level at 100 micrograms/ml, the pleural fluid concentration of HA was high in 36.8% of patients (7 of 19) with malignant mesothelioma and 1.3% of patients (1 of 80) with lung cancer and other malignant and non-malignant diseases. The mean concentration of pleural fluid HA was significantly higher in patients with mesothelioma than in those with lung cancer and other malignant and non-malignant diseases. The pre-test probability of MM was 5.9% in this series. The LRs for > or = 100, 50-99 and < or = 49 micrograms/ml are 28.3, 3.3 and 0.5, respectively; these put the post-test probabilities at 64, 17 and 3%, respectively. Indeed, in cases of uncommon disease such as MM, the post-test probability is low even if the cut-off level of HA is > or = 100 micrograms/ml. The discrimination between malignant mesothelioma and lung cancer needs special attention. In these two diseases, the LRs of MM for pleural fluid CEA > 30, 10-30 and < 10 ng/ml were 0.2, 1.9 and 2.4, respectively. The pre-test probability of MM for HA > or = or 100 micrograms/ml is 64%. Furthermore, because the LR for CEA is < 10 ng/ml, the post-test probability is 81%. When the combination of two markers is considered, the high level of HA and the low level of CEA may be useful for the differential diagnosis of MM from pleuritis carcinomatosa.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.