Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Onda, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yoshikawa, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Onda, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yoshikawa, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 34:43-45 (2004)
© 2004 Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research

Feasibility Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Interval Cytoreductive Surgery for Stage III/IV Ovarian, Tubal and Peritoneal Cancers: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0206

Takashi Onda1, Toshiharu Kamura2, Naoki Ishizuka3, Noriyuki Katsumata4, Haruhiko Fukuda3 and Hiroyuki Yoshikawa5,+

1 Division of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka, 3 Japan Clinical Oncology Group Data Center, Cancer Information and Epidemiology Division, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, 4 Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo and 5 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan

A feasibility study was started in January 2003 on neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) and postoperative chemotherapy for stage III/IV müllerian carcinomas such as ovarian, tubal and peritoneal carcinomas. The purpose is to assess the safety and efficacy of the treatment starting with NAC and also to know whether we can accurately diagnose these advanced carcinomas by imaging studies, cytologic findings and tumor markers without staging laparotomy or laparoscopy. Fifty-six patients with advanced müllerian carcinomas will be recruited to the study. After confirmation of diagnosis by laparoscopic inspection and biopsies, patients undergo four cycles of chemotherapy as NAC, followed by ICS and an additional four cycles of post-surgical chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is proportion of clinical complete remission after accomplishment of the protocol treatment, while the major secondary endpoint is positive predictive value of diagnosis before laparoscopy regarding tumor origin, histology and stage. Based on the results of this study, we will conduct a phase III study to compare the treatment starting with NAC and primary cytoreductive surgery followed by post-surgical chemotherapy.

+ For reprints and all correspondence: Takashi Onda, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan. E-mail: taonda{at}ncc.go.jp


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
T. Onda, H. Yoshikawa, T. Yasugi, K. Matsumoto, and Y. Taketani
The Optimal Debulking after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer: Proposal based on Interval Look During Upfront Surgery Setting Treatment
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., October 10, 2009; (2009) hyp127v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
T. Onda, K. Matsumoto, T. Shibata, A. Sato, H. Fukuda, I. Konishi, T. Kamura, and H. Yoshikawa
Phase III Trial of Upfront Debulking Surgery Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage III/IV Ovarian, Tubal and Peritoneal Cancers: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0602
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2008; 38(1): 74 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.