Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology Advance Access published online on January 17, 2006
Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, doi:10.1093/jjco/hyi216
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Radiology, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa; Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Background: The Patterns of Care Study evaluated standards of practice for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy in Japan. This study examined the influence of institutional stratification on care for patients receiving radical external beam radiotherapy. Methods: A national survey of 66 institutions was conducted using two-stage cluster sampling, and detailed information was accumulated on 283 patients who received radiotherapy between 1999 and 2001. Results: In A (academic) and B (non-academic) institutions, more than 80% of patients had intermediate or unfavorable risk disease. Although there were no significant differences in disease characteristics between A and B institutions, institutional stratification significantly affected radiotherapy practice patterns, such as the use of a CT-based treatment planning (A1: 91.5%, B: 77.1%; P = 0.0007) and the use of conformal therapy (A: 56.4%, B: 24.1%; P < 0.0001). CT-based treatment planning and conformal therapy significantly influenced total radiation dose (P < 0.0001 for each). Hormonal therapy was commonly used in both A and B institutions (A: 89.0%, B: 90.7%). Many patients with a favorable prognosis (A: 62.5%, B: 91.7%) received hormonal therapy, and most patients with unfavorable risk disease (A: 93.6%, B: 91.6%) also received hormonal therapy. Conclusion: During the period 1999-2001, the majority of prostate cancer patients treated in Japan with radical external beam radiotherapy had advanced diseases. Institutional stratification significantly affected radiotherapy practice patterns, with the notable exception that radiotherapy was commonly combined with hormonal therapy regardless of the institutional stratification and individual risk.
Received September 27, 2005
Accepted November 16, 2005
Original Article
Radical External Beam Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer in Japan: Results of the 1999-2001 Patterns of Care Process Survey
Kazuhiko Ogawa 1 *,
Katsumasa Nakamura 2,
Hiroshi Onishi 3,
Tomonari Sasaki 2,
Masahiko Koizumi 4,
Yoshiyuki Shioyama 2,
Takafumi Komiyama 3,
Yuuki Miyabe 5,
Teruki Teshima 5,
and
and Japanese Patterns of Care Study Working Subgroup of Prostate Cancer
2 Department of Clinical Radiology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka
3 Department of Radiology, Yamanashi University, Nakatama-gun, Yamanashi
4 Department of Radiology, Kyoto Prefectural University, Kyoto
5 Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
Kazuhiko Ogawa, E-mail: kogawa{at}med.u-ryukyu.ac.jp
Abstract 
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. Nakamura, Y. Shioyama, S. Tokumaru, N. Hayashi, N. Oya, Y. Hiraki, K. Kusuhara, T. Toita, H. Suefuji, N. Hayabuchi, et al. Variation of Clinical Target Volume Definition among Japanese Radiation Oncologists in External Beam Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2008; 38(4): 275 - 280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Nakamura, T. Mizowaki, H. Imada, K. Karasawa, T. Uno, H. Onishi, K. Nihei, S. Sasaki, M. Ogura, and T. Akimoto External-Beam Radiotherapy for Localized or Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer in Japan: A Multi-Institutional Outcome Analysis Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2008; 38(3): 200 - 204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|