Skip Navigation

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 2004 34(10):602-607; doi:10.1093/jjco/hyh112
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matsui, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Arai, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Matsui, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Arai, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© 2004 Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research

The Use of Artificial Neural Network Analysis to Improve the Predictive Accuracy of Prostate Biopsy in the Japanese Population

Yoshiyuki Matsui1, Noriaki Utsunomiya1, Kentaro Ichioka1, Norihumi Ueda1, Koji Yoshimura1, Akito Terai1 and Yoichi Arai2

1 Department of Urology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan and 2 Department of Urology, Tohoku University, School of Medicine, Sendai

For reprints and all correspondence: Yoshiyuki Matsui, Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, Shogoin Kawahara-cho 54, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan. E-mail: ym1108{at}kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Received May 20, 2004; accepted August 9, 2004

Objective: We examined the efficacy of an artificial neural network analysis (ANNA) based on parameters available from previously existing examinations for improving the predictive accuracy of prostate cancer screening in the Japanese population.

Methods: Two hundred and twenty-eight patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of 2–10 ng/ml were enrolled in this study. Two artificial neural network analysis (ANNA) models were constructed: ANNA1 with patient age, total PSA, free to total PSA ratio, prostate volume, transition zone volume (TZ), PSA density (PSAD) and PSA-TZ density (PSATZ) as input variables, and ANNA2 with presumed circle area ratio (PCAR), digital rectal examination (DRE) findings and chief complaint added as variables. The predictive accuracies of the ANNA models were compared with conventional PSA and volume-related parameters and a logistic regression (LR) model by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results: Of 228 patients, 58 (25.5%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer. While ANNA2 had a slightly larger area under the curve (AUC) than ANNA1 (0.782 versus 0.793, P = 0.8477), the AUC of ANNA2 was significantly greater than those of ln(PSA), PSAD, PSATZ and free to total PSA ratio (P = 0.0004, 0.0230, 0.0304, and 0.0037, respectively). The accuracy of ANNA2 was significantly better than that of LR analysis at 90 and 95% sensitivity levels (P = 0.0051 and P < 0.0001, respectively). At 95% sensitivity level, ANNA2 reduced unnecessary biopsies by 40.0% with a negative predictive value of 95.7%.

Conclusions: To determine the indication of prostate biopsy for PSA value in the range of 2–10 ng/ml, the ANNA model has the possibility to reduce unnecessary biopsies without missing many cases of cancers.

Key Words: prostate cancer • artificial neural network analysis • prostate biopsy • logistic regression analysis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JPEN J Parenter Enteral NutrHome page
R. N. Dickerson, D. L. Mason, M. A. Croce, G. Minard, and R. O. Brown
Evaluation of an Artificial Neural Network to Predict Urea Nitrogen Appearance for Critically Ill Multiple-Trauma Patients
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, November 1, 2005; 29(6): 429 - 435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.