Skip Navigation



Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology Advance Access published online on June 27, 2006

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, doi:10.1093/jjco/hyl047
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/7/418    most recent
hyl047v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Obara, W.
Right arrow Articles by Fujioka, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Obara, W.
Right arrow Articles by Fujioka, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research
Received February 19, 2006
Accepted April 1, 2006

Original Article

Eight Year Experience with Studer Ileal Neobladder

Wataru Obara 1 *, Kazumasa Isurugi 1, Daisuke Kudo 1, Ryo Takata 1, Karen Kato 1, Mitsugu Kanehira 1, Kazuhiro Iwasaki 1, Susumu Tanji 1, Ryuichiro Konda 1, and Tomoaki Fujioka 1

1 Department of Urology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Morioka, Japan

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Wataru Obara, E-mail: watao{at}iwate-med.ac.jp


   Abstract

Background: We reviewed our experience with orthotopic continent urinary reconstruction after radical cystectomy to assess the feasibility of Studer ileal neobladder for patients who are relatively advanced in age.

Methods: Between June 1997 and January 2005, 31 consecutive male patients (mean age: 64 years) underwent lower urinary tract reconstruction after radical cystoprostatectomy. Perioperative and late complications, functional outcome of the neobladder, urinary continence, upper urinary tract status and renal function with the metabolic balance were evaluated in all patients.

Results: There was no perioperative death, and perioperative and late complication rates were 22.8% and 3.3%, respectively. All 31 patients were able to void urine. Although the mean maximal functional capacity of the neobladder was 122 ml at 1 month after surgery, the mean capacities were increased to 247 ml at 6 months and 321 ml at 1 year after the operation. Urodynamic results at 3 years showed unchanged characteristics as to micturition pattern and volume of residual urine and neobladder pressure remained low. Of 31 patients, 29 (93.5%) showed excellent or good continent status during the daytime and 9 (29%) were completely dry at night in 6 months after surgery. Even at 3 years after the operation, only 1 patient out of 21 evaluated required single pad during nighttime. In a subgroup of five patients (24%) older than 70 years, the status of continence was satisfactory at 3 years after the reconstruction, and only one patient required a pad during the night at that point. Renal function levels and metabolic status were comparable before surgery and 3 years after surgery. Moreover, pyelography revealed normal condition of the upper urinary tract 1 month postoperatively in almost all cases.

Conclusions: These data provide evidence that Studer ileal neobladder is a satisfactory surgical technique for selected patients at our institute. Even for patients older than 70 years, this urinary diversion procedure is safe in terms of morbidity and efficacious as indicated by functional outcome.

Keywords: Studer ileal neobladder; orthotopic continent urinary reconstruction; bladder cancer.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.