Skip Navigation



Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology Advance Access published online on April 12, 2006

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, doi:10.1093/jjco/hyl005
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/4/231    most recent
hyl005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morita, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sakamoto, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morita, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sakamoto, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research
Received September 7, 2005
Accepted January 5, 2006

Original Article

A phase I/II Trial of a WT1 (Wilms' Tumor Gene) Peptide Vaccine in Patients with Solid Malignancy: Safety Assessment Based on the Phase I Data

Satoshi Morita 1 *, Yoshihiro Oka 2, Akihiro Tsuboi 3, Manabu Kawakami 3, Motohiko Maruno 4, Shuichi Izumoto 4, Tadashi Osaki 2, Tetsuya Taguchi 5, Takafumi Ueda 6, Akira Myoui 6, Sumiyuki Nishida 3, Toshiaki Shirakata 2, Satoshi Ohno 7, Yusuke Oji 7, Katsuyuki Aozasa 8, Jun Hatazawa 9, Keiko Udaka 10, Hideki Yoshikawa 6, Toshiki Yoshimine 4, Shinzaburo Noguchi 5, Ichiro Kawase 2, Shin-ichi Nakatsuka 11, Haruo Sugiyama 7, and Junichi Sakamoto 12

1 Department of Epidemiology and Health Care Research, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
2 Department of Molecular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
3 Department of Cancer Immunotherapy, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
4 Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
5 Department of Surgical Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
6 Department of Orthopaedics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
7 Department of Functional Diagnostic Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
8 Department of Pathology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
9 Department of Nuclear Medicine and Tracer Kinetics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
10 Department of Immunology, Kochi Medical School, Nankoku, Kochi, Japan
11 Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Hospital Organization, Osaka Minami Medical Center, Kawachinagano, Osaka, Japan
12 Department of Epidemiological & Clinical Research Information Management, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Satoshi Morita, E-mail: satoshi_morita{at}pbh.med.kyoto-u.ac.jp


   Abstract

Objective: We conducted a phase I study to investigate the safety of a weekly WT1 tumor vaccine therapy in patients with solid tumors that had been refractory to all other anti-cancer therapies.

Methods: Skin-test-negative patients were intradermally injected weekly for 12 weeks with 3.0 mg of an HLA-A*2402-restricted modified 9-mer WT1 peptide emulsified in Montanide ISA51 adjuvant. We estimated the Bayesian posterior probability of the occurrence of grade 3 or 4 toxicity when receiving the weekly WT1 vaccination. This analysis provided the basis for making a decision to terminate the phase I study and switch to phase II. Moreover, we performed an exploratory assessment of the anti-tumor effects of WT1 treatment.

Results: Ten patients received 114 vaccinations with WT1 on a weekly schedule. No grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed. Based on the Bayesian approach, it was highly likely that the probability of grade 3 or 4 toxicity was below 20% (the posterior probability = 0.914). Fifteen grade 2 and two grade 1 toxicities were observed; all of these incidents, however, were determined by the Independent Data and Safety Monitoring Committee to be unrelated to the WT1 treatment. One patient exhibited a partial response; five additional patients had stable disease while receiving weekly WT1 treatment.

Conclusion: This paper confirms that the potential toxicities of the treatment schedule of weekly WT1 vaccination are acceptable and suggested a potential anti-tumor effect. Consequently, we validated the decision to continue to the phase II trial.

Keywords: WT1 peptide vaccine; solid tumor; phase I trial; Bayesian approach; weekly schedule.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed BookHome page
A. J. Barrett
Leukemia Vaccines to Boost the Graft-versus-Leukemia Effect after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation
ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2008; 2008(1): 330 - 333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.