Skip Navigation


Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology Advance Access originally published online on May 22, 2008
Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 2008 38(6):419-425; doi:10.1093/jjco/hyn040
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/6/419    most recent
hyn040v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taira, N.
Right arrow Articles by Nishimura, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taira, N.
Right arrow Articles by Nishimura, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author (2008). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved

Contrast-enhanced CT Evaluation of Clinically and Mammographically Occult Multiple Breast Tumors in Women with Unilateral Early Breast Cancer

Naruto Taira1, Shozo Ohsumi2, Daisuke Takabatake2, Fumikata Hara2, Seiki Takashima2, Kenjiro Aogi2, Shigemitsu Takashima2, Takeshi Inoue3, Shigenori Sugata3 and Rieko Nishimura4

1 Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama
2 Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery
3 Department of Radiology
4 Department of Pathology, National Hospital Organization, National Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan

For reprints and all correspondence: Naruto Taira, Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Okayama 700-8558, Japan. E-mail: ntaira{at}md.okayama-u.ac.jp

Received February 26, 2008; accepted April 26, 2008

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging mammography is performed to determine the extent of lesions and to detect occult lesions, but preoperative diagnosis by breast computed tomography (CT) is less common.

Methods: We performed a retrospective study of detection of mammographically occult multiple lesions using breast CT. The subjects were 407 female patients (median age: 56 years old; median tumor size: 1.9 cm) with breast cancer who underwent preoperative, contrast-enhanced breast CT.

Results: CT detected 73 incidental-enhanced breast nodules (median size: 0.8 cm) in 73 patients that were undetectable by conventional methods. Age, size of the main lesion or laterality of lesions did not differ between patients with and without incidental nodules, but the frequency of mastectomy was significantly higher in those with incidental nodules. Of the 73 incidental nodules, 22 (30%) were in the same quadrant as the main lesion, 26 (36%) were in other quadrants and 25 (34%) were in the opposite breast. On qualitative diagnosis by CT, 48 were suspected to be malignant (66%), 17 benign (23%) and eight non-specific (11%). In histological evaluation of 44 of the 48 nodules suspected to be malignant, 24 were malignant (invasive carcinoma: 22, non-invasive carcinoma: 2); of seven of the 17 nodules suspected to be benign, all were benign; and of three of the eight non-specific nodules, one was non-invasive carcinoma. The discovery rate of clinically and mammographically occult multiple lesions by preoperative breast CT was 6%.

Conclusion: We conclude that breast CT is useful for the detection of occult lesions and choice of surgical procedure.

Key Words: breast CT • preoperative • occult lesion • IEBN • MRI • malignancy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
radtechHome page
A. REYNOLDS
The Augmented Breast
Radiol. Technol., January 1, 2009; 80(3): 241M - 259M.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.