Skip Navigation



Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology Advance Access published online on March 6, 2006

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, doi:10.1093/jjco/hyi235
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/3/150    most recent
hyi235v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kurebayashi, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sonoo, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kurebayashi, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sonoo, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research
Received October 18, 2005
Accepted December 20, 2005

Original Article

Combined Measurement of Serum Sialyl Lewis X with Serum CA15-3 in Breast Cancer Patients

Junichi Kurebayashi 1 *, Tsunehisa Nomura 1, Mai Hirono 1, Sumiko Okubo 1, Kiyoshi Udagawa 1, Shigeo Shiiki 1, Masahiko Ikeda 1, Kazutaka Nakashima 1, Katsuhiro Tanaka 1, and Hiroshi Sonoo 1

1 Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Junichi Kurebayashi, E-mail: kure{at}med.kawasaki-m.ac.jp


   Abstract

Background: Serum CA15-3 has been one of the most reliable tumor markers used in monitoring breast cancer patients; however, its sensitivity in detecting metastases is limited. To increase its sensitivity, the combined measurement of other tumor markers with CA15-3 was investigated.

Methods: Serum CA15-3, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and sialyl Lewis X (CSLEX) were simultaneously measured in a prospective series of 455 postoperative breast cancer patients with or without metastasis. The diagnostic parameters sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy for detecting metastases were compared. The correlation of values between pairs of tumor markers was analyzed. The efficacy of combined measurement of two different tumor markers was also evaluated.

Results: The sensitivity for detecting metastases was 61.5, 56.9 and 52.3%; specificity was 97.2, 93.6 and 96.2%; PPV was 78.4, 59.7 and 69.4%; NPV was 93.8, 92.9 and 92.4%; and accuracy was 92.1, 88.8 and 89.9% for CA15-3, CEA and CSLEX, respectively. The values for CA15-3 were significantly correlated with those for CEA (P < 0.001) but not those for CSLEX. The combined measurement of CSLEX and CA15-3 increased the sensitivity by 17.0% but that of CEA and CA15-3 increased the sensitivity by only 10.8%. All diagnostic parameters for the combined measurement of CSLEX and CA15-3 were higher than those for the combined measurement of CEA and CA15-3.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that CSLEX may be more useful than CEA in combination with CA15-3 in monitoring breast cancer patients. The results of this study suggest that CSLEX may be more useful than CEA in combination with CA15-3 in monitoring breast cancer patients.

Keywords: CSLEX; CA15-3; CEA; breast cancer; metastasis.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GlycobiologyHome page
U. M Abd Hamid, L. Royle, R. Saldova, C. M Radcliffe, D. J Harvey, S. J Storr, M. Pardo, R. Antrobus, C. J Chapman, N. Zitzmann, et al.
A strategy to reveal potential glycan markers from serum glycoproteins associated with breast cancer progression
Glycobiology, December 1, 2008; 18(12): 1105 - 1118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.